Vásquez-Venegas Constanza, Sotomayor Camilo G, Ramos Baltasar, Castañeda Víctor, Pereira Gonzalo, Cabrera-Vives Guillermo, Härtel Steffen
Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Concepción, Concepción 4030000, Chile.
Laboratory for Scientific Image Analysis SCIAN-Lab, Integrative Biology Program, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago 8380453, Chile.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 4;13(17):5231. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175231.
The accurate quantification of ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and consolidation volumes has prognostic value in COVID-19 patients. Nevertheless, the accurate manual quantification of the corresponding volumes remains a time-consuming task. Deep learning (DL) has demonstrated good performance in the segmentation of normal lung parenchyma and COVID-19 pneumonia. We introduce a Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) strategy for the segmentation of normal lung parenchyma and COVID-19 pneumonia that is both time efficient and quality effective. Furthermore, we propose a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to classify GGO and consolidation based on a probabilistic characterization and case-sensitive thresholds. A total of 65 Computed Tomography (CT) scans from 64 patients, acquired between March 2020 and June 2021, were randomly selected. We pretrained a 3D-UNet with an international dataset and implemented a HITL strategy to refine the local dataset with delineations by teams of medical interns, radiology residents, and radiologists. Following each HITL cycle, 3D-UNet was re-trained until the Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSCs) reached the quality criteria set by radiologists (DSC = 0.95/0.8 for the normal lung parenchyma/COVID-19 pneumonia). For the probabilistic characterization, a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) was fitted to the Hounsfield Units (HUs) of voxels from the CT scans of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia on the assumption that two distinct populations were superimposed: one for GGO and one for consolidation. Manual delineation of the normal lung parenchyma and COVID-19 pneumonia was performed by seven teams on 65 CT scans from 64 patients (56 ± 16 years old ( ± ), 46 males, 62 with reported symptoms). Automated lung/COVID-19 pneumonia segmentation with a DSC > 0.96/0.81 was achieved after three HITL cycles. The HITL strategy improved the DSC by 0.2 and 0.5 for the normal lung parenchyma and COVID-19 pneumonia segmentation, respectively. The distribution of the patient-specific thresholds derived from the GMM yielded a mean of -528.4 ± 99.5 HU (μ ± σ), which is below most of the reported fixed HU thresholds. The HITL strategy allowed for fast and effective annotations, thereby enhancing the quality of segmentation for a local CT dataset. Probabilistic characterization of COVID-19 pneumonia by the GMM enabled patient-specific segmentation of GGO and consolidation. The combination of both approaches is essential to gain confidence in DL approaches in our local environment. The patient-specific probabilistic approach, when combined with the automatic quantification of COVID-19 imaging findings, enhances the understanding of GGO and consolidation during the course of the disease, with the potential to improve the accuracy of clinical predictions.
磨玻璃影(GGOs)和实变体积的准确量化对新冠肺炎患者具有预后价值。然而,对相应体积进行准确的手动量化仍是一项耗时的任务。深度学习(DL)在正常肺实质和新冠肺炎肺炎的分割中表现良好。我们引入了一种人在回路(HITL)策略用于正常肺实质和新冠肺炎肺炎的分割,该策略既高效又能保证质量。此外,我们提出了一种高斯混合模型(GMM),基于概率特征和病例敏感阈值对GGO和实变进行分类。随机选取了2020年3月至2021年6月期间64例患者的65份计算机断层扫描(CT)图像。我们使用国际数据集对3D-UNet进行预训练,并实施HITL策略,由医学实习生、放射科住院医师和放射科医生团队通过描绘来完善本地数据集。在每个HITL循环之后,重新训练3D-UNet,直到骰子相似系数(DSC)达到放射科医生设定的质量标准(正常肺实质/新冠肺炎肺炎的DSC = 0.95/0.8)。为了进行概率特征分析,在假设存在两个不同群体叠加的情况下,将高斯混合模型(GMM)应用于新冠肺炎肺炎患者CT扫描图像中体素的亨氏单位(HUs):一个用于GGO,一个用于实变。七支团队对64例患者(年龄56±16岁(±),男性46例,62例有报告症状)的65份CT扫描图像进行了正常肺实质和新冠肺炎肺炎的手动描绘。经过三个HITL循环后,实现了DSC>0.96/0.81的自动肺/新冠肺炎肺炎分割。HITL策略分别将正常肺实质和新冠肺炎肺炎分割的DSC提高了0.2和0.5。从GMM得出的患者特异性阈值分布的平均值为-528.4±99.5 HU(μ±σ),低于大多数报告的固定HU阈值。HITL策略允许进行快速有效的标注,从而提高本地CT数据集的分割质量。GMM对新冠肺炎肺炎的概率特征分析实现了GGO和实变的患者特异性分割。两种方法的结合对于在我们当地环境中增强对DL方法的信心至关重要。患者特异性概率方法与新冠肺炎影像学表现的自动量化相结合,增强了对疾病过程中GGO和实变的理解,有可能提高临床预测的准确性。