Kelly S A, Washington J A
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Oct;10(4):515-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.4.515-518.1979.
The Micro-Media Quad Enteric Panel and coding system were evaluated by comparing the identifications of 193 stock and 216 clinical isolates, representing 31 species of Enterobacteriaceae, with those provided by conventional methods. The results corresponded for 91% of the organisms if only the single or most probable identification was accepted and for 93% if the correct identification was listed as one of several possible, but not the most probable, identification by the coding system. With 73% of the isolates, the single identification provided by the coding system was correct, and in 20% of instances the correct identification was listed as the first of several choices in descending order of probability but requiring additional tests for differentiation. In most of the latter instances, these additional tests consisted of serological confirmation of salmonellae or shigellae. Discrepancies consisted of incorrect identifications (4%) and organisms with code numbers not appearing in the coding system (3%).
通过将代表31种肠杆菌科细菌的193株标准菌株和216株临床分离株的鉴定结果与传统方法提供的结果进行比较,对微媒体四联肠道菌鉴定板及编码系统进行了评估。如果只接受单一或最可能的鉴定结果,91%的菌株结果相符;如果编码系统将正确鉴定列为几种可能但并非最可能的鉴定结果之一,则93%的菌株结果相符。编码系统提供的单一鉴定结果在73%的分离株中是正确的,在20%的情况下,正确鉴定结果被列为按可能性降序排列的几种选择中的第一个,但需要额外的试验进行鉴别。在大多数后一种情况下,这些额外的试验包括沙门氏菌或志贺氏菌的血清学确认。差异包括错误鉴定(4%)和编码系统中未出现编号的菌株(3%)。