• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼前节 OCT 和 Scheimpflug 成像的角膜密度测量比较。

Corneal densitometry measurements comparison between anterior segment OCT and scheimpflug imaging.

机构信息

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

DIMEC, Ophthalmology Unit, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna IT, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 25;44(1):392. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03309-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10792-024-03309-0
PMID:39320570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11424699/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the repeatability of corneal densitometry (CD) measurements obtained using both an anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) device and a Scheimpflug camera system, while also assessing the level of agreement. The study also sought to investigate the correlation of CD with age, gender, and central corneal thickness (CCT) in normal eyes.

METHODS

CD measurements were obtained using the Casia 2 and the Pentacam AXL Wave. Data were collected on Total Corneal Densitometry and 4 concentric corneal annular areas, these are referred to as zone 1, denoting the central area, through to zone 4, designating the outermost peripheral region. Repeatability was assessed using intra-session test-retest variability, coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The agreement was evaluated using Bland-Altman plots. Correlation analysis was performed between CD, age, gender, and CCT.

RESULTS

The study included 96 healthy volunteers. The Casia 2 demonstrated high repeatability with ICC values exceeding 0.9 in all the corneal zones and lower CoV values compared to the Pentacam AXL Wave (ranging from 1.07% to 2.25% for Casia 2 and from 1.91% to 6.89% for Pentacam).95% LoA were within ± 2 standard deviation from the average mean except from zone 1 (± 2.42).However, the measurements showed a consistent bias among all the corneal zones. CD values were positively correlated with age, except for zone 1 with the Pentacam (p = 0.083).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the Casia 2 can be a reliable tool for assessing corneal transparency in healthy individuals, however its measurements are not interchangeable with those provided by the Pentacam. The AS-OCT device may be more sensitive in detecting subtle age-related changes in CD within the central zone.

摘要

目的

评估和比较使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)设备和 Scheimpflug 相机系统获得的角膜密度(CD)测量值的重复性,同时评估一致性水平。该研究还旨在探讨 CD 与正常眼中年龄、性别和中央角膜厚度(CCT)的相关性。

方法

使用 Casia 2 和 Pentacam AXL Wave 进行 CD 测量。收集总角膜密度和 4 个同心角膜环形区域的数据,这些区域分别表示中央区域(第 1 区)到最外层周边区域(第 4 区)。使用内-会话测试-重测变异性、变异系数(CoV)和组内相关系数(ICC)评估重复性。使用 Bland-Altman 图评估一致性。分析 CD、年龄、性别和 CCT 之间的相关性。

结果

该研究纳入了 96 名健康志愿者。Casia 2 在所有角膜区域的 ICC 值均超过 0.9,且 CoV 值低于 Pentacam AXL Wave(Casia 2 为 1.07%-2.25%,Pentacam 为 1.91%-6.89%),除第 1 区外(±2.42),95%的 LoA 在平均均值的±2 个标准差内。然而,所有角膜区域的测量值均显示出一致的偏差。CD 值与年龄呈正相关,但 Pentacam 的第 1 区除外(p=0.083)。

结论

结果表明,Casia 2 可作为评估健康个体角膜透明度的可靠工具,但与 Pentacam 提供的测量值不可互换。AS-OCT 设备在检测中央区域 CD 与年龄相关的细微变化方面可能更为敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/4d3a6668b882/10792_2024_3309_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/52ef6785971d/10792_2024_3309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/3e35954a5449/10792_2024_3309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/8ae7cf837b95/10792_2024_3309_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/4d3a6668b882/10792_2024_3309_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/52ef6785971d/10792_2024_3309_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/3e35954a5449/10792_2024_3309_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/8ae7cf837b95/10792_2024_3309_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d8/11424699/4d3a6668b882/10792_2024_3309_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Corneal densitometry measurements comparison between anterior segment OCT and scheimpflug imaging.眼前节 OCT 和 Scheimpflug 成像的角膜密度测量比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 25;44(1):392. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03309-0.
2
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.标准超声角膜测厚法、角膜地形图、眼压-角膜测厚法及眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jul;43(7):866-872. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1461910. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
3
Repeatability assessment of anterior segment measurements in myopic patients using an anterior segment OCT with placido corneal topography and agreement with a swept-source OCT.使用带有普拉西多角膜地形图的眼前节光学相干断层扫描(OCT)对近视患者眼前节测量的可重复性评估以及与扫频源OCT的一致性
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03448-z.
4
Comparative study of anterior segment measurement with Pentacam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.Pentacam 与眼前节光学相干断层扫描仪测量眼前节的对比研究。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;45(6):627-31. doi: 10.3129/i10-068.
5
Comparison of Scheimpflug Corneal Tomography and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Measurements in Corneal Cystinosis: A Case Series.Scheimpflug 角膜断层成像术与眼前节光学相干断层扫描在角膜胱氨酸沉积症中的测量比较:病例系列。
Eye Contact Lens. 2024 Jul 1;50(7):321-328. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001087. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
6
Repeatability and agreement of two swept-source optical coherence tomographers and scheimpflug imaging for measurements of corneal curvature.两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪和Scheimpflug 成像测量角膜曲率的重复性和一致性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03696-z.
7
Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry.高分辨率Scheimpflug 成像、傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描和超声角膜测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug;90(5):449-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.01947.x. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
8
[Repeatability and agreement of corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam Scheimpflug photography and Visante optical coherence tomography].[Pentacam 眼前节分析系统 Scheimpflug 摄影及 Visante 光学相干断层扫描测量角膜厚度的重复性与一致性]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;49(3):250-6.
9
Agreement and Repeatability of Corneal Thickness and Radius among Three Different Corneal Measurement Devices.三种不同角膜测量设备测量的角膜厚度和曲率半径的一致性和可重复性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Oct 1;98(10):1196-1202. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001785.
10
A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness.Scheimpflug 成像与光学相干断层扫描测量角膜厚度的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Oct;120(10):1951-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.022. Epub 2013 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of corneal and lens density measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2 in myopes.Pentacam 和 CASIA2 在近视眼中测量角膜和晶状体密度的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03199-3.
2
Corneal aberrations, densitometry on scheimpflug imaging, and visual acuity after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.深板层角膜移植术后的角膜像差、Scheimpflug成像密度测量及视力
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 28:11206721221128863. doi: 10.1177/11206721221128863.
3
Repeatability of Corneal Densitometry Measurements using a Scheimpflug Camera in Healthy Normal Corneas.
使用Scheimpflug相机测量健康正常角膜的角膜密度计测量的可重复性。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 16;34(1):50-55. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_173_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
4
Corneal Densitometry Assessed With Scheimpflug Camera in Healthy Corneas and Correlation With Specular Microscopy Values and Age.使用Scheimpflug相机评估健康角膜的角膜密度测定及其与镜面显微镜检查值和年龄的相关性。
Cornea. 2022 Jan 1;41(1):60-68. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002722.
5
Corneal optical density in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy determined by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量 Fuchs 内皮营养不良的角膜光学密度。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;31(4):1771-1778. doi: 10.1177/1120672120944796. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
Corneal Densitometry in Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病中的角膜密度测定法
Cornea. 2020 Aug;39(8):968-974. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002310.
7
Methods for Assessing Corneal Opacity.评估角膜混浊的方法。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2019;34(4):205-210. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2019.1620796. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
8
Corneal densitometry in high myopia.高度近视中的角膜密度测定法
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 25;18(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0851-x.
9
Cataract surgery in patients with corneal opacities.角膜混浊患者的白内障手术。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0765-7.
10
Objective quantification of corneal haziness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描技术对角膜混浊进行客观量化。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 1;30(1):54-57. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.08.001. eCollection 2018 Mar.