Richards Shauna, Pagnossin Davide, Buyugu Paul Samson, Manangwa Oliver, Mramba Furaha, Sindoya Emmanuel, Paxton Edith, Torr Steve J, Ritchie Ryan, Rossi Giovanni E, Anyanwu Lawrence Nnadozie, Barrett Michael P, Morrison Liam J, Auty Harriet
International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Jan 21;19(1):e0012541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012541. eCollection 2025 Jan.
African animal trypanosomosis (AAT) in cattle is primarily managed through trypanocide administration and insecticide application. Trypanocides can be used for both treatment and prophylaxis, but failure is often reported; this may occur due to resistance, substandard drugs, or inappropriate administration. This study in Tanzania aims to quantify reasons for trypanocide failure. An observational year-long longitudinal study was conducted in high-risk AAT areas in Serengeti District between June 2021-October 2022. Purposive sampling targeted herds with high utilization of the prophylactic trypanocide isometamidium chloride (ISM). When a farmer administered a trypanocide (ISM, diminazine aceturate, homidium), the project veterinarian assessed administration and treatment outcomes were determined based on PCR results from blood samples. A multivariable mixed model was utilized to evaluate risk factors for prophylaxis failure. Quality analysis was performed on trypanocide samples using High Performance Liquid Chromatography. A total of 630 cattle from 21 farms were monitored for a year-long period. A total of 295 trypanocide administrations were reported, predominantly being ISM (56%) used for prophylaxis (87%). One-third of trypanocide administrations were not given adequately, and many trypanocides were given to animals that tested negative for trypanosome infections by PCR. Failures occurred in 7% (95% CI 3.0-14%) of curative treatments, and 44% (95% CI 35-42%) of prophylactic administrations. The brand of ISM was significantly associated with odds of prophylaxis failure (p = 0.011). On quality analysis, two ISM samples had no detectable ISM isomers, but the remainder of ISM and DA samples (n = 46) fell within the range of acceptable levels. Drug counterfeiting, inadequate use of trypanocides, and resistance are all contributing to trypanocide failure, limiting effective AAT control and with implications for human disease risk. In order to curb trypanocide failure a multi-modal approach to managing the use of trypanocides is required to address all contributing factors.
牛的非洲动物锥虫病(AAT)主要通过施用杀锥虫剂和喷洒杀虫剂来控制。杀锥虫剂可用于治疗和预防,但经常有治疗失败的报道;这可能是由于耐药性、药品不合格或用药不当所致。坦桑尼亚的这项研究旨在量化杀锥虫剂治疗失败的原因。2021年6月至2022年10月期间,在塞伦盖蒂区的高风险AAT地区开展了一项为期一年的观察性纵向研究。采用目的抽样法,选取预防性使用杀锥虫剂氯咪巴唑(ISM)比例高的畜群。当养殖户施用杀锥虫剂(ISM、乙酰氨基苯脒、台盼红)时,项目兽医对用药情况进行评估,并根据血样的PCR结果确定治疗效果。采用多变量混合模型评估预防失败的风险因素。使用高效液相色谱法对杀锥虫剂样本进行质量分析。对来自21个农场的630头牛进行了为期一年的监测。共报告了295次杀锥虫剂施用情况,主要是用于预防(87%)的ISM(56%)。三分之一的杀锥虫剂施用不当,许多杀锥虫剂被施用于经PCR检测锥虫感染呈阴性的动物。7%(95%CI 3.0-14%)的治疗性用药出现失败,44%(95%CI 35-42%)的预防性用药出现失败。ISM的品牌与预防失败的几率显著相关(p = 0.011)。质量分析显示,两份ISM样本未检测到ISM异构体,但其余的ISM和乙酰氨基苯脒样本(n = 46)在可接受水平范围内。假药、杀锥虫剂使用不当和耐药性都是导致杀锥虫剂治疗失败的原因,限制了AAT的有效控制,并对人类疾病风险产生影响。为了遏制杀锥虫剂治疗失败的情况,需要采取多模式方法来管理杀锥虫剂的使用,以解决所有促成因素。