de Barra Mícheál, Cownden Daniel, Jansson Fredrik
Centre for Culture and Evolution, Brunel University, London.
Unaffiliated.
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 May 28;1:e4. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.2. eCollection 2019.
Ineffective, aversive and harmful medical treatments are common cross-culturally, historically and today. Using evolutionary game theory, we develop the following model to explain their persistence. Humans are often incapacitated by illness and injury, and are unusually dependent on care from others during convalescence. However, such caregiving is vulnerable to exploitation via illness deception, whereby people feign or exaggerate illness in order to gain access to care. Our model demonstrates that aversive treatments can counter-intuitively increase the range of conditions where caregiving is evolutionarily viable, because only individuals who stand to gain substantially from care will accept the treatment. Thus, contemporary and historical "ineffective" treatments may be solutions to the problem of allocating care to people whose true need is difficult to discern.
无效、厌恶且有害的医疗手段在跨文化、历史以及当今都很常见。运用进化博弈论,我们构建了以下模型来解释它们为何持续存在。人类常常因疾病和伤痛而丧失能力,在康复期间异常依赖他人的照料。然而,这种照料容易因疾病欺骗而被利用,即人们假装或夸大病情以获取照料。我们的模型表明,厌恶疗法可能会反直觉地扩大照料在进化上可行的条件范围,因为只有那些从照料中能大幅获益的个体才会接受这种治疗。因此,当代和历史上的“无效”疗法可能是解决将照料分配给真正需求难以辨别的人群这一问题的办法。