• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comments on "sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance" by Chen and Heitjan.对Chen和Heitjan所著《不完全依从性临床试验中估计量的敏感性》的评论
Int J Biostat. 2024 Jul 29;20(2):435-436. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2023-0127. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.
2
Sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance.不完全依从性临床试验中估计量的敏感性。
Int J Biostat. 2023 Jun 28;20(1):57-67. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2022-0105. eCollection 2024 May 1.
3
Estimation of treatment efficacy with complier average causal effects (CACE) in a randomized stepped wedge trial.在一项随机阶梯式楔形试验中,使用符合平均因果效应(CACE)估计治疗效果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 May 1;179(9):1134-42. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu015. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
4
Beyond intent to treat (ITT): A complier average causal effect (CACE) estimation primer.超越意向治疗(ITT):遵从者平均因果效应(CACE)估计入门。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Feb;60:7-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
5
Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data.存在不依从性和完全不可忽略缺失数据的随机试验中因果效应的可识别性与估计
Biometrics. 2009 Sep;65(3):675-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01120.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
6
Estimating the Complier Average Causal Effect in a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials With Binary Outcomes Accounting for Noncompliance: A Generalized Linear Latent and Mixed Model Approach.在针对二分类结局的随机临床试验的荟萃分析中估计遵从者平均因果效应:考虑不遵从的广义线性潜在和混合模型方法。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 1;191(1):220-229. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab238.
7
Model misspecification sensitivity analysis in estimating causal effects of interventions with non-compliance.在估计存在不依从性的干预措施的因果效应时的模型误设敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2002 Nov 15;21(21):3161-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.1267.
8
Estimands in clinical trials of complex disease processes.复杂疾病过程临床试验中的估计目标。
Clin Trials. 2024 Oct;21(5):604-611. doi: 10.1177/17407745241268054. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
9
A Bayesian hierarchical model estimating CACE in meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with noncompliance.一种用于在存在不依从性的随机临床试验荟萃分析中估计CACE的贝叶斯分层模型。
Biometrics. 2019 Sep;75(3):978-987. doi: 10.1111/biom.13028. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Assessing complier average causal effects from longitudinal trials with multiple endpoints and treatment noncompliance: An application to a study of Arthritis Health Journal.评估具有多个终点和治疗不依从性的纵向试验中的遵从平均因果效应:关节炎健康杂志研究的应用。
Stat Med. 2022 Jun 15;41(13):2448-2465. doi: 10.1002/sim.9364. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple discoveries in causal inference: LATE for the party.因果推断中的多项发现:局部平均处理效应(LATE)也来凑热闹。
Chance (N Y). 2024;37(2):21-25. doi: 10.1080/09332480.2024.2348956. Epub 2024 May 2.
2
Sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance.不完全依从性临床试验中估计量的敏感性。
Int J Biostat. 2023 Jun 28;20(1):57-67. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2022-0105. eCollection 2024 May 1.
3
Partial Identification of the Average Treatment Effect Using Instrumental Variables: Review of Methods for Binary Instruments, Treatments, and Outcomes.使用工具变量对平均治疗效果进行部分识别:二元工具变量、治疗方法和结果的方法综述
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(522):933-947. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1434530. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
4
Sensitivity analyses for average treatment effects when outcome is censored by death in instrumental variable models.工具变量模型中当结局因死亡而被截尾时平均治疗效应的敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2019 Jun 15;38(13):2303-2316. doi: 10.1002/sim.8117. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Estimating causal effects of treatment in RCTs with provider and subject noncompliance.在存在提供者和对象不依从的 RCT 中估计治疗的因果效应。
Stat Med. 2019 Feb 28;38(5):738-750. doi: 10.1002/sim.8012. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Latent class instrumental variables: a clinical and biostatistical perspective.潜在类别工具变量:临床与生物统计学视角
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 15;35(1):147-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.6612. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
7
Clarifying the role of principal stratification in the paired availability design.阐明主要分层在配对可用性设计中的作用。
Int J Biostat. 2011;7(1):25. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1338. Epub 2011 May 20.
8
Principal stratification in causal inference.因果推断中的主分层
Biometrics. 2002 Mar;58(1):21-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00021.x.
9
The paired availability design: a proposal for evaluating epidural analgesia during labor.配对可及性设计:一项评估分娩期硬膜外镇痛的建议。
Stat Med. 1994 Nov 15;13(21):2269-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780132108.

对Chen和Heitjan所著《不完全依从性临床试验中估计量的敏感性》的评论

Comments on "sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance" by Chen and Heitjan.

作者信息

Baker Stuart G, Lindeman Karen S

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9789, USA.

Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Int J Biostat. 2024 Jul 29;20(2):435-436. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2023-0127. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1515/ijb-2023-0127
PMID:39069742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11661933/
Abstract

Chen and Heitjan (Sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance. Int J Biostat. 2023) used linear extrapolation to estimate the population average causal effect (PACE) from the complier average causal effect (CACE) in multiple randomized trials with all-or-none compliance. For extrapolating from CACE to PACE in this setting and in the paired availability design involving different availabilities of treatment among before-and-after studies, we recommend the sensitivity analysis in Baker and Lindeman (J Causal Inference, 2013) because it is not restricted to a linear model, as it involves various random effect and trend models.

摘要

陈和海特扬(《不完全依从性临床试验中估计量的敏感性。国际生物统计学杂志》,2023年)在多项全有或全无依从性的随机试验中,使用线性外推法从依从者平均因果效应(CACE)估计总体平均因果效应(PACE)。对于在此情形下以及在前后研究中涉及不同治疗可及性的配对可及性设计中从CACE外推到PACE,我们推荐贝克和林德曼(《因果推断杂志》,2013年)中的敏感性分析,因为它不限于线性模型,它涉及各种随机效应和趋势模型。