Suppr超能文献

绝经后妇女的激素治疗与生物衰老。

Hormone Therapy and Biological Aging in Postmenopausal Women.

机构信息

Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

National Institute of Health Data Science at Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2430839. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30839.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Menopause is associated with biological aging, and hormone therapy (HT) is associated with health outcomes in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between HT use and discrepancies between chronological and biological age in postmenopausal women as well as the potential modifying role of socioeconomic status (SES).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based, retrospective cohort study included postmenopausal women registered in the UK Biobank. A baseline survey on HT use and biological aging biomarkers was conducted from March 2006 to October 2010. Data analyses were conducted in December 2023.

EXPOSURES

Information regarding HT use, the age at starting HT, and HT duration was collected via a touchscreen questionnaire. SES was evaluated by education, family income, occupation, and the Townsend Deprivation Index.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Biological aging discrepancy was evaluated using validated phenotypic age, which was calculated using chronological age and 9 biomarkers measured at baseline. All-cause and cause-specific mortality were also assessed.

RESULTS

Among the 117 763 postmenopausal women (mean [SD] age, 60.2 [5.4] years), 47 461 (40.3%) ever used HT. The mean phenotypic age was 52.1 (7.9) years. Ever use of HT was associated with a smaller biological aging discrepancy than never use of HT (β, -0.17 years; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.10 years). This smaller aging discrepancy was more evident in those who started HT at age 55 years or older (β, -0.32 years; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.15 years) and in those who used HT for 4 to 8 years (β, -0.25 years; 95% CI, -0.35 to -0.15 years). The association between HT and a smaller aging discrepancy was more evident in women with low SES, with a significant interaction observed for education (higher education: β, -0.08 years [95% CI, -0.17 to 0.01]; other education: β, -0.23 [95% CI, -0.32 to -0.14] years; P for interaction = .02). Phenotypic aging discrepancy mediated 12.7% (95% CI, 6.3% to 23.9%) of the association between HT and all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, postmenopausal women with historical HT use were biologically younger than those not receiving HT, with a more evident association observed in those with low SES. The biological aging discrepancy mediated the association between HT and decreased mortality. Promoting HT in postmenopausal women could be important for healthy aging.

摘要

重要性

绝经与生物衰老有关,激素治疗(HT)与绝经后妇女的健康结果有关。

目的

评估 HT 使用与绝经后妇女的实际年龄和生物年龄之间的差异之间的关系,以及社会经济地位(SES)的潜在调节作用。

设计、地点和参与者:本研究是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,纳入了英国生物银行的绝经后妇女。从 2006 年 3 月至 2010 年 10 月进行了关于 HT 使用和生物衰老生物标志物的基线调查。数据分析于 2023 年 12 月进行。

暴露

通过触摸屏问卷收集关于 HT 使用、开始 HT 的年龄和 HT 持续时间的信息。SES 通过教育、家庭收入、职业和汤森剥夺指数进行评估。

主要结果和测量

使用经过验证的表型年龄评估生物老化差异,该年龄通过使用年龄和基线时测量的 9 种生物标志物计算得出。还评估了全因和特定原因的死亡率。

结果

在 117763 名绝经后妇女(平均[SD]年龄 60.2[5.4]岁)中,47461 名(40.3%)曾使用 HT。平均表型年龄为 52.1(7.9)岁。与从未使用 HT 的妇女相比,曾使用 HT 的妇女的生物老化差异较小(β,-0.17 岁;95%置信区间,-0.23 至-0.10 岁)。这种较小的老化差异在那些在 55 岁或以上开始 HT 的患者中更为明显(β,-0.32 岁;95%置信区间,-0.48 至-0.15 岁),以及使用 HT 4 至 8 年的患者中更为明显(β,-0.25 岁;95%置信区间,-0.35 至-0.15 岁)。HT 与较小的老化差异之间的关联在 SES 较低的妇女中更为明显,在教育方面观察到显著的交互作用(高等教育:β,-0.08 岁[95%置信区间,-0.17 至 0.01];其他教育:β,-0.23 岁[95%置信区间,-0.32 至-0.14];P 交互 = .02)。表型老化差异在 HT 与全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率之间的关联中介导了 12.7%(95%置信区间,6.3%至 23.9%)。

结论和相关性

在这项研究中,有历史 HT 使用的绝经后妇女的生物学年龄比未接受 HT 的妇女年轻,在 SES 较低的妇女中观察到更明显的关联。生物老化差异介导了 HT 与死亡率降低之间的关联。在绝经后妇女中推广 HT 可能对健康衰老很重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d6/11362863/8f7c1b9cb923/jamanetwopen-e2430839-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验