• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手臂辅助系统(MAKO)在髋关节翻修手术中的应用。

The Use of the Robotic Arm-Assisted System (MAKO) for Hip Revision Surgery.

作者信息

Dretakis Konstantinos, Raptis Konstantinos, Koutserimpas Christos

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, "Hygeia" General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, "251" Hellenic Air Force General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(8):608-611. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.77543.3582.

DOI:10.22038/ABJS.2024.77543.3582
PMID:39211571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353149/
Abstract

The robotic arm-assisted system (MAKO) has pioneered a transformative approach to hip joint restoration, excelling in reinstating innate hip joint anatomy and biomechanics. This case represents the initial application of the system in revision surgery following a cut-out complication. A 69-year-old female, previously independent and mobile, presented with left hip pain. X-rays revealed a cut-out complication of the proximal nail, necessitating revision to total hip arthroplasty due to the patient's prior activity level and implant prominence. Utilizing the robotic system, preoperative planning accurately identified limb length discrepancy and guided implant sizing. The system facilitated precise acetabular reaming and optimal component placement. The patient regained functional independence. This report also underscores the system's potential for accurate acetabulum component placement and restoration of hip joint anatomy and biomechanics in revision cases. Future advancements in this technology may expand its role in complex reconstructions and revisions, further enhancing patient outcomes in hip arthroplasty.

摘要

机器人手臂辅助系统(MAKO)开创了一种变革性的髋关节修复方法,在恢复髋关节的固有解剖结构和生物力学方面表现出色。本病例代表了该系统在因内固定穿出并发症而进行的翻修手术中的首次应用。一名69岁的女性,此前生活自理且行动自如,出现左髋部疼痛。X线检查显示近端髓内钉穿出并发症,鉴于患者先前的活动水平和植入物突出情况,需要翻修为全髋关节置换术。利用机器人系统,术前规划准确识别了肢体长度差异并指导植入物尺寸选择。该系统有助于精确的髋臼扩孔和优化假体放置。患者恢复了功能独立性。本报告还强调了该系统在翻修病例中准确放置髋臼假体以及恢复髋关节解剖结构和生物力学的潜力。这项技术未来的进展可能会扩大其在复杂重建和翻修中的作用,进一步改善髋关节置换术患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbfb/11353149/48ced16803cd/ABJS-12-608-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbfb/11353149/1c813fc6c20b/ABJS-12-608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbfb/11353149/f9dbf68a1930/ABJS-12-608-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbfb/11353149/48ced16803cd/ABJS-12-608-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbfb/11353149/1c813fc6c20b/ABJS-12-608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbfb/11353149/f9dbf68a1930/ABJS-12-608-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbfb/11353149/48ced16803cd/ABJS-12-608-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Use of the Robotic Arm-Assisted System (MAKO) for Hip Revision Surgery.机器人手臂辅助系统(MAKO)在髋关节翻修手术中的应用。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(8):608-611. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.77543.3582.
2
[Application of Mako robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip].Mako机器人辅助全髋关节置换术在发育性髋关节发育不良中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 15;35(10):1233-1239. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202105013.
3
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Severe Acetabular Defect: A Preliminary Exploration and Attempt of Robotic-Assisted Technology.翻修伴有严重髋臼缺陷的全髋关节置换术:机器人辅助技术的初步探索和尝试。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1912-1917. doi: 10.1111/os.13368. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
4
[Learning curve and short-term clinical outcomes of Mako robotic-assisted direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty].[Mako机器人辅助直接前路全髋关节置换术的学习曲线及短期临床疗效]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 4;102(1):49-55. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210806-01754.
5
Mako robotic-arm-assisted total hip and total knee arthroplasty outcomes in an orthopedic oncology setting: A case series.在骨科肿瘤环境中Mako机器人手臂辅助全髋关节和全膝关节置换术的结果:病例系列
J Orthop. 2023 Oct 26;46:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.021. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Does acetabular robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty with femoral navigation improve clinical outcomes at 1-year post-operative? A case-matched propensity score study comparing 98 robotic-assisted versus 98 manual implantation hip arthroplasties.采用股骨导航的髋臼机器人辅助全髋关节置换术在术后1年时能否改善临床疗效?一项病例匹配倾向评分研究,比较98例机器人辅助与98例人工植入髋关节置换术。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Feb;109(1):103477. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103477. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
7
Restoring Hip Joint Anatomy With the Robotic Arm-Assisted System in Hip Fractures: Expanding the Applications for Hip Surgery.使用机器人手臂辅助系统恢复髋部骨折的髋关节解剖结构:拓展髋关节手术的应用范围
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Apr 17;27:101381. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101381. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
[A comparative study of MAKO robotic arm assisted total hip arthroplasty and traditional total hip arthroplasty through posterolateral approach].MAKO机器人手臂辅助经后外侧入路全髋关节置换术与传统全髋关节置换术的对比研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 15;34(7):883-888. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201911077.
9
[Short-term effectiveness of Mako robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty via posterolateral approach].[Mako机器人辅助后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的短期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 15;35(10):1227-1232. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202105120.
10
Is the Acetabular Cup Orientation Different in Robot-Assisted and Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty With Right-Handed Surgeons Using an Anterolateral Approach?对于使用前外侧入路的右利手外科医生,机器人辅助全髋关节置换术和传统全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯的方向是否不同?
Cureus. 2023 Jul 23;15(7):e42335. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42335. eCollection 2023 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted hip and knee revision arthroplasty: A scoping review.机器人辅助髋关节和膝关节翻修置换术:一项范围综述。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 May 26;12(2):e70285. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70285. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术综述。
Biomed Eng Lett. 2023 Aug 30;13(4):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00312-9. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Modified Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Surgery (ALMIS) for Total Hip Replacement: Anatomical Considerations, Range of Motion and Clinical Outcomes.改良前外侧微创全髋关节置换术:解剖学考量、活动范围及临床疗效
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Aug 23;59(9):1520. doi: 10.3390/medicina59091520.
3
Robotic-assisted revision total joint arthroplasty: a state-of-the-art scoping review.
机器人辅助翻修全关节置换术:一项最新的范围综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Jan 27;8(1):18-25. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0105.
4
Robotics in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Current Concepts.全髋关节置换术中的机器人技术:当前概念
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 10;11(22):6674. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226674.
5
A propensity score-matched comparison between Mako robotic arm-assisted system and conventional technique in total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip.在髋关节发育不良继发骨关节炎患者行全髋关节置换术中,比较 Mako 机器人辅助系统与传统技术的倾向评分匹配研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 May;143(5):2755-2761. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04524-z. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
6
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Severe Acetabular Defect: A Preliminary Exploration and Attempt of Robotic-Assisted Technology.翻修伴有严重髋臼缺陷的全髋关节置换术:机器人辅助技术的初步探索和尝试。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1912-1917. doi: 10.1111/os.13368. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
7
Total Hip Arthroplasty with Robotic Arm Assistance for Precise Cup Positioning: A Case-Control Study.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术精准髋臼杯定位:一项病例对照研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):1498-1505. doi: 10.1111/os.13334. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
8
Primary Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 501 Hips With 44-Month Follow-up.机器人辅助初次全髋关节置换术:501 髋 44 个月随访分析。
Orthopedics. 2021 Mar-Apr;44(2):70-76. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20210201-01. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Robotic-Assisted versus Manually Implanted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiographic Comparison.机器人辅助与手工植入全髋关节置换术:临床与影像学比较
Surg Technol Int. 2020 Nov 28;37:371-376.
10
The Mako ™ robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach: surgical technique, skills and pitfals.Mako™ 机器人辅助全髋关节置换术经直接前入路:手术技术、技巧及陷阱。
Acta Biomed. 2020 May 30;91(4-S):21-30. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9659.