• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

4月15日战争与苏丹的血液透析患者:一项横断面研究。

April 15th war and hemodialysis patients in Sudan: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Idrees Malaz Hassan Dafaalla, Bashir Moez Mohammed Ibrahim, Mohamed Balqees Abdeen Ahmed, Ahmed Amal Essam Ali, Abdalla Hamid Mohieldin Mohamed, Shaaban Kamil Mirghani Ali

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21369-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-21369-4
PMID:39833802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11744938/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

On April 15th, 2023, intense clashes involving heavy weapons and airstrikes occurred between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Khartoum, the capital of Sudan, leading to the displacement of almost 8.1 million people. The ongoing armed conflict in Sudan has led to a worsening humanitarian catastrophe, posing serious challenges to the country's health-care system and even its collapse. Healthcare facilities have been severely affected, with barely one-third of hospitals operating in conflict zones. Hemodialysis patients are among the most affected by this war's aftermath, which ranges from obvious dangers like violence-related injuries and deaths to more indirect effects like the suspension of access to preventive and curative medical care.

METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional multicenter health facility-based study aiming to study the impact of the April 15 war on hemodialysis patients in Sudan. The study was conducted in five centers in four different states in Sudan, including Gezira State, Red Sea State, River Nile State, and Kassala State. The study included 316 participants. Data was collected using structured interviews guided by a questionnaire. The questionnaire encompassed five primary domains: demographic data, healthcare access (Levesque's Conceptual Framework of Access), physical implications, psychological impact (Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale and Patient health questionnaire), and quality of life (Kidney disease quality of life 36 scales). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

This study involved 316 participants, with an average age of 47.14 and 63.9% being males. After the war, 74.7% reported being unemployed. 30.1% of participants had to flee their homes, and 18.7% had a renal ailment limiting their travel. Among the components of healthcare access affordability, it received the lowest score (5.6 out of 10). More than half of the participants were unable to maintain their regular hemodialysis sessions (56.9%) throughout the war, and 65.2% of the participants developed medical complications as a result. The GAD assessment showed 62.7% of participants had significant anxiety symptoms, while 40.5% had significant depression symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Hemodialysis patients' suffering has increased as a result of the war. Hemodialysis patients experience severe mental health problems in addition to physiological problems, including depression and anxiety, as a result of internal displacement and their inability to continue regular hemodialysis sessions. The study advocates for the implementation of a permanent ceasefire in conflict zones to ensure the delivery of critical humanitarian medical aid, particularly hemodialysis care. The study encourages stronger advocacy for hemodialysis in war-torn areas as well as collaboration with international organizations to provide such specialized care. Finally, it encourages the use of telemedicine services as a backup plan to provide continuous hemodialysis consultation and care in the event of conflict disruptions.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063d/11744938/b5d63512e451/12889_2025_21369_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063d/11744938/be4ddb78389e/12889_2025_21369_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063d/11744938/b5d63512e451/12889_2025_21369_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063d/11744938/be4ddb78389e/12889_2025_21369_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063d/11744938/b5d63512e451/12889_2025_21369_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

2023年4月15日,苏丹武装部队(SAF)与准军事快速支援部队(RSF)在苏丹首都喀土穆发生了涉及重型武器和空袭的激烈冲突,导致近810万人流离失所。苏丹持续的武装冲突导致人道主义灾难不断恶化,给该国的医疗系统带来了严峻挑战,甚至使其濒临崩溃。医疗设施受到严重影响,冲突地区仅有约三分之一的医院仍在运营。血液透析患者是这场战争后果的最受影响群体之一,这些后果既包括暴力相关伤害和死亡等明显危险,也包括预防和治疗性医疗服务中断等更间接的影响。

方法

这是一项基于多中心医疗机构的描述性横断面研究,旨在研究4月15日战争对苏丹血液透析患者的影响。该研究在苏丹四个不同州的五个中心进行,包括杰济拉州、红海州、尼罗河州和卡萨拉州。研究包括316名参与者。数据通过由问卷指导的结构化访谈收集。问卷涵盖五个主要领域:人口统计学数据、医疗服务可及性(勒维克的可及性概念框架)、身体影响、心理影响(广泛性焦虑障碍量表和患者健康问卷)以及生活质量(肾脏病生活质量36量表)。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)26版进行数据分析。

结果

本研究涉及316名参与者,平均年龄为47.14岁,男性占63.9%。战争结束后,74.7%的人报告失业。30.1%的参与者不得不逃离家园,18.7%的人患有肾脏疾病限制了他们的出行。在医疗服务可及性可负担性的各项指标中,该指标得分最低(满分10分,得5.6分)。超过一半的参与者在整个战争期间无法维持定期血液透析治疗(56.9%),65.2%的参与者因此出现了医疗并发症。广泛性焦虑障碍评估显示,62.7%的参与者有明显的焦虑症状,40.5%的参与者有明显的抑郁症状。

结论

战争导致血液透析患者的痛苦加剧。由于国内流离失所以及无法继续进行定期血液透析治疗,血液透析患者除了生理问题外,还经历了严重的心理健康问题,包括抑郁和焦虑。该研究主张在冲突地区实现永久停火,以确保提供关键的人道主义医疗援助,特别是血液透析治疗。该研究鼓励在饱受战争蹂躏的地区加强对血液透析的宣传,并与国际组织合作提供此类专业护理。最后,它鼓励使用远程医疗服务作为备用计划,以便在冲突中断时提供持续的血液透析咨询和护理。

相似文献

1
April 15th war and hemodialysis patients in Sudan: a cross-sectional study.4月15日战争与苏丹的血液透析患者:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21369-4.
2
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.针对患有长期身体疾病的儿童和青少年焦虑与抑郁的电子健康干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012489.pub2.
9
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders.精神障碍患者随机试验中的对照干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):MR000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000050.pub2.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of life and access to healthcare among hemodialysis patients during wartime: cross-sectional insights from Gaza.战时血液透析患者的生活质量与医疗服务可及性:来自加沙的横断面见解
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jul 9;26(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04322-w.
2
End-stage kidney diseases in areas of conflict: patients' perspective and patient access to hemodialysis services in Northwest Syria.冲突地区的终末期肾病:叙利亚西北部患者的观点及患者获得血液透析服务的情况
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 2;25(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12673-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The implications of the Sudan war on healthcare workers and facilities: a health system tragedy.苏丹战争对医护人员和医疗设施的影响:一场卫生系统的悲剧。
Confl Health. 2024 Mar 17;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13031-024-00581-w.
2
Sudan's healthcare crisis: The struggle of kidney patients amidst conflict.苏丹的医疗危机:冲突中肾病患者的挣扎
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 13;7(3):e1980. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1980. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Providing Hemodialysis in Unstable Areas: An Assessment and Framework for Effective Care.在不稳定地区提供血液透析:有效护理的评估与框架
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Dec 20;9(3):580-588. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.12.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Mental health consequences among Sudanese due to the armed conflicts and civil unrest of 2023: a cross-sectional study.2023年武装冲突和内乱对苏丹人心理健康的影响:一项横断面研究
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 May;70(3):563-573. doi: 10.1177/00207640231221101. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
5
Exploring the health consequences of armed conflict: the perspective of Northeast Ethiopia, 2022: a qualitative study.探讨武装冲突对健康的影响:以 2022 年埃塞俄比亚东北部为例:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 24;23(1):2078. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16983-z.
6
Destruction, disruption and disaster: Sudan's health system amidst armed conflict.破坏、混乱与灾难:武装冲突下的苏丹卫生系统
Confl Health. 2023 Sep 27;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13031-023-00542-9.
7
Anxiety and depression in maintenance hemodialysis patients: prevalence and their effects on health-related quality of life.维持性血液透析患者的焦虑和抑郁:患病率及其对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Nov;55(11):2905-2914. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03556-7. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
8
War in Ukraine and dialysis treatment: human suffering and organizational challenges.乌克兰战争与透析治疗:人类苦难与组织挑战
Clin Kidney J. 2023 Jan 5;16(4):676-683. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad003. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
The health consequences of civil wars: evidence from Afghanistan.内战对健康的影响:来自阿富汗的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14720-6.
10
Vicarious trauma on the hemodialysis healthcare workers in the besieged Ethiopia's Tigray region: a call to action.被围困的埃塞俄比亚提格雷地区血液透析医护人员替代性创伤:行动呼吁。
BMC Med. 2022 Nov 8;20(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02637-1.