University of Tübingen, Medical Faculty, Institute of Health Sciences, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Institute for Midwifery Science, Cologne, Germany.
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Jun 17;41(3):Doc33. doi: 10.3205/zma001688. eCollection 2024.
The current situation in Germany is characterised by significant differences between the two types of higher education institutions offering bachelor's degree programmes in midwifery at both universities of applied sciences and universities. These differences are noticeable in admission procedures, resource allocation, content focus and competence assessment at the respective institutions, which in turn result in heterogeneous study experiences. This article highlights the challenges currently facing bachelor degree programmes and the academic qualification of midwives, and identifies future requirements for the development of degree programmes in theory and practice as well as theory-practice transfer, and assessment formats. Furthermore, this article covers the content-related and structural-organisational requirements to develop in-depth academic skills grounded in theory teaching, the facilitation of clinical placements at an academic level, the training of qualified practical instructors and the development of applicable competence-based assessment formats, especially for the state exam. The development of a standardised, high-quality academic education for midwives in Germany requires networking of the different academic sites/locations to exchange experiences in teaching/learning and assessment formats. Furthermore, it can facilitate the development of a standardised competence-oriented model and core curriculum as well as the definition of quality criteria and standards for study programmes of midwifery science. The Midwifery Science Committee (AHW) in the DACH Assoviation for Medical Education (GMA) offers an optimal platform for cooperation between the different universities. The existing challenges for the further professional development of midwives can only be overcome by collaboration and pooled expertise.
德国目前的情况是,提供助产士学士学位课程的两种类型的高等教育机构之间存在显著差异,这些机构分别是应用科学大学和综合性大学。在招生程序、资源分配、内容重点和各自机构的能力评估方面,这些差异显而易见,这反过来又导致了学习经历的多样化。本文强调了当前学士学位课程和助产士学术资格所面临的挑战,并确定了未来在理论和实践以及理论-实践转化以及评估模式方面发展学位课程的要求。此外,本文还涵盖了与内容相关的和结构组织的要求,以发展深入的学术技能,这些技能基于理论教学,促进在学术水平上的临床实习,培训合格的实践指导者,并开发适用的基于能力的评估模式,特别是针对国家考试。德国为助产士制定标准化、高质量的学术教育需要将不同的学术场所/地点联系起来,以交流教学/学习和评估模式方面的经验。此外,它可以促进标准化的以能力为导向的模式和核心课程的发展,以及为助产科学的学习计划定义质量标准和标准。在医学教育 DACH 协会(GMA)中的助产科学委员会(AHW)为不同大学之间的合作提供了一个最佳平台。只有通过协作和共享专业知识,才能克服进一步专业发展的助产士面临的现有挑战。