Takahashi A, Honda Y, Tanaka N, Miyake J, Maeda S, Kataoka H, Sakamoto J, Okita M
Institute of Biomedical Sciences (Health Sciences), Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Physiol Res. 2024 Mar 11;73(1):105-115. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.935157.
Although electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) of skeletal muscle effectively prevents muscle atrophy, its effect on the breakdown of muscle component proteins is unknown. In this study, we investigated the biological mechanisms by which EMS-induced muscle contraction inhibits disuse muscle atrophy progression. Experimental animals were divided into a control group and three experimental groups: immobilized (Im; immobilization treatment), low-frequency (LF; immobilization treatment and low-frequency muscle contraction exercise), and high-frequency (HF; immobilization treatment and high-frequency muscle contraction exercise). Following the experimental period, bilateral soleus muscles were collected and analyzed. Atrogin-1 and Muscle RING finger 1 (MuRF-1) mRNA expression levels were significantly higher for the experimental groups than for the control group but were significantly lower for the HF group than for the Im group. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) mRNA and protein expression levels in the HF group were significantly higher than those in the Im group, with no significant differences compared to the Con group. Both the Forkhead box O (FoxO)/phosphorylated FoxO and protein kinase B (AKT)/phosphorylated AKT ratios were significantly lower for the Im group than for the control group and significantly higher for the HF group than for the Im group. These results, the suppression of atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 expression for the HF group may be due to decreased nuclear expression of FoxO by AKT phosphorylation and suppression of FoxO transcriptional activity by PGC-1alpha. Furthermore, the number of muscle contractions might be important for effective EMS.
尽管骨骼肌的电肌肉刺激(EMS)能有效预防肌肉萎缩,但其对肌肉组成蛋白分解的影响尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们调查了EMS诱导的肌肉收缩抑制废用性肌肉萎缩进展的生物学机制。实验动物分为对照组和三个实验组:固定组(Im;固定处理)、低频组(LF;固定处理和低频肌肉收缩运动)和高频组(HF;固定处理和高频肌肉收缩运动)。实验期结束后,收集并分析双侧比目鱼肌。实验组的Atrogin-1和肌肉环状指蛋白1(MuRF-1)mRNA表达水平显著高于对照组,但HF组显著低于Im组。HF组中过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ共激活因子-1α(PGC-1α)mRNA和蛋白表达水平显著高于Im组,与Con组相比无显著差异。Im组中叉头框O(FoxO)/磷酸化FoxO和蛋白激酶B(AKT)/磷酸化AKT的比率均显著低于对照组,而HF组显著高于Im组。这些结果表明,HF组中Atrogin-1和MuRF-1表达的抑制可能是由于AKT磷酸化导致FoxO核表达减少以及PGC-1α抑制FoxO转录活性所致。此外,肌肉收缩的次数对于有效的EMS可能很重要。