Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Ridebanevej 9, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Centre for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Acta Vet Scand. 2024 Oct 24;66(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13028-024-00779-1.
Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians pose unique challenges due to their aggressive nature, poikilothermic physiology, and specific anatomical and physiological characteristics, all factors that complicate crocodilian anaesthesia. This review aimed to systematically review the literature regarding sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians with focus on efficacy and impact on vital parameters. A systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on May 2, 2023 in the databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Publications were excluded based on predefined exclusion criteria, which encompassed non-standard publications and publications unrelated to crocodilians, with fewer than five animals and/or with insufficient data on sedation and general anaesthesia. Five key factors were used to evaluate the strength of evidence: number of included animals, study design, definition of recovery time, blinded assessment of recovery and conflict of interest. Ten publications were included in this systematic review. Drugs used included alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonists, dissociative anaesthetics, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blocking agents, propofol, alfaxalone, and inhalant gasses. The studies included in total 55 Alligator mississippiensis, 110 Crocodylus porosus, 15 Crocodylus johnstoni, and 15 Crocodylus niloticus. Factors such as temperature, administration route, dose, species, and age influenced protocols for sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians. The studies included used five different study designs. Only one study included a control group, done on retrospectively collected data. Blinded recovery assessments and declarations of no conflict of interest were noted in some studies. The use of four distinct recovery definitions posed challenges to comparability in this systematic review. The studies reported that medetomidine provided stable and reversible sedation, although it depressed heart rate. Alfaxalone was less stable outside the optimal temperature range. Intubation and inhalation anaesthesia were effective, and adrenaline reduced the length of the recovery period. Overall, the review provides valuable insights for veterinarians, researchers, and wildlife professionals involved in sedation and general anaesthesia of the crocodilian species, however, the literature is limited, and further research is needed to improve evidence-based medical management.
由于鳄鱼具有攻击性、变温生理特性以及特定的解剖和生理特征,因此对其进行镇静和全身麻醉具有独特的挑战,所有这些因素都使鳄鱼的麻醉复杂化。本综述旨在系统地回顾有关鳄鱼镇静和全身麻醉的文献,重点是疗效和对生命参数的影响。根据 PRISMA 指南,于 2023 年 5 月 2 日在 Embase、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。根据预先设定的排除标准排除了出版物,这些标准包括非标准出版物和与鳄鱼无关的出版物,以及涉及少于 5 只动物和/或镇静和全身麻醉数据不足的出版物。使用了 5 个关键因素来评估证据的强度:纳入动物的数量、研究设计、恢复时间的定义、恢复的盲法评估和利益冲突。本系统评价共纳入 10 篇文献。使用的药物包括α-2-肾上腺素能受体激动剂、分离麻醉剂、苯二氮䓬类、神经肌肉阻滞剂、异丙酚、阿法沙龙和吸入性气体。这些研究共纳入了 55 条密西西比鳄、110 条湾鳄、15 条约翰斯顿鳄和 15 条尼罗鳄。温度、给药途径、剂量、物种和年龄等因素影响了鳄鱼镇静和全身麻醉的方案。这些研究使用了五种不同的研究设计。只有一项研究包括一个对照组,是基于回顾性收集的数据进行的。一些研究中注意到了盲法恢复评估和无利益冲突的声明。在本系统评价中,使用了四个不同的恢复定义,这给比较带来了挑战。这些研究报告称,美托咪定可提供稳定且可逆转的镇静作用,尽管它会降低心率。阿法沙龙在最佳温度范围外不太稳定。插管和吸入麻醉效果良好,肾上腺素可缩短恢复期。总的来说,该综述为从事鳄鱼镇静和全身麻醉的兽医、研究人员和野生动物专业人员提供了有价值的见解,但是,文献有限,需要进一步研究来改进基于证据的医疗管理。