Suppr超能文献

健康志愿者和心肌梗死后患者血浆细胞外囊泡分离方法的比较与综合分析

Comparative and integrated analysis of plasma extracellular vesicle isolation methods in healthy volunteers and patients following myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Paget Daan, Checa Antonio, Zöhrer Benedikt, Heilig Raphael, Shanmuganathan Mayooran, Dhaliwal Raman, Johnson Errin, Jørgensen Maléne Møller, Bæk Rikke, Wheelock Craig E, Channon Keith M, Fischer Roman, Anthony Daniel C, Choudhury Robin P, Akbar Naveed

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.

Department of Pharmacology University of Oxford Oxford UK.

出版信息

J Extracell Biol. 2022 Nov 23;1(11):e66. doi: 10.1002/jex2.66. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Plasma extracellular vesicle (EV) number and composition are altered following myocardial infarction (MI), but to properly understand the significance of these changes it is essential to appreciate how the different isolation methods affect EV characteristics, proteome and sphingolipidome. Here, we compared plasma EV isolated from platelet-poor plasma from four healthy donors and six MI patients at presentation and 1-month post-MI using ultracentrifugation (UC), polyethylene glycol precipitation, acoustic trapping, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) and immunoaffinity capture. The isolated EV were evaluated by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA), Western blot, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), an EV-protein array, untargeted proteomics (LC-MS/MS) and targeted sphingolipidomics (LC-MS/MS). The application of the five different plasma EV isolation methods in patients presenting with MI showed that the choice of plasma EV isolation method influenced the ability to distinguish elevations in plasma EV concentration following MI, enrichment of EV-cargo (EV-proteins and sphingolipidomics) and associations with the size of the infarct determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 6 months post-MI. Despite the selection bias imposed by each method, a core of EV-associated proteins and lipids was detectable using all approaches. However, this study highlights how each isolation method comes with its own idiosyncrasies and makes the comparison of data acquired by different techniques in clinical studies problematic.

摘要

心肌梗死后,血浆细胞外囊泡(EV)的数量和组成会发生改变,但要正确理解这些变化的意义,必须了解不同的分离方法如何影响EV的特征、蛋白质组和鞘脂组。在此,我们比较了使用超速离心法(UC)、聚乙二醇沉淀法、声捕获法、尺寸排阻色谱法(SEC)和免疫亲和捕获法,从4名健康供体以及6名心肌梗死患者发病时和心肌梗死后1个月的乏血小板血浆中分离出的血浆EV。通过纳米颗粒跟踪分析(NTA)、蛋白质印迹法、透射电子显微镜(TEM)、EV蛋白质阵列、非靶向蛋白质组学(液相色谱-串联质谱法)和靶向鞘脂组学(液相色谱-串联质谱法)对分离出的EV进行评估。在心肌梗死患者中应用这五种不同的血浆EV分离方法表明,血浆EV分离方法的选择会影响区分心肌梗死后血浆EV浓度升高的能力、EV货物(EV蛋白质和鞘脂组学)的富集以及与心肌梗死后6个月通过心脏磁共振成像确定的梗死面积大小的相关性。尽管每种方法都存在选择偏倚,但使用所有方法均可检测到核心的EV相关蛋白质和脂质。然而,本研究强调了每种分离方法都有其自身的特点,这使得临床研究中不同技术获取的数据比较存在问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8833/11080728/decef1f9b239/JEX2-1-e66-g007.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验