• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量急性医院护理质量的患者体验:现有量表的回顾和新量表的开发及心理测量学验证。

Measuring patients' experience of nursing quality in acute hospitals: review of existing scales and development and psychometric validation of a new scale.

机构信息

Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.

Institute for Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e072838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072838.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072838
PMID:38309765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10840043/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of existing instruments measuring patient-perceived quality of nursing care and to develop and psychometrically evaluate a new multidimensional scale applicable to the German acute care sector.

DESIGN

We conducted a scale development and validation study involving the following phases: (1) performing a structured literature search to identify existing scales, (2) generating an initial pool of items using the results of the literature search and expert interviews, (3) coding/categorising the item pool, (4) organising a peer researcher workshop to select relevant items, (5) drafting the survey questionnaire and conducting cognitive pretesting, (6) pilot testing the survey questionnaire, (7) administering the survey to a large sample of hospital patients and (8) conducting a psychometric evaluation comprising exploratory factor analysis using the survey results, followed by confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity assessment of the resulting draft scale.

SURVEY PARTICIPANTS

17 859 recently hospitalised patients discharged from non-intensive care in non-paediatric and non-psychiatric hospital units in Germany between May and October 2019.

RESULTS

We identified 32 instruments comprising 635 items on nursing care quality. Alongside 135 indicators derived from expert interviews, these formed our initial item pool, which we coded into 15 categories. From this pool, 36 items were selected in the peer researcher workshop for pretesting and psychometric evaluation. Based on the results of our exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, we propose a second-order scale to measure Patients' Experience of Nursing Quality in Acute Hospitals (PENQuAH), including the two higher-order dimensions 'patients' perception of direct nursing care activities' and 'patients' perception of guidance provided by nurses'. The results of various tests suggest the scale has sufficient goodness of fit, reliability and validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The PENQuAH scale is promising in terms of its psychometric properties, the plausibility and meaningfulness of its dimensions, and its ease of use.

摘要

目的

综述现有的测量患者感知护理质量的工具,并开发和心理计量学评估适用于德国急性护理领域的新多维量表。

设计

我们进行了一项量表开发和验证研究,包括以下阶段:(1)进行系统文献检索以确定现有量表,(2)使用文献检索和专家访谈的结果生成初始项目池,(3)对项目池进行编码/分类,(4)组织同行研究人员研讨会以选择相关项目,(5)起草调查问卷并进行认知预测试,(6)进行试点测试,(7)对大量医院患者进行调查,以及(8)使用调查结果进行探索性因素分析,然后进行验证性因素分析和对生成的草案量表进行可靠性和有效性评估。

调查对象

2019 年 5 月至 10 月期间,德国非儿科和非精神科医院普通病房出院的最近住院的 17859 名非重症患者。

结果

我们确定了 32 种工具,包括 635 项关于护理质量的项目。除了来自专家访谈的 135 个指标外,这些工具和指标构成了我们的初始项目池,我们将其编码为 15 个类别。从这个池中,36 个项目在同行研究人员的预测试和心理计量学评估中被选中。根据我们的探索性和验证性因素分析的结果,我们提出了一个用于测量急性医院患者护理质量体验的二阶量表(PENQuAH),包括两个更高阶的维度:“患者对直接护理活动的感知”和“患者对护士提供的指导的感知”。各种测试的结果表明该量表具有足够的拟合优度、可靠性和有效性。

结论

PENQuAH 量表在心理计量学特性、维度的合理性和有意义性以及易用性方面都很有前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc92/10840043/855ada95c630/bmjopen-2023-072838f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc92/10840043/fedac4f660ed/bmjopen-2023-072838f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc92/10840043/db1c3a6daab7/bmjopen-2023-072838f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc92/10840043/855ada95c630/bmjopen-2023-072838f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc92/10840043/fedac4f660ed/bmjopen-2023-072838f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc92/10840043/db1c3a6daab7/bmjopen-2023-072838f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc92/10840043/855ada95c630/bmjopen-2023-072838f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring patients' experience of nursing quality in acute hospitals: review of existing scales and development and psychometric validation of a new scale.测量急性医院护理质量的患者体验:现有量表的回顾和新量表的开发及心理测量学验证。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 2;14(2):e072838. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072838.
2
Developing and psychometric testing of the anaesthesia nursing competence scale.麻醉护理能力量表的编制与心理测量学测试
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;26(3):866-878. doi: 10.1111/jep.13215. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
3
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
4
Psychometric properties of the Nursing Intensive Care Satisfaction Scale: A multicentre cross-sectional study.《护理重症监护满意度量表的心理测量学特性:一项多中心横断面研究》
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Jul;36(4):550-557. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.03.012. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
Development of the Pediatric Hospitalization Admission Survey of Experience (PHASE) Measure.发展儿科住院体验评估量表(PHASE)。
Pediatrics. 2023 Sep 1;152(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2023-061522.
6
Development and initial validation of a Theory of Planned Behaviour questionnaire to assess critical care nurses' intention to use physical restraints.制定并初步验证理论行为计划问卷评估重症监护护士使用身体约束的意图。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Sep;75(9):2036-2049. doi: 10.1111/jan.14046. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
Development and psychometric testing of burn inpatient nursing dependency assessment scale.烧伤患者护理依赖评估量表的编制及心理测量学特性检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3483-3494. doi: 10.1111/jan.15418. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
8
Development and Pretesting of a Questionnaire to Assess Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM Questionnaire).评估患者用药体验和满意度问卷(PESaM 问卷)的编制和预测试。
Patient. 2017 Oct;10(5):629-642. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0234-z.
9
The development and psychometric validation of a Chinese empathy motivation scale.中文同理心动机量表的编制与心理测量学验证。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Jul;28(13-14):2599-2612. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14846. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
Development and psychometric testing of a Chinese version of the postnatal care experience scale for postpartum women.发展和心理测量学检验中文版产后妇女产后护理体验量表。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 16;23(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06187-z.

本文引用的文献

1
[What patients judge as important regarding nursing quality: Content analysis of patients' responses to an open-ended question within an online survey].[患者对护理质量重要性的判断:对在线调查中一个开放式问题患者回答的内容分析]
Pflege. 2022 Aug;35(4):207-214. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000875. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
2
Nurse staffing and patient-perceived quality of nursing care: a cross-sectional analysis of survey and administrative data in German hospitals.护士人力配置与患者感知的护理质量:德国医院调查和行政数据的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e051133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051133.
3
The impact of nurse staffing levels on nursing-sensitive patient outcomes: a multilevel regression approach.
护士人力配置水平对护理敏感患者结局的影响:多水平回归分析方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jul;22(5):833-846. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01292-2. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
5
Staffing levels and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes: Umbrella review and qualitative study.人员配备水平与护理敏感型患者结局:伞式综述和定性研究。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):885-907. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13647. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
6
Fitting Ordinal Factor Analysis Models With Missing Data: A Comparison Between Pairwise Deletion and Multiple Imputation.拟合存在缺失数据的有序因子分析模型:成对删除法与多重填补法的比较
Educ Psychol Meas. 2020 Feb;80(1):41-66. doi: 10.1177/0013164419845039. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
7
How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions.如何在现实条件下确定探索性因素分析中保留的因素数量:提取方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Aug;24(4):468-491. doi: 10.1037/met0000200. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
8
Patient satisfaction with hospital care and nurses in England: an observational study.英国患者对医院护理及护士的满意度:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 11;8(1):e019189. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019189.
9
Brazilian version of the Care Transitions Measure: translation and validation.《护理转接测量巴西版》:翻译与验证。
Int Nurs Rev. 2017 Sep;64(3):379-387. doi: 10.1111/inr.12326. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements.现实条件下克朗巴哈α信度的最佳替代方法:同属与不对称测量
Front Psychol. 2016 May 26;7:769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769. eCollection 2016.