• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估用于诱捕野猪(Sus scrofa)的步枪弹和弹丸的安乐死效果。

Evaluation of rifle cartridge and shot placement for euthanizing feral swine (Sus scrofa) in traps.

机构信息

USDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.

USDA/APHIS/Wildlife Services, National Feral Swine Damage Management Program, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae278.

DOI:10.1093/jas/skae278
PMID:39289882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11484799/
Abstract

Feral swine are a highly destructive invasive species around the globe. Wildlife managers commonly trap and euthanize feral swine with firearms to reduce their adverse impacts. The utility of euthanizing domestic swine with firearms has been considered when emergency situations arise such as in the event of a foreign animal disease outbreak in domestic swine. Similarly, the rapid depopulation of domestic swine facilities became necessary when the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted pork production in 2020. Evaluation of the effects of caliber, cartridge, size of feral swine, and shot placement on effectiveness and safety of the method is needed. We collected data from feral swine euthanized in traps on how those variables influenced the effectiveness in time to death and number of shots required and safety risks based on the occurrence of bullet pass-through (i.e., bullet exiting the pig). We tested 3 cartridges of 2 calibers (0.22 long rifle, 0.22 Winchester magnum rimfire, and 0.308 Winchester) delivered from a rifle with 3 shot placements targeting the brain. From 570 euthanization events, we calculated an average time to death of 100.06 (SD = 29.24) s, with larger feral swine taking slightly longer. Most feral swine (73%) were euthanized with a single shot but averaged 1.28 (SD = 0.48) shots overall. Safety risks from pass-through shots were more common when using the 0.308 Winchester cartridge, and when rear and side shot placements were used. Overall, we recommend a 0.22 long rifle cartridge and frontal shot placement as an effective and safe option for euthanizing feral swine in traps, and likely for domestic swine of similar size and shot distances.

摘要

野猪是全球极具破坏性的入侵物种。野生动物管理人员通常使用枪支诱捕和安乐死野猪,以减少其负面影响。在发生外来动物疾病暴发等紧急情况时,已经考虑过使用枪支安乐死家猪,例如在 2020 年 COVID-19 大流行扰乱猪肉生产期间。同样,当国内养猪场的猪迅速减少时,也需要迅速采取行动。需要评估口径、弹药、野猪大小和射击位置对该方法效果和安全性的影响。我们从诱捕器中安乐死的野猪身上收集数据,研究这些变量如何影响致死时间、所需射击次数以及基于子弹穿透(即子弹离开猪)的安全风险。我们测试了 3 种口径(0.22 长步枪、0.22 温彻斯特马格南边缘发火和 0.308 温彻斯特)的 3 种弹药,从一支步枪上以 3 个射击位置瞄准大脑。在 570 次安乐死事件中,我们计算出平均死亡时间为 100.06(SD=29.24)秒,体型较大的野猪需要的时间略长。大多数野猪(73%)只用一枪就安乐死,但总共平均需要 1.28(SD=0.48)发子弹。使用 0.308 温彻斯特弹药和使用后膛和侧面射击位置时,子弹穿透造成的安全风险更为常见。总体而言,我们建议在诱捕器中使用 0.22 长步枪弹药和正面射击位置,作为一种有效和安全的方法来安乐死野猪,对于类似大小和射击距离的家猪也可能适用。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of rifle cartridge and shot placement for euthanizing feral swine (Sus scrofa) in traps.评估用于诱捕野猪(Sus scrofa)的步枪弹和弹丸的安乐死效果。
J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae278.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.

本文引用的文献

1
Validating the effectiveness of alternative euthanasia techniques using penetrating captive bolt guns in mature swine (Sus scrofa domesticus).验证使用穿透式固定头击毙器对成熟猪(Sus scrofa domesticus)实施安乐死的效果。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Mar 1;99(3). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab052.
2
A Systematic Literature Review on Depopulation Methods for Swine.猪群扑杀方法的系统文献综述
Animals (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;10(11):2161. doi: 10.3390/ani10112161.
3
Reconsidering humaneness.重新思考人道。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Oct;34(5):1107-1113. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13489. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
4
Achieving humane outcomes in killing livestock by free bullet I: Penetrating brain injury.通过自由射击使牲畜人道死亡:I. 穿透性脑损伤
Can Vet J. 2019 May;60(5):524-531.
5
Assessment of humaneness using gunshot targeting the brain and cervical spine for cervid depopulation under field conditions.在野外条件下使用枪击头部和颈部脊椎的方法对有蹄类动物进行种群控制时对人道性的评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0213200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213200. eCollection 2019.
6
Defining animal welfare standards in hunting: body mass determines thresholds for incapacitation time and flight distance.定义狩猎中的动物福利标准:体重决定致昏时间和飞行距离的阈值。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 13;8(1):13786. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32102-0.
7
Evaluation of methods of rapid mass killing of segregated early weaned piglets.隔离早期断奶仔猪快速批量扑杀方法的评估
Can Vet J. 2011 Jul;52(7):753-8.
8
Killing of animals for disease control purposes.为疾病控制目的宰杀动物。
Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Aug;24(2):711-22.
9
The use of a shotgun for the emergency slaughter or euthanasia of large mature pigs.使用猎枪对大型成年猪进行紧急屠宰或安乐死。
N Z Vet J. 1995 Aug;43(4):134-7. doi: 10.1080/00480169.1995.35872.
10
Evaluation of methods for the euthanasia of cattle in a foreign animal disease outbreak.外来动物疾病暴发中牛安乐死方法的评估
Can Vet J. 1995 Mar;36(3):160-5.