School of Health Sciences, College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; Food and Nutrition Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia; Food and Nutrition Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Adv Nutr. 2023 Nov;14(6):1453-1465. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
Dietary metabolomics is a relatively objective approach to identifying new biomarkers of dietary intake and for use alongside traditional methods. However, methods used across dietary feeding studies vary, thus making it challenging to compare results. The objective of this study was to synthesize methodological components of controlled human feeding studies designed to quantify the diet-related metabolome in biospecimens, including plasma, serum, and urine after dietary interventions. Six electronic databases were searched. Included studies were as follows: 1) conducted in healthy adults; 2) intervention studies; 3) feeding studies focusing on dietary patterns; and 4) measured the dietary metabolome. From 12,425 texts, 50 met all inclusion criteria. Interventions were primarily crossover (n = 25) and parallel randomized controlled trials (n = 22), with between 8 and 395 participants. Seventeen different dietary patterns were tested, with the most common being the "High versus Low-Glycemic Index/Load" pattern (n = 11) and "Typical Country Intake" (n = 11); with 32 providing all or the majority (90%) of food, 16 providing some food, and 2 providing no food. Metabolites were identified in urine (n = 31) and plasma/serum (n = 30). Metabolites were quantified using liquid chromatography, mass spectroscopy (n = 31) and used untargeted metabolomics (n = 37). There was extensive variability in the methods used in controlled human feeding studies examining the metabolome, including dietary patterns tested, biospecimen sample collection, and metabolomic analysis techniques. To improve the comparability and reproducibility of controlled human feeding studies examining the metabolome, it is important to provide detailed information about the dietary interventions being tested, including information about included or restricted foods, food groups, and meal plans provided. Strategies to control for individual variability, such as a crossover study design, statistical adjustment methods, dietary-controlled run-in periods, or providing standardized meals or test foods throughout the study should also be considered. The protocol for this review has been registered at Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DAHGS).
饮食代谢组学是一种相对客观的方法,可用于识别饮食摄入的新生物标志物,并与传统方法一起使用。然而,饮食喂养研究中使用的方法各不相同,因此难以比较结果。本研究的目的是综合设计用于量化饮食干预后生物样本中与饮食相关的代谢组的受控人体喂养研究的方法学成分,包括血浆、血清和尿液。六个电子数据库被搜索。包括的研究如下:1)在健康成年人中进行;2)干预研究;3)专注于饮食模式的喂养研究;4)测量饮食代谢组。从 12425 篇文章中,有 50 篇符合所有纳入标准。干预措施主要是交叉(n=25)和平行随机对照试验(n=22),参与者人数为 8 至 395 人。测试了 17 种不同的饮食模式,最常见的是“高与低血糖指数/负荷”模式(n=11)和“典型国家摄入量”(n=11);32 种提供了全部或大部分(90%)食物,16 种提供了一些食物,2 种提供了没有食物。在尿液(n=31)和血浆/血清(n=30)中鉴定了代谢物。使用液相色谱法、质谱法(n=31)和非靶向代谢组学(n=37)定量代谢物。在检查代谢组的受控人体喂养研究中,使用的方法存在广泛的变异性,包括测试的饮食模式、生物样本采集和代谢组分析技术。为了提高检查代谢组的受控人体喂养研究的可比性和可重复性,重要的是要提供有关正在测试的饮食干预的详细信息,包括有关包含或限制食物、食物组和提供的膳食计划的信息。还应考虑控制个体变异性的策略,例如交叉研究设计、统计调整方法、饮食控制的运行期或在整个研究过程中提供标准化膳食或测试食品。本综述的方案已在开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DAHGS)上注册。