• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过患者参与共同创建一项定性生育力研究,以了解等待时间经历。

Co-creation of a qualitative fertility research study to understand waiting time experiences through patient engagement.

作者信息

Healey Madison, Craig Julia, Thomas Sarah, Tizzard Jillian, Puddister Kelsey, McGowan Erin L, Twells Laurie K, Wadden Katie P

机构信息

School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Physical Education Building, 230 Elizabeth Avenue, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada.

Patient Partner, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00665-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00665-0
PMID:39695894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11654303/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Infertility affects an estimated 8 to 12% of the global population and approximately one in six heterosexual couples in Canada. To access fertility services in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, individuals with an infertility diagnosis wait for extended periods, and this waiting period has been associated with psychological distress. However, this experience of waiting has not been well studied, and several gaps in fertility research exist. The inclusion of persons with lived experience of infertility in the creation of studies related to infertility may improve research outcomes and create patient empowerment.

AIM

To collaboratively develop a qualitative research project focused on understanding the waiting experiences of patients seeking fertility services in Newfoundland and Labrador, utilizing patient engagement initiatives and involving individuals with infertility experiences.

METHODS

Three patient partners who represented individuals awaiting fertility services were recruited to be research team members. Patient partners were eligible to participate as research team members if they identified as either female or non-binary (to effectively represent the female and non-binary target population in the co-produced qualitative study) and had lived experience waiting for fertility services in the province. The research team developed a detailed patient engagement plan following the International Association for Public Participation framework (IAP2). Data from research team discussion groups were documented using a meeting minutes template. Two questionnaires from the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool were employed to assess patient partners' impact and satisfaction with the research process.

RESULTS

Patient partner involvement and input helped the co-creation process by refocusing the qualitative study's research aim to empower patients. To accomplish the new research aim, the patient partners refined the study's methodology through adjustments to the research design, protocol, interview guide, and participant criteria of the upcoming qualitative study. The PPEET analysis demonstrated high satisfaction with engagement and a high perceived value of patient contributions in the co-creation of the research study. In turn, the PPEET results indicated that patient partners had a comprehensive understanding of their roles for engagement and were satisfied with their involvement in the various research activities.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, using patient engagement to co-create a qualitative fertility study to understand patients' experiences while waiting for fertility services resulted in significant changes to the proposed methodology and research priorities and helped address knowledge gaps in existing fertility research. Most importantly, the patient engagement approach helped foster an inclusive and empowering environment for patient partners to contribute to fertility research.

摘要

背景

据估计,不孕症影响着全球8%至12%的人口,在加拿大,约六分之一的异性恋夫妇受此影响。在加拿大纽芬兰与拉布拉多省,被诊断为不孕症的患者需要等待很长时间才能获得生育服务,而这种等待期与心理困扰有关。然而,这种等待经历尚未得到充分研究,生育研究中存在一些空白。让有不孕症实际经历的人参与不孕症相关研究的创建,可能会改善研究结果并增强患者的权能。

目的

通过患者参与计划并让有不孕症经历的人参与,共同开展一项定性研究项目,重点了解在纽芬兰与拉布拉多省寻求生育服务的患者的等待经历。

方法

招募了三名代表等待生育服务的患者作为研究团队成员。如果患者自认为是女性或非二元性别(以便在共同开展的定性研究中有效代表女性和非二元性别目标人群)且有在该省等待生育服务的实际经历,就有资格作为研究团队成员参与。研究团队遵循国际公众参与协会框架(IAP2)制定了详细的患者参与计划。研究团队讨论小组的数据使用会议记录模板进行记录。使用公众与患者参与评估工具中的两份问卷来评估患者对研究过程的影响和满意度。

结果

患者的参与和投入通过将定性研究的目标重新聚焦于增强患者权能,有助于共同创造过程。为实现新的研究目标,患者对即将开展的定性研究的研究设计、方案、访谈指南和参与者标准进行了调整,从而完善了研究方法。公众与患者参与评估工具分析表明,对参与高度满意,且在共同开展研究中患者贡献的感知价值很高。反过来,公众与患者参与评估工具的结果表明,患者对自己的参与角色有全面的理解,并对参与各项研究活动感到满意。

结论

总之,利用患者参与共同创建一项定性生育研究,以了解患者等待生育服务时的经历,导致所提议的方法和研究重点发生了重大变化,并有助于填补现有生育研究中的知识空白。最重要的是,患者参与方法有助于营造一个包容且能增强权能的环境,让患者为生育研究做出贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/5694f2ff7865/40900_2024_665_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/dc1eaa40f8f5/40900_2024_665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/1b8aaffa9374/40900_2024_665_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/4474af09e0fb/40900_2024_665_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/5694f2ff7865/40900_2024_665_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/dc1eaa40f8f5/40900_2024_665_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/1b8aaffa9374/40900_2024_665_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/4474af09e0fb/40900_2024_665_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35f8/11654303/5694f2ff7865/40900_2024_665_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Co-creation of a qualitative fertility research study to understand waiting time experiences through patient engagement.通过患者参与共同创建一项定性生育力研究,以了解等待时间经历。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 18;10(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00665-0.
2
Co-learning commentary: a patient partner perspective in mental health care research.共同学习评论:心理健康护理研究中患者伙伴的视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 18;9(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00435-4.
3
Evaluating the impact of engaging older adults and service providers as research partners in the co-design of a community mobility-promoting program: a mixed methods developmental evaluation study.评估让老年人和服务提供者作为研究伙伴共同设计社区促进行动能力项目的影响:一项混合方法的发展性评估研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 8;9(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00523-5.
4
Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities.青少年参与研究:探索神经发育障碍青少年的培训需求。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 10;9(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.
5
Working together in health research: a mixed-methods patient engagement evaluation.健康研究中的合作:一项混合方法的患者参与度评估
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 1;9(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00475-w.
6
Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research.运用定性健康研究方法,改善患者及公众对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 13;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0129-8. eCollection 2018.
7
Am I attached? A patient-partnered approach to creating infographics about attachment to primary care in Ontario, Canada.我是否有归属感?一种由患者参与的方法,用于制作关于加拿大安大略省对初级医疗保健归属感的信息图表。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Nov 4;10(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00652-5.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study.探索患者及护理者对患者伴侣角色意义的认知:一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Nov 28;9(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00511-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Web-Based Digital Storytelling for Endometriosis and Pain: Qualitative Pilot Study.基于网络的子宫内膜异位症与疼痛数字叙事:定性试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 14;7:e37549. doi: 10.2196/37549.
2
The impact of stigma on mental health and quality of life of infertile women: A systematic review.污名对不孕女性心理健康和生活质量的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1093459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1093459. eCollection 2022.
3
'You're on the waiting list': An interpretive phenomenological analysis of young adults' experiences of waiting lists within mental health services in the UK.
“你在候补名单上”:英国精神卫生服务中年轻人等待名单体验的阐释现象学分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 18;17(3):e0265542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265542. eCollection 2022.
4
Sex Inequalities in Medical Research: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Literature.医学研究中的性别不平等:文献的系统综述
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Jan 31;3(1):49-59. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0083. eCollection 2022.
5
Consumer engagement in health care policy, research and services: A systematic review and meta-analysis of methods and effects.消费者参与医疗政策、研究和服务:方法和效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0261808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261808. eCollection 2022.
6
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lifestyle management in polycystic ovary syndrome: Endocrinologists' and obstetricians and gynaecologists' perspectives.多囊卵巢综合征生活方式管理实施的障碍与促进因素:内分泌学家以及妇产科医生的观点
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jul;105(7):2292-2298. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.12.013. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
7
Operationalizing a patient engagement plan for health research: Sharing a codesigned planning template from a national clinical trial.将患者参与健康研究计划付诸实践:分享全国临床试验的共同设计规划模板。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):697-711. doi: 10.1111/hex.13417. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
8
The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient-centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait-listed patients and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.等待手术的心理负担以及在新冠疫情期间可支持等待手术患者和护理人员心理健康的以患者为中心的策略:一项范围综述
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):978-990. doi: 10.1111/hex.13241. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
Patient engagement in an online coaching intervention for parents of children with suspected developmental delays.患者参与针对疑似发育迟缓儿童家长的在线辅导干预。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 Jun;63(6):668-674. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14810. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
10
The impact of patient involvement in research: a case study of the planning, conduct and dissemination of a clinical, controlled trial.患者参与研究的影响:一项关于临床对照试验的规划、实施与传播的案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 19;6:43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00214-5. eCollection 2020.