Minouei Marzieh Alsadat, Omid Athar, Mirzaie Alireza, Mahdavifard Hamid, Rahimi Alireza
Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):1407. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06402-1.
Virtual reality (VR) technology presents a promising alternative to medical education by creating an immersive and interactive learning environment. This research aimed to examine the effectiveness of virtual reality on medical students' academic achievement in anatomy.
This systematic review included 24 full-text articles in both Persian and English from 10 databases. The search focused on experimental, quasi-experimental, and descriptive studies published between May 28, 2000, and May 24, 2022. At least two researchers reviewed all studies. In cases of disagreement between the two, a third researcher reviewed the article and made the final decision. Results were analyzed according to the four-level Kirkpatrick model. Also, the modified Buckley checklist was used to assess the quality of the study.
Twenty-four articles were included. Following Kirkpatrick's levels of evaluation, Nineteen studies explored the first level of training effectiveness (reaction). Twenty-four studies examined the second level (learning). One study investigated the efficacy of education (behavior). No studies have investigated the fourth level (impact).
This study argues that Virtual reality improves students' academic progress and learning in medical anatomy when used as a supplementary way to other methods. However, experimental studies are recommended to investigate the impact of various factors on the efficacy of this method.
虚拟现实(VR)技术通过创建沉浸式和交互式学习环境,为医学教育提供了一种有前景的替代方案。本研究旨在探讨虚拟现实对医学生解剖学学业成绩的有效性。
本系统评价纳入了来自10个数据库的24篇波斯语和英语全文文章。检索重点为2000年5月28日至2022年5月24日发表的实验性、准实验性和描述性研究。至少两名研究人员对所有研究进行了审查。若两人之间存在分歧,则由第三名研究人员审查文章并做出最终决定。结果根据四级柯克帕特里克模型进行分析。此外,还使用了修改后的巴克利清单来评估研究质量。
纳入了24篇文章。按照柯克帕特里克的评估水平,19项研究探讨了培训效果的第一级(反应)。24项研究考察了第二级(学习)。1项研究调查了教育效果(行为)。没有研究调查第四级(影响)。
本研究认为,当虚拟现实作为其他方法的补充方式使用时,可提高医学生在解剖学方面的学业进展和学习效果。然而,建议开展实验研究以调查各种因素对该方法效果的影响。