Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚文化和语言多样化的老年群体获得老年护理服务障碍的范围综述

A scoping review of barriers to accessing aged care services for older adults from culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Australia.

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Department of Social Work, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):805. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05373-8.

Abstract

The ageing population of the culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) population is increasing in Australia. This is because the number of early migrants in Australia is ageing, coupled with increasing family reunification. This scoping review aimed to describe the nature and extent of research on the barriers to aged care services for CALD older adults in Australia using Penchansky and Thomas's Access to Care Framework of five A's dimensions: availability, accessibility, accommodation, affordability, and acceptability. Arksey and O'Malley's five-step scoping review framework was adopted to search 6 databases from inception till August 2024. Title/abstract and full-text screening were conducted using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with supplementary search of references from included articles to identify additional articles. Findings show that while all the five A's of access to care services were barriers for CALD older adults, accommodation and acceptability of services were the major areas of concern due to the lack of cultural sensitivity of such services in Australia. An additional barrier captured and termed as Awareness was noted in some of the included studies, highlighting the need to expand the five A's to 6 A's. Researchers, practitioners, and policymakers on ageing could leverage these findings to improve cultural practice sensitivities when supporting these populations.

摘要

澳大利亚的文化和语言多样化(CALD)人口正在老龄化。这是因为澳大利亚的早期移民人数正在老龄化,加上家庭团聚的增加。本范围综述旨在使用彭钱斯和托马斯的五个 A(可用性、可及性、适应性、可负担性和可接受性)护理服务获取框架,描述澳大利亚针对老年护理服务障碍的针对文化和语言多样化老年人的研究的性质和范围。采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的五步范围综述框架,从成立到 2024 年 8 月,在 6 个数据库中进行搜索。使用预先确定的纳入和排除标准进行标题/摘要和全文筛选,并从纳入的文章中补充搜索参考文献,以确定其他文章。研究结果表明,尽管所有五个获取护理服务的 A(可用性、可及性、适应性、可负担性和可接受性)都是 CALD 老年人的障碍,但由于澳大利亚此类服务缺乏文化敏感性,适应性和服务的可接受性是主要关注领域。在一些纳入的研究中还注意到了一个被称为“意识”的额外障碍,这强调了需要将五个 A 扩展到 6 个 A。研究人员、从业者和老龄化政策制定者可以利用这些发现,在支持这些人群时提高文化实践的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bfe/11446002/1183ad399d80/12877_2024_5373_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验