Institute of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 6;19(6):e0302399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302399. eCollection 2024.
This cross-sectional study aimed to determine 1) whether German citizens' adherence to health professionals' recommendations and mandates regarding protective masks during the COVID-19 pandemic varied according to their political party affiliations, and 2) how behavioral cues provided by members of shared social groups, such as family and friends, influenced individual mask-wearing behavior. A quota-based sample of German voters (n = 330) consisting of 55 citizens whose voting intentions aligned with each of the country's six main political parties responded to an online questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Univariate descriptive statistical analyses of quantitative data were conducted, and multiple regressions were performed to determine log odds and significant variations among group-based responses. A pragmatic inductive coding process was used to conduct a thematic analysis of qualitative data. Results indicated that those participants who expressed an intention to vote for the populist radical right party were the least likely to follow health experts' recommendations and the most likely to express anger and dissatisfaction over mask mandates. Prospective Left Party voters were the most likely to adhere to the advice of their doctors, while those associated with the Green Party were the most likely to adhere to the advice of public health experts. Most survey participants reported aligning their mask-wearing behavior with that of family and friends, with prospective CDU/CSU voters particularly likely to consider the mask-wearing behavior of family members. The results indicate that public health officials should consider how group-related factors influence public health compliance in order to encourage protective mask-wearing in the future.
1)德国公民在 COVID-19 大流行期间对健康专业人员关于防护口罩的建议和规定的遵守情况是否因他们的政党倾向而异,以及 2)共同的社会群体成员(如家人和朋友)提供的行为线索如何影响个人戴口罩的行为。由德国选民(n = 330)组成的配额样本,其中包括与该国六个主要政党中的每一个投票意向一致的 55 名公民,对由多项选择题和开放式问题组成的在线问卷做出了回应。对定量数据进行了单变量描述性统计分析,并进行了多元回归分析,以确定基于群组的反应中的对数几率和显著差异。采用实用归纳编码过程对定性数据进行主题分析。结果表明,那些表示有意投票给民粹主义激进右翼党派的参与者最不可能遵循健康专家的建议,并且最有可能对口罩规定表示愤怒和不满。潜在的左翼党选民最有可能遵守医生的建议,而与绿党有关的选民最有可能遵守公共卫生专家的建议。大多数调查参与者报告称他们的口罩佩戴行为与家人和朋友的行为一致,而潜在的基民盟/基社盟选民特别有可能考虑家庭成员的口罩佩戴行为。结果表明,公共卫生官员应考虑群体相关因素如何影响公众对健康的遵守情况,以便在未来鼓励佩戴防护口罩。