• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《Smart Tools 易感性问卷(STP-Q)土耳其语版的跨文化调适、信度和效度》。

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Smart Tools Proneness Questionnaire (STP-Q).

机构信息

Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.

Department of Occupational Therapy, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı, Turkiye.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 8;19(10):e0309299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309299. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0309299
PMID:39378201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11460675/
Abstract

This study elucidates the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Smart Tools Proneness Questionnaire (STP-Q), designed to probe into individuals' engagement with smart tools within the Turkish cultural milieu. Undertaking a rigorous adaptation process, this investigation aimed to ensure the questionnaire's relevance and intelligibility, subsequently, assessing its psychometric properties within a cohort of 387 participants. The exploratory factor analysis revealed a tripartite structure that reflects the original instrument, covering utilitarian use, hedonic and social use, and the inclination to delegate tasks. This congruity underscores the STP-Q's adeptness in capturing the complex dimensions of smart tool interaction across various contexts. Demonstrated by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.954 and a test-retest reliability index of 0.851, the results affirm the questionnaire's exceptional internal consistency and significant temporal stability. Further, the execution of convergent validity assessments alongside the E-Learning Readiness Scale and the Nomophobia Questionnaire augmented the STP-Q's validity, unveiling correlations that delineate the intricate interrelations among smart tool proneness, e-learning readiness, and nomophobia. Conclusively, the STP-Q distinguishes itself as a reliable and valid instrument for gauging tendencies towards smart tool use among the Turkish populace, providing profound insights into digital behavior across different cultural backgrounds. Its confirmed three-factor structure and robust psychometric attributes render it an indispensable resource for both individual assessments and expansive digital behavior investigations, enabling cross-cultural comparisons and enhancing our understanding of technology engagement dynamics.

摘要

本研究阐明了土耳其版智能工具倾向问卷(STP-Q)的跨文化适应性、信度和效度,旨在探究土耳其文化背景下个体与智能工具的互动情况。该问卷经过严格的适应性调整,旨在确保其在土耳其人群中的相关性和可理解性,随后在 387 名参与者中评估其心理测量特性。探索性因素分析揭示了一个三因素结构,反映了原始工具,涵盖了功利性使用、享乐性和社交性使用以及任务委托倾向。这种一致性突出了 STP-Q 在捕捉各种情境下智能工具交互的复杂维度方面的能力。问卷的内部一致性非常高,Cronbach's alpha 为 0.954,重测信度指数为 0.851。此外,与电子学习准备量表和手机依赖问卷同时进行的收敛有效性评估增加了 STP-Q 的有效性,揭示了智能工具倾向、电子学习准备和手机依赖之间复杂的相互关系。总之,STP-Q 是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于衡量土耳其人群中使用智能工具的倾向,为不同文化背景下的数字行为提供了深刻的见解。其经过验证的三因素结构和可靠的心理测量属性使其成为个体评估和广泛数字行为研究的不可或缺的资源,能够进行跨文化比较并增强我们对技术参与动态的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f60/11460675/097193332d18/pone.0309299.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f60/11460675/5e35f8d8bc0f/pone.0309299.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f60/11460675/097193332d18/pone.0309299.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f60/11460675/5e35f8d8bc0f/pone.0309299.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f60/11460675/097193332d18/pone.0309299.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Smart Tools Proneness Questionnaire (STP-Q).《Smart Tools 易感性问卷(STP-Q)土耳其语版的跨文化调适、信度和效度》。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 8;19(10):e0309299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309299. eCollection 2024.
2
Development of the Smart Tools Proneness Questionnaire (STP-Q): an instrument to assess the individual propensity to use smart tools.智能工具偏好问卷(STP-Q)的编制:评估个体使用智能工具倾向的工具。
Ergonomics. 2022 Dec;65(12):1639-1658. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2048895. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
The Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Turkish version, validity, and reliability study.青少年特发性关节炎患者的青少年关节炎生活质量问卷:土耳其语版本、效度和信度研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2024 Jun;43(6):1999-2008. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-06962-z. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其语版卫生专业人员沟通技巧量表。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of a Turkish Version of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ-Turkish).工作康复问卷(WORQ-土耳其语版)的土耳其语版本的跨文化调适、信度和效度。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Jun;31(2):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09917-8.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.日本矫形外科学会背痛评估问卷土耳其语版本的跨文化适应、信度和效度
J Orthop Sci. 2016 May;21(3):295-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
7
The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into Turkish assessing its psychometric properties.北欧肌肉骨骼问卷:跨文化适应为土耳其语并评估其心理测量学特性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Oct;38(21):2153-60. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1114034. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
The Turkish version of nursing practice readiness scale: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation.护理实践准备就绪量表的土耳其语版本:跨文化调适和心理计量评估。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Aug;30(4):e13254. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13254. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
9
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire.跨文化调适、信度和效度的土耳其感觉反应问卷。
Am J Occup Ther. 2024 Jan 1;78(1). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2024.050378.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF-PDI/T) for individuals with temporomandibular disorders.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其版颅面部疼痛和残疾量表 (CF-PDI/T) 为颞下颌关节紊乱的个体。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Feb;45(3):523-533. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2028909. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-4th Edition for people with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者视觉感知技能测试第四版的信度
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 4;20(3):e0318148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318148. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Secure and Smart Home Automation System with Speech Recognition and Power Measurement Capabilities.带语音识别和电量测量功能的安全智能家居自动化系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;23(13):5784. doi: 10.3390/s23135784.
2
Digital Gender Gap in the Second Half of Life Is Declining: Changes in Gendered Internet Use Between 2014 and 2021 in Germany.数字性别鸿沟在人生后半段正在缩小:2014 年至 2021 年间德国互联网使用的性别差异变化。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2023 Aug 2;78(8):1386-1395. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbad079.
3
Reporting Cultural Adaptation in Psychological Trials - The RECAPT criteria.
心理试验中报告文化适应情况 - RECAPT标准。
Clin Psychol Eur. 2021 Nov 23;3(Spec Issue):e6351. doi: 10.32872/cpe.6351. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
Modeling the adoption of medical wearable devices among the senior adults: Using hybrid SEM-neural network approach.建模老年人对医疗可穿戴设备的采用:使用混合 SEM-神经网络方法。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;10:1016065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1016065. eCollection 2022.
5
Development of the Smart Tools Proneness Questionnaire (STP-Q): an instrument to assess the individual propensity to use smart tools.智能工具偏好问卷(STP-Q)的编制:评估个体使用智能工具倾向的工具。
Ergonomics. 2022 Dec;65(12):1639-1658. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2048895. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care.精准医学、人工智能与个性化医疗的未来
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan;14(1):86-93. doi: 10.1111/cts.12884. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Brain health consequences of digital technology use
.数字技术使用对大脑健康的影响。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jun;22(2):179-187. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/gsmall.
8
The impact of the digital revolution 
on human brain and behavior: where 
do we stand?
.数字革命对人类大脑和行为的影响:我们处于什么位置?
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jun;22(2):101-111. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mkorte.
9
Going digital: how technology use may influence human brains and behavior
.走向数字化:技术使用如何影响人类大脑和行为
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jun;22(2):93-97. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/mhoehe.
10
Harmony in Life Scale - Turkish version: Studies of validity and reliability.生活和谐量表 - 土耳其语版本:效度与信度研究
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2017 Sep 4;30(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s41155-017-0073-9.