• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于肝纤维化分期的集成神经网络和进化算法方法:人工智能能否降低患者成本?

Integrated neural network and evolutionary algorithm approach for liver fibrosis staging: Can artificial intelligence reduce patient costs?

作者信息

Nazarizadeh Ali, Banirostam Touraj, Biglari Taraneh, Kalantarhormozi Mohammadreza, Chichagi Fatemeh, Behnoush Amir H, Habibi Mohammad A, Shahidi Ramin

机构信息

Department of Computer Engineering Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran.

The Persian Gulf Tropical Medicine Research Center The Persian Gulf Biomedical Sciences Research Institute, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr Iran.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2024 May 9;8(5):e13075. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13075. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.1002/jgh3.13075
PMID:38725944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11079785/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Staging liver fibrosis is important, and liver biopsy is the gold standard diagnostic tool. We aim to design and evaluate an artificial neural network (ANN) method by taking advantage of the Teaching Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) algorithm for the prediction of liver fibrosis stage in blood donors and hepatitis C patients.

METHODS

We propose a method based on a selection of machine learning classification methods including multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network, Naive Bayesian (NB), decision tree, and deep learning. Initially, the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) is performed to address the imbalance in the dataset. Afterward, the integration of MLP and TLBO is implemented.

RESULTS

We propose a novel algorithm that reduces the number of required patient features to seven inputs. The accuracy of MLP using 12 features is 0.903, while that of the proposed MLP with TLBO is 0.891. Besides, the diagnostic accuracy of all methods, except the model designed with the Bayesian network, increases when the SMOTE balancer is applied.

CONCLUSION

The decision tree-based deep learning methods show the highest levels of accuracy with 12 features. Interestingly, with the use of TLBO and seven features, MLP reached an accuracy rate of 0.891, which is quite satisfactory when compared with those of similar studies. The proposed model provides high diagnostic accuracy, while reducing the required number of properties from the samples. The results of our study show that the recruited algorithm of our study is more straightforward, with a smaller number of required properties and similar accuracy.

摘要

背景与目的

肝纤维化分期很重要,肝活检是金标准诊断工具。我们旨在利用基于教学学习的优化(TLBO)算法设计并评估一种人工神经网络(ANN)方法,用于预测献血者和丙型肝炎患者的肝纤维化分期。

方法

我们提出一种基于多种机器学习分类方法的方法,包括多层感知器(MLP)神经网络、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、决策树和深度学习。最初,执行合成少数过采样技术(SMOTE)以解决数据集中的不平衡问题。之后,实现MLP与TLBO的整合。

结果

我们提出一种新颖的算法,将所需患者特征数量减少到七个输入。使用12个特征的MLP的准确率为0.903,而所提出的带有TLBO的MLP的准确率为0.891。此外,当应用SMOTE平衡器时,除了基于贝叶斯网络设计的模型外,所有方法的诊断准确率均有所提高。

结论

基于决策树的深度学习方法在使用12个特征时显示出最高的准确率。有趣的是,通过使用TLBO和七个特征,MLP达到了0.891的准确率,与类似研究相比相当令人满意。所提出的模型提供了高诊断准确率,同时减少了样本所需的属性数量。我们的研究结果表明,我们研究中所采用的算法更直接,所需属性数量更少且准确率相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5027/11079785/f574510cd800/JGH3-8-e13075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5027/11079785/f574510cd800/JGH3-8-e13075-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5027/11079785/f574510cd800/JGH3-8-e13075-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Integrated neural network and evolutionary algorithm approach for liver fibrosis staging: Can artificial intelligence reduce patient costs?用于肝纤维化分期的集成神经网络和进化算法方法:人工智能能否降低患者成本?
JGH Open. 2024 May 9;8(5):e13075. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13075. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Artificial intelligence in clinical care amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.COVID-19大流行期间临床护理中的人工智能:一项系统综述。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021;19:2833-2850. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 7.
3
Combining handcrafted features with latent variables in machine learning for prediction of radiation-induced lung damage.将机器学习中的手工特征与潜在变量相结合,以预测放射性肺损伤。
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):2497-2511. doi: 10.1002/mp.13497. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
4
Diagnosis of diabetes in pregnant woman using a Chaotic-Jaya hybridized extreme learning machine model.使用混沌-Jaya 混合极限学习机模型诊断孕妇糖尿病。
J Integr Bioinform. 2020 Aug 13;18(1):81-99. doi: 10.1515/jib-2019-0097.
5
Seminal quality prediction using data mining methods.使用数据挖掘方法进行精液质量预测。
Technol Health Care. 2014;22(4):531-45. doi: 10.3233/THC-140816.
6
Prediction of compressive strength of concrete based on improved artificial bee colony-multilayer perceptron algorithm.基于改进人工蜂群-多层感知器算法的混凝土抗压强度预测
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 17;14(1):6414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57131-w.
7
Performance evaluation of nanotubular halloysites from weathered pegmatites in removing heavy metals from water through novel artificial intelligence-based models and human-based optimization algorithm.基于新型人工智能模型和人类优化算法的风化伟晶岩纳米管状埃洛石去除水中重金属的性能评价。
Chemosphere. 2021 Nov;282:131012. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131012. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Artificial intelligence model with deep learning in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease diagnosis: genetic based artificial neural networks.基于遗传学的人工智能神经网络:用于非酒精性脂肪性肝病诊断的深度学习人工智能模型。
Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2023;42(5):398-406. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2022.2152046. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
Artificial Intelligence-Based Ensemble Learning Model for Prediction of Hepatitis C Disease.基于人工智能的集成学习模型预测丙型肝炎疾病。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 27;10:892371. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892371. eCollection 2022.
10
Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.优化神经网络在医学数据集上的应用:以新生儿呼吸暂停预测为例的研究
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:59-76. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning Framework for Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics Using Plasma Lipidomics and Metabolomics.基于血浆脂质组学和代谢组学的卵巢癌诊断机器学习框架
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 10;26(14):6630. doi: 10.3390/ijms26146630.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosing the Stage of Hepatitis C Using Machine Learning.利用机器学习诊断丙型肝炎的阶段。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 10;2021:8062410. doi: 10.1155/2021/8062410. eCollection 2021.
2
The phases of hepatitis C elimination: achieving WHO elimination targets.丙型肝炎消除的阶段:实现世界卫生组织的消除目标
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;6(1):6-8. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30366-6.
3
The impact of artificial intelligence in medicine on the future role of the physician.人工智能在医学领域的应用对医生未来角色的影响。
PeerJ. 2019 Oct 4;7:e7702. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7702. eCollection 2019.
4
Burden of liver diseases in the world.世界范围内的肝脏疾病负担。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):151-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
5
Diagnostic value of combined serum biomarkers for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection: A multicenter, noninterventional, observational study.联合血清生物标志物对慢性丙型肝炎感染患者肝纤维化评估的诊断价值:一项多中心、非干预性、观察性研究。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jul;29(4):464-472. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.16597.
6
Diagnosis and staging of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: comparison and critical overview of current strategies.慢性丙型肝炎患者纤维化的诊断与分期:当前策略的比较与批判性综述
Hepat Med. 2018 Apr 3;10:13-22. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S125234. eCollection 2018.
7
Prediction of Fibrosis Progression Rate in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 4: Role of Cirrhosis Risk Score and Host Factors.慢性丙型肝炎基因4型患者纤维化进展率的预测:肝硬化风险评分和宿主因素的作用
J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2017 Mar;37(3):97-102. doi: 10.1089/jir.2016.0111. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
8
Artificial neural networks: theoretical background and pharmaceutical applications: a review.人工神经网络:理论背景与药物应用:综述
J AOAC Int. 2012 May-Jun;95(3):652-68. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.sge_wesolowski_ann.
9
Serum biochemical markers accurately predict liver fibrosis in HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infected patients.血清生化标志物能准确预测HIV与丙型肝炎病毒合并感染患者的肝纤维化情况。
AIDS. 2003 Mar 28;17(5):721-5. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200303280-00010.
10
Hepatitis C virus infection.丙型肝炎病毒感染
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jul 5;345(1):41-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200107053450107.