Miraldi Elisabetta, Cappellucci Giorgio, Baini Giulia, Pistone Elia Silvia, Allodi Marika, Costantino Gabriele, Spaggiari Chiara, Biagi Marco
Department of Physical Sciences, Earth and Environment, University of Siena, Via Laterina, 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.
SIFITLab, Italian Society of Phytotherapy, Via Laterina, 8, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 29;13(19):2734. doi: 10.3390/plants13192734.
Knowledge of the chemical composition of propolis is crucial for understanding the characteristics of products of different origins, but also for quality control and regulatory purposes. To date, official monographs or official analyses that allow researchers to evaluate propolis in a proper way have not yet been released. This study focuses on the characterization of twenty-seven Italian propolis samples and the identification of chemical markers that define its geographical provenance. Total polyphenol (TP) and total flavonoid (TF) content, alongside the quantification of pinocembrin, chrysin, galangin, and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), were identified as potential markers. Additionally, DPPH assays were conducted to evaluate the antiradical activity of propolis samples. Our findings demonstrated that TPs, TFs and pinocembrin differed in propolis of different origins, especially in samples from the islands. However, the quantification of the sum of chrysin and galangin and CAPE provided a clearer distinction of the geographical origin of the propolis samples. In contrast, the DPPH assay did not prove useful for this purpose, as most results were similar and, therefore, not significant. This study lays the groundwork for future research on propolis. These findings could contribute to the development of more refined methods for distinguishing propolis origins, enhancing the understanding, valuation and quality control of this natural product in various applications.
了解蜂胶的化学成分对于理解不同产地产品的特性至关重要,同时对于质量控制和监管目的也很关键。迄今为止,尚未发布能让研究人员以适当方式评估蜂胶的官方专著或官方分析报告。本研究聚焦于27个意大利蜂胶样品的特性描述以及确定能界定其地理来源的化学标志物。总多酚(TP)和总黄酮(TF)含量,以及松属素、白杨素、高良姜素和咖啡酸苯乙酯(CAPE)的定量分析,被确定为潜在标志物。此外,还进行了DPPH测定以评估蜂胶样品的抗自由基活性。我们的研究结果表明,不同产地的蜂胶中TP、TF和松属素存在差异,尤其是来自岛屿的样品。然而,白杨素和高良姜素之和以及CAPE的定量分析能更清晰地区分蜂胶样品的地理来源。相比之下,DPPH测定在此目的上并无用处,因为大多数结果相似,因此不具有显著性。本研究为未来蜂胶研究奠定了基础。这些发现有助于开发更精确的方法来区分蜂胶来源,增进对这种天然产品在各种应用中的理解、评估和质量控制。