• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习算法预测充血性心力衰竭合并慢性肾脏病危重症患者的住院死亡率。

Machine learning algorithm for predict the in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with congestive heart failure combined with chronic kidney disease.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Institute of Kidney Disease, Inflammation and Immunity Mediated Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2315298. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2315298. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1080/0886022X.2024.2315298
PMID:38357763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10877653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model for predict in-hospital mortality among critically ill patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) combined with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

After employing least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression for feature selection, six distinct methodologies were employed in the construction of the model. The selection of the optimal model was based on the area under the curve (AUC). Furthermore, the interpretation of the chosen model was facilitated through the utilization of SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values and the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) algorithm.

RESULTS

This study collected data and enrolled 5041 patients on CHF combined with CKD from 2008 to 2019, utilizing the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Unit. After selection, 22 of the 47 variables collected post-intensive care unit admission were identified as mortality-associated and subsequently utilized in the development of ML models. Among the six models generated, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated the highest AUC at 0.837. Notably, the SHAP values highlighted the sequential organ failure assessment score, age, simplified acute physiology score II, and urine output as the four most influential variables in the XGBoost model. In addition, the LIME algorithm explains the individualized predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study accomplished the successful development and validation of ML models for predicting in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with CHF combined with CKD. Notably, the XGBoost model emerged as the most efficacious among all the ML models employed.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发和验证一种机器学习(ML)模型,用于预测充血性心力衰竭(CHF)合并慢性肾脏病(CKD)的危重症患者的住院死亡率。

方法

在使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归进行特征选择后,使用了六种不同的方法来构建模型。通过曲线下面积(AUC)选择最优模型。此外,通过使用 Shapley 加法解释(SHAP)值和局部可解释模型不可知解释(LIME)算法来解释所选模型。

结果

本研究利用医疗信息监护病房采集了 2008 年至 2019 年 5041 例 CHF 合并 CKD 患者的数据,在选择后,从入院后 47 个变量中确定了 22 个与死亡率相关的变量,并将其用于 ML 模型的开发。在生成的六个模型中,极端梯度提升(XGBoost)模型的 AUC 最高,为 0.837。值得注意的是,SHAP 值突出了序贯器官衰竭评估评分、年龄、简化急性生理学评分 II 和尿量作为 XGBoost 模型中四个最具影响力的变量。此外,LIME 算法解释了个体预测。

结论

总之,我们的研究成功地开发和验证了用于预测 CHF 合并 CKD 的危重症患者住院死亡率的 ML 模型。值得注意的是,XGBoost 模型是所有使用的 ML 模型中最有效的模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/63623514c049/IRNF_A_2315298_F0006_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/4ca2d2ffa65b/IRNF_A_2315298_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/9ece6d52512b/IRNF_A_2315298_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/c63c19592204/IRNF_A_2315298_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/de67a48311b1/IRNF_A_2315298_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/1185aae2da5b/IRNF_A_2315298_F0005_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/63623514c049/IRNF_A_2315298_F0006_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/4ca2d2ffa65b/IRNF_A_2315298_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/9ece6d52512b/IRNF_A_2315298_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/c63c19592204/IRNF_A_2315298_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/de67a48311b1/IRNF_A_2315298_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/1185aae2da5b/IRNF_A_2315298_F0005_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ae5/10877653/63623514c049/IRNF_A_2315298_F0006_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning algorithm for predict the in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with congestive heart failure combined with chronic kidney disease.机器学习算法预测充血性心力衰竭合并慢性肾脏病危重症患者的住院死亡率。
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2315298. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2315298. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Machine learning algorithm to predict the in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with chronic kidney disease.机器学习算法预测慢性肾脏病危重症患者住院死亡率。
Ren Fail. 2023 Dec;45(1):2212790. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2212790.
3
Machine learning algorithm to predict mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.机器学习算法预测脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤危重症患者的死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 30;13(1):5223. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32160-z.
4
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
5
Investigation on explainable machine learning models to predict chronic kidney diseases.探究可解释机器学习模型在预测慢性肾脏病中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 14;14(1):3687. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54375-4.
6
The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.应用机器学习模型预测伴有冠状动脉疾病的慢性肾脏病患者的院内死亡率。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jan 18;28(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-00995-x.
7
Predicting sepsis in-hospital mortality with machine learning: a multi-center study using clinical and inflammatory biomarkers.基于临床和炎症生物标志物的机器学习预测院内脓毒症死亡率:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Mar 6;29(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01756-0.
8
Machine learning for prediction of in-hospital mortality in lung cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit.机器学习在预测 ICU 收治的肺癌患者院内死亡率中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280606. eCollection 2023.
9
A nomogram to predict the in-hospital mortality of patients with congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease.充血性心力衰竭合并慢性肾脏病患者住院病死率预测列线图
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;9(5):3167-3176. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14042. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
10
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Prognosis Prediction in ICU Patients with Malignant Tumors and Hyperkalemia.开发和验证一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测 ICU 恶性肿瘤合并高钾血症患者的早期预后。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 26;103(30):e38747. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038747.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and in-hospital mortality in patients with congestive heart failure combined with chronic kidney disease.充血性心力衰竭合并慢性肾脏病患者红细胞分布宽度与白蛋白比值与住院死亡率的关系
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 4;12:1563512. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1563512. eCollection 2025.
2
Interpretable machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with chronic critical illness and heart failure: A multicenter study.用于预测慢性危重病和心力衰竭患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型:一项多中心研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 6;11:20552076251347785. doi: 10.1177/20552076251347785. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with ICU-acquired infections in sepsis: A retrospective cohort study.脓毒症 ICU 获得性感染的临床特征及相关危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jul 28;12:962470. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.962470. eCollection 2022.
2
Predicting Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Heart Failure Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: Retrospective Cohort Study.利用可解释机器学习模型预测重症监护病房心力衰竭患者的死亡率:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 9;24(8):e38082. doi: 10.2196/38082.
3
Effectiveness of automated alerting system compared to usual care for the management of sepsis.
Improved CKD classification based on explainable artificial intelligence with extra trees and BBFS.
基于具有极端随机树和BBFS的可解释人工智能改进慢性肾脏病分类。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02355-7.
4
Personalized prediction for recurrence of cystitis glandularis: insights from SHAP and machine learning models.腺性膀胱炎复发的个性化预测:来自SHAP和机器学习模型的见解
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Mar 30;14(3):808-819. doi: 10.21037/tau-2024-665. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
5
An interpreting machine learning models to predict amputation risk in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a multi-center study.一种用于预测糖尿病足溃疡患者截肢风险的解释性机器学习模型:一项多中心研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 25;16:1526098. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1526098. eCollection 2025.
6
Dynamic, Interpretable, Machine Learning-Based Outcome Prediction as a New Emerging Opportunity in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient Care: A Proof-of-Concept Study.基于动态、可解释性机器学习的急性缺血性中风患者护理结局预测:一项概念验证研究。
Stroke Res Treat. 2025 Mar 25;2025:3561616. doi: 10.1155/srat/3561616. eCollection 2025.
7
Can some algorithms of machine learning identify osteoporosis patients after training and testing some clinical information about patients?一些机器学习算法能否在对患者的一些临床信息进行训练和测试后识别出骨质疏松症患者?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02943-7.
8
Monitoring of the trough concentration of valproic acid in pediatric epilepsy patients: a machine learning-based ensemble model.小儿癫痫患者丙戊酸谷浓度监测:一种基于机器学习的集成模型
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1521932. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1521932. eCollection 2024.
与脓毒症常规治疗相比,自动警报系统的有效性。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jul 19;5(1):101. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00650-5.
4
Application of interpretable machine learning for early prediction of prognosis in acute kidney injury.可解释机器学习在急性肾损伤预后早期预测中的应用
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022 Jun 3;20:2861-2870. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.003. eCollection 2022.
5
Which model is superior in predicting ICU survival: artificial intelligence versus conventional approaches.哪种模型在预测 ICU 生存率方面更具优势:人工智能与传统方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 26;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01903-9.
6
Interpretable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Sepsis: A Discovery and Validation Study.用于脓毒症预后早期预测的可解释机器学习:一项发现与验证研究。
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1117-1132. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00628-6. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
7
Red Cell Distribution Width to Platelet Ratio Is Associated with Increasing In-Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury.红细胞分布宽度与血小板比值与急性肾损伤危重症患者住院死亡率的增加相关。
Dis Markers. 2022 Jan 17;2022:4802702. doi: 10.1155/2022/4802702. eCollection 2022.
8
Direct antimicrobial resistance prediction from clinical MALDI-TOF mass spectra using machine learning.使用机器学习从临床基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱直接预测抗菌药物耐药性
Nat Med. 2022 Jan;28(1):164-174. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01619-9. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
9
SAPS III is superior to SOFA for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients based on Sepsis 3.0 criteria.基于 Sepsis 3.0 标准,SAPS III 比 SOFA 更能预测脓毒症患者 28 天死亡率。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
10
Comparison of machine learning and logistic regression models in predicting acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习和逻辑回归模型在预测急性肾损伤中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jul;151:104484. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104484. Epub 2021 May 8.