• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying strategies to promote team science in dissemination and implementation research.确定在传播与实施研究中促进团队科学的策略。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Sep 9;4(3):180-187. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.413.
2
Developing a national dissemination plan for collaborative care for depression: QUERI Series.制定抑郁症协同护理的全国推广计划:QUERI 系列。
Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 31;3:59. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-59.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Measuring hot flashes: summary of a National Institutes of Health workshop.潮热的测量:美国国立卫生研究院研讨会综述
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Jun;79(6):777-81. doi: 10.4065/79.6.777.
5
The relevance of team characteristics and team directed strategies in the implementation of nursing innovations: a literature review.团队特征和团队导向策略在护理创新实施中的相关性:一项文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Sep;46(9):1256-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
6
A Four-Phase Model of Transdisciplinary Team-Based Research: Goals, Team Processes, and Strategies.基于跨学科团队研究的四阶段模型:目标、团队流程与策略
Transl Behav Med. 2012 Dec 1;2(4):415-430. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0167-y.
7
The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.团队科学的科学:对科学合作的实证证据和研究差距的综述。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):532-548. doi: 10.1037/amp0000319.
8
Is the juice worth the squeeze? Transdisciplinary team science in bladder health.值得挤一挤吗?膀胱健康的跨学科团队科学。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jun;39(5):1601-1611. doi: 10.1002/nau.24357. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
9
Roles dissemination and implementation scientists can play in supporting research teams.传播与实施科学家在支持研究团队方面可发挥的作用。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jan 15;2(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00107-4.
10
Team Science Approach to Developing Consensus on Research Good Practices for Practice-Based Research Networks: A Case Study.基于团队科学方法就实践型研究网络的研究良好实践达成共识:一项案例研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):632-7. doi: 10.1111/cts.12363. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Building capacity and equity in implementation science: evaluation of a national mentored training program.建设实施科学的能力与公平性:一项全国性指导培训项目的评估
Implement Sci. 2025 Aug 1;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01446-3.
2
Toward equity in cultivating a ":" An exploration of networking experiences in an implementation research training program.迈向培养“:”的公平性:对一项实施研究培训项目中的社交网络体验的探索
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Feb 11;9(1):e50. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.17. eCollection 2025.
3
Recommendations for interdisciplinary research collaboration for early career dissemination and implementation researchers: A multi-phase study.针对早期职业阶段的传播与实施研究人员的跨学科研究合作建议:一项多阶段研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 17;9(1):e39. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.684. eCollection 2025.
4
Building trusting relationships in teams to support evidence use and implementation in human services: feasibility and acceptability of a training and coaching approach.在团队中建立信任关系以支持人类服务中证据的使用与实施:一种培训与指导方法的可行性与可接受性
Front Health Serv. 2024 Dec 10;4:1353741. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1353741. eCollection 2024.
5
A mixed-methods analysis to understand the implementation of a multistakeholder research consortium: Environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO).一项旨在了解多利益相关方研究联盟实施情况的混合方法分析:环境对儿童健康结果的影响(ECHO)
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug 29;7(1):e198. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.620. eCollection 2023.
6
Budget impact analysis for implementation decision making, planning, and financing.预算影响分析在实施决策、规划和融资中的应用。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):54-59. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad059.
7
Barriers and facilitators of conducting research with team science approach: a systematic review.采用团队科学方法进行研究的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04619-0.
8
Application of team science best practices to the project management of a large, multi-site lung cancer screening research consortium.将团队科学最佳实践应用于大型多中心肺癌筛查研究联盟的项目管理。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jun 5;7(1):e145. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.566. eCollection 2023.
9
Behavioral Parent Training for Families With Young Deaf or Hard of Hearing Children Followed in Hearing Health Care.在听力保健中对有听障或重听幼儿的家庭进行行为家长培训。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Oct 17;65(10):3646-3660. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00055. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
10
Training and Career Development in Cardio-Oncology Translational and Implementation Science.在心脏肿瘤转化和实施科学领域的培训和职业发展。
Heart Fail Clin. 2022 Jul;18(3):503-514. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2022.02.014.

本文引用的文献

1
From community engagement, to community-engaged research, to broadly engaged team science.从社区参与,到社区参与式研究,再到广泛参与的团队科学。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr 12;1(1):5-6. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.1. eCollection 2017 Feb.
2
The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?共同生产的阴暗面:对于健康研究来说,其成本是否超过了收益?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
3
Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.系统评价探索、准备、实施、维持(EPIS)框架。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 5;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6.
4
The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead.团队合作科学:进展、反思与未来之路。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):593-600. doi: 10.1037/amp0000334.
5
Interdisciplinary team science and the public: Steps toward a participatory team science.跨学科团队科学与公众:迈向参与式团队科学的步骤。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):549-562. doi: 10.1037/amp0000281.
6
The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science.团队科学的科学:对科学合作的实证证据和研究差距的综述。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):532-548. doi: 10.1037/amp0000319.
7
Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.医疗保健中的团队合作:实现更安全、高质量护理的关键发现。
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):433-450. doi: 10.1037/amp0000298.
8
The AGING Initiative experience: a call for sustained support for team science networks.AGING Initiative 经验:呼吁为团队科学网络提供持续支持。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 18;16(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0324-y.
9
Organizational and training factors that promote team science: A qualitative analysis and application of theory to the National Institutes of Health's BIRCWH career development program.促进团队科学的组织与培训因素:对美国国立卫生研究院BIRCWH职业发展项目的定性分析及理论应用
J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr;1(2):101-107. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.17. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
10
Testing the leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI) intervention in substance abuse treatment: a cluster randomized trial study protocol.在药物滥用治疗中测试领导力与组织变革实施干预(LOCI):一项整群随机试验研究方案
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 3;12(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0562-3.

确定在传播与实施研究中促进团队科学的策略。

Identifying strategies to promote team science in dissemination and implementation research.

作者信息

Aarons Gregory A, Reeder Kendal, Miller Christopher J, Stadnick Nicole A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093-0812, USA.

Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, CA 92123, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Sep 9;4(3):180-187. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.413.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2019.413
PMID:32695486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7348006/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Scientific endeavors are increasingly carried out by teams of scientists. While there is growing literature on factors associated with effective science teams, little is known about processes that facilitate the success of dissemination and implementation (D&I) teams studying the uptake of healthcare innovations. This study aimed to identify strategies used by D&I scientists to promote team science.

METHODS

Using a nominal group technique, a sample of 27 D&I scholars responded to the question, "What strategies have you or others used to promote team science?" Participants were asked to individually respond and then discuss within a small group to determine the group's top three strategies. Through a facilitated consensus discussion with the full sample, a rank-ordered list of three strategies was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 126 individual responses ( = 9; SD = 4.88) were submitted. Through small group discussion, six groups ranked their top three strategies to promote team science. The final ranked list of strategies determined by the full sample included: (1) developing and maintaining clear expectations, (2) promoting and modeling effective communication, and (3) establishing shared goals and a mission of the work to be accomplished.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of its goal of translating knowledge to practice, D&I research necessitates the use of team science. The top strategies are in line with those found to be effective for teams in other fields and hold promise for improving D&I team cohesion and innovation, which may ultimately accelerate the translation of health innovations and the improvement of care quality and outcomes.

摘要

引言

科学研究越来越多地由科学家团队开展。虽然关于有效科学团队相关因素的文献越来越多,但对于促进研究医疗保健创新采用情况的传播与实施(D&I)团队取得成功的过程却知之甚少。本研究旨在确定D&I科学家用于促进团队科学的策略。

方法

采用名义群体技术,27名D&I学者样本回答了“你或其他人使用了哪些策略来促进团队科学?”这一问题。参与者被要求先单独回答,然后在小组内讨论以确定小组的前三大策略。通过与整个样本进行的促进性共识讨论,确定了一个按顺序排列的三大策略清单。

结果

共提交了126份个人回答(平均值 = 9;标准差 = 4.88)。通过小组讨论,六个小组对促进团队科学的前三大策略进行了排名。整个样本最终确定的策略排名清单包括:(1)制定并维持明确的期望,(2)促进并示范有效的沟通,以及(3)确立共同目标和要完成的工作使命。

结论

由于其将知识转化为实践的目标,D&I研究需要采用团队科学。这些首要策略与在其他领域对团队有效的策略一致,有望改善D&I团队的凝聚力和创新能力,这最终可能加速健康创新的转化以及护理质量和结果的改善。