• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建初中生体育素养评价指标体系:一项中国研究。

The construction of a physical literacy assessment index system for junior high school students: a Chinese study.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, University of Jinan, Jinan, 250022, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 13;14(1):23938. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74698-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-74698-6
PMID:39397095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11471848/
Abstract

In recent years, the internalisation of education in China has led to an increase in the prevalence of a highly competitive, test-focused approach to learning. This has had a detrimental impact on the physical health and wellbeing of children and adolescents in China, resulting in a concerning lack of physical literacy among junior high school students. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to construct an evaluation index system for physical literacy in junior high school students with Chinese characteristics, quantify the relative importance of each domain, and provide a framework for students to assess and self-evaluate the sustainable development of their physical literacy. The indicator system was modelled on CAPL-2, and valid indicators were extracted from the literature. A pre-selected indicator system for physical literacy in junior high school students was constructed through three rounds of Delphi expert questionnaire surveys (48 questionnaires were distributed in total). A total of 16 experts participated in all three rounds of the surveys until a consensus was reached on the indicators, resulting in the establishment of a hierarchical analysis-based theoretical model. This was developed using the experts' opinions and determined the items to be subdomains and weights. The AHP was employed to ascertain the relative importance of the subdomains and items within the assessment system. The index weight scores of the Chinese junior high school students' physical literacy assessment index system are aligned with the core tenet of the physical literacy concept, comprising four primary indicators, eight secondary indicators, and 26 tertiary indicators. The weights of the physical literacy evaluation indexes for junior high school students in China were calculated using the AHP to establish a progressive hierarchical model and the consistency test. The primary indicators were found to be in the following order of importance: Physical Competence (29.82%) > Motivation and Confidence (29.64%) > Knowledge and Understanding (20.27%) = Daily Behavior (20.27%). The system is an effective means of evaluating the impact of physical activity and health promotion among junior high school students, and it effectively addresses the needs of this age group in these areas. It provides a comprehensive assessment of the effects of physical activity and health promotion among junior high school students, and it offers a scientific foundation for the development of precise and individualized physical activity and health promotion programs.

摘要

近年来,中国教育的国际化导致了一种高度竞争、以考试为重点的学习方式的流行。这对中国儿童和青少年的身心健康产生了不利影响,导致初中生的身体素养明显缺乏。因此,本研究的目的是构建一个具有中国特色的初中生身体素养评价指标体系,量化各领域的相对重要性,并为学生提供一个评估和自我评估身体素养可持续发展的框架。该指标体系以 CAPL-2 为模型,从文献中提取有效指标。通过三轮德尔菲专家问卷调查(共发放 48 份问卷)构建了一个初中生身体素养预筛选指标体系。共有 16 位专家参加了三轮调查,直到专家们就指标达成共识,从而建立了一个基于层次分析的理论模型。该模型是利用专家的意见建立的,确定了项目的子领域和权重。层次分析法(AHP)用于确定评估系统中子领域和项目的相对重要性。中国初中生身体素养评估指标体系的指标权重得分符合身体素养概念的核心原则,包括四个主要指标、八个次要指标和 26 个三级指标。利用层次分析法(AHP)计算中国初中生身体素养评价指标的权重,建立递进层次模型,并进行一致性检验。研究发现,主要指标的重要性排序如下:身体能力(29.82%)>动机和信心(29.64%)>知识和理解(20.27%)=日常行为(20.27%)。该系统是评估初中生体育活动和健康促进影响的有效手段,有效满足了这一年龄段在这些领域的需求。它全面评估了体育活动和健康促进对初中生的影响,为制定精确和个性化的体育活动和健康促进计划提供了科学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a4/11471848/a5e74a8a087b/41598_2024_74698_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a4/11471848/a5e74a8a087b/41598_2024_74698_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73a4/11471848/a5e74a8a087b/41598_2024_74698_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The construction of a physical literacy assessment index system for junior high school students: a Chinese study.构建初中生体育素养评价指标体系:一项中国研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 13;14(1):23938. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74698-6.
2
Associations between perceived and actual physical literacy level in Chinese primary school children.中国小学生感知和实际身体素养水平之间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8318-4.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version physical literacy assessment questionnaire among high school students in Gansu, China.中文版身体素养评估问卷在中国甘肃高中生中的心理测量学特性
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 9;13:e19093. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19093. eCollection 2025.
4
Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess the implementation of physical education programs in Chinese junior high schools.发展和验证评估中国初中体育课程实施情况的问卷。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):2387. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19844-5.
5
The Development of Chinese Assessment and Evaluation of Physical Literacy (CAEPL): A Study Using Delphi Method.中文体质健康素养评估与评价工具(CAEPL)的研制:德尔菲法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082720.
6
Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy Second Edition: a streamlined assessment of the capacity for physical activity among children 8 to 12 years of age.加拿大体育素养评估第二版:一种简化的 8 至 12 岁儿童身体活动能力评估方法。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;18(Suppl 2):1047. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5902-y.
7
Measuring functional, interactive and critical health literacy of Chinese secondary school students: reliable, valid and feasible?测量中国中学生的功能性、互动性和批判性健康素养:可靠、有效且可行吗?
Glob Health Promot. 2018 Dec;25(4):6-14. doi: 10.1177/1757975918764109. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
8
Developing an evaluation indicators of health literacy for cervical cancer among Chinese women: a modified Delphi method study.中文译文:制定中国女性宫颈癌健康素养评估指标:一项改良 Delphi 法研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 12;23(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11208-3.
9
Refining the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy based on theory and factor analyses.基于理论和因子分析对加拿大身体素养评估进行优化。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;18(Suppl 2):1044. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5899-2.
10
The association between quality of life(QOL) and health literacy among junior middle school students: a cross-sectional study.初中生生活质量(QOL)与健康素养的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):1183. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6082-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The revised version of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short for Chinese middle school students.中国中学生身体自我描述问卷简版修订版。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 5;16:1513882. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1513882. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the Competency Evaluation Scale for Clinical Nutritionists in China: A Delphi Study.中国临床营养师胜任力评价量表的研制:德尔菲法研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 6;16(16):2593. doi: 10.3390/nu16162593.
2
Constructing an evaluation index system for clinical nursing practice teaching quality using a Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process-based approach.采用德尔菲法和层次分析法构建临床护理实践教学质量评价指标体系。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05770-y.
3
Development and validation of nurse's assessment ability questionnaire in delirium subtypes: Based on Delphi expert consensus.
基于德尔菲专家共识的谵妄亚型护士评估能力问卷的编制与验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 23;19(1):e0297063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297063. eCollection 2024.
4
Principles of Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy for Iliac VEnous Stenting (POATIVES): A national expert-based Delphi consensus study.髂静脉支架置入术的最佳抗栓治疗原则(POATIVES):基于全国专家的德尔菲共识研究。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101739. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101739. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
Developing a third-degree burn model of rats using the Delphi method.采用德尔菲法建立大鼠三度烧伤模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 2;12(1):13852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18092-0.
6
Development of the competency assessment scale for clinical nursing teachers: Results of a Delphi study and validation.临床护理教师能力评估量表的开发:德尔菲研究和验证结果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jun;101:104876. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104876. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
Depression, anxiety and associated factors among Chinese adolescents during the COVID-19 outbreak: a comparison of two cross-sectional studies.新冠肺炎疫情期间中国青少年的抑郁、焦虑及相关因素:两项横断面研究的比较
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 2;11(1):148. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01271-4.
8
The Development of Chinese Assessment and Evaluation of Physical Literacy (CAEPL): A Study Using Delphi Method.中文体质健康素养评估与评价工具(CAEPL)的研制:德尔菲法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082720.
9
Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy in grades 7-9 (12-16 years): Preliminary validity and descriptive results.加拿大 7-9 年级(12-16 岁)身体素养评估:初步有效性和描述性结果。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Jan;38(2):177-186. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1689076. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
10
Trends in physical fitness, growth, and nutritional status of Chinese children and adolescents: a retrospective analysis of 1·5 million students from six successive national surveys between 1985 and 2014.中国儿童青少年身体素质、生长发育和营养状况的变化趋势:1985 年至 2014 年六次连续国家调查 150 万名学生的回顾性分析。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Dec;3(12):871-880. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30302-5. Epub 2019 Sep 30.