Division of Movement and Training Sciences/Biomechanics of Sport, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0290320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290320. eCollection 2023.
This systematic scoping review aims to summarize findings regarding kinetic, kinematic, and electromyographic analyses of different characteristics (i.e., type/direction and stance style) of the tennis serve and groundstroke. A systematic search of the literature was performed on the databases PubMed, Web of Science, and SportDiscus from their inception date till May 2023. A descriptive analysis of results was conducted. The literature search identified a total of N = 899 records, 23 of which met the inclusion criteria and were analysed in this review. A total of 229 participants aged 18 to 62 years participated in the studies. The studies revealed varying results, ranging from significantly lower/higher values to no significant differences between serve/groundstroke characteristics. These inconsistent results may most likely be attributed to discrepancies in the methodological approach such as players' age (18-62 years), sex (i.e., men only or both sexes), and performance level (i.e., recreational, intermediate, or advanced) as well as the applied measurement devices (i.e., force plate or pressure-detecting insoles; motion capture system, high-speed video recordings, or IMU sensors) and used outcomes (i.e., measured or estimated force etc.). Future research is needed to provide a comprehensive biomechanical analysis of different serve/groundstroke characteristics. Specifically, it is recommended to compare different tennis serve and groundstroke types/directions and stance styles in female and male age-matched players with diverging performance levels (i.e., recreational, intermediate, advanced) using combined (i.e., kinetic, kinematic, and electromyographic) biomechanical analysis.
本系统范围综述旨在总结不同网球发球和击球特征(即发球类型/方向和站位方式)的动力学、运动学和肌电图分析的研究结果。从数据库 PubMed、Web of Science 和 SportDiscus 中对文献进行了系统检索,检索时间从创建日期到 2023 年 5 月。对结果进行了描述性分析。文献检索共确定了 N = 899 条记录,其中 23 条符合纳入标准并在本综述中进行了分析。共有 229 名年龄在 18 至 62 岁的参与者参加了这些研究。研究结果显示,发球和击球特征之间存在差异,从显著较低/较高值到无显著差异不等。这些不一致的结果可能主要归因于方法学方法的差异,例如球员年龄(18-62 岁)、性别(即仅男性或男女混合)和表现水平(即娱乐、中级或高级)以及应用的测量设备(即力板或压力探测鞋垫;运动捕捉系统、高速视频记录或 IMU 传感器)和使用的结果(即测量或估计力等)。需要进一步的研究来提供不同发球和击球特征的全面生物力学分析。具体而言,建议使用联合(即动力学、运动学和肌电图)生物力学分析,在具有不同表现水平(即娱乐、中级、高级)的年龄匹配男女球员中比较不同的网球发球和击球类型/方向和站位方式。