Boillat Thomas, Prithishkumar Ivan James, Suresh Dineshwary, Naidoo Nerissa
Design Lab, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Basic Sciences, College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Anat Cell Biol. 2025 Mar 31;58(1):112-121. doi: 10.5115/acb.24.197. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a global paradigm shift in the teaching of human anatomy. Most institutions successfully transitioned from traditional in-person teaching methods, to various distance-learning strategies. Since virtual reality (VR) offers immersive three-dimensional (3D) experiences, this study investigated students' experiences regarding the capacity of VR to support distance-learning of anatomy. Using the VR application, 3D Organon Virtual Reality Anatomy, anatomy instructors pre-recorded learning content as 360-degree videos with live voice-over and integrated it into the teaching material of the MBBS first-year abdomen, pelvis, and perineum-structure and function course. A 19-item 5-point Likert scale questionnaire, comprising of two major categories, "VR experience in anatomy lessons" and "VR in anatomy lessons vs. traditional cadaveric dissection" was disseminated. Post-evaluation analysis revealed a response rate of 63.5%. Almost 70% of students agreed that VR was instrumental in solidifying their theoretical understanding and improved spatial awareness with better retention of anatomical relationships. Approximately 50% wanted to continue using VR even if instruction becomes onsite. Though 72% of participants agree that VR addressed the session learning objectives only 24% agree that it is similar or better than cadaveric dissection, thus preferring cadaveric dissection to VR. Only 12.1% agree that VR is more beneficial to cadaveric dissection. Our exploration into the integration of VR technology in anatomy teaching has revealed promising opportunities. While VR can augment traditional teaching methods in unprecedented times such as war, floods or global pandemic, it should not replace hands-on cadaveric learning entirely, but rather complement existing approaches.
新冠疫情促使人体解剖学教学发生了全球性的范式转变。大多数院校成功地从传统的面授教学方法过渡到了各种远程学习策略。由于虚拟现实(VR)提供沉浸式三维(3D)体验,本研究调查了学生对于VR支持解剖学远程学习能力的体验。解剖学教师使用VR应用程序“3D Organon虚拟现实解剖学”,将学习内容预先录制为带有现场画外音的360度视频,并将其整合到医学学士一年级腹部、骨盆和会阴结构与功能课程的教材中。我们发放了一份由19个项目组成的5点李克特量表问卷,该问卷包括“解剖学课程中的VR体验”和“解剖学课程中的VR与传统尸体解剖”两个主要类别。评估后分析显示回复率为63.5%。近70%的学生认为VR有助于巩固他们的理论理解,并通过更好地保留解剖关系提高空间意识。约50%的学生表示即使恢复现场教学也希望继续使用VR。虽然72%的参与者认为VR实现了课程学习目标,但只有24%的人认为它与尸体解剖相似或更好,因此比起VR他们更喜欢尸体解剖。只有12.1%的人认为VR比尸体解剖更有益。我们对VR技术在解剖学教学中的整合探索揭示了一些有前景的机会。虽然在战争、洪水或全球大流行等前所未有的时期,VR可以增强传统教学方法,但它不应完全取代亲身实践的尸体解剖学习,而应补充现有方法。