Cohen Liora, Shiovitz-Ezra Sharon, Cohen Avi, Erlich Bracha
Israel Gerontological Data Center (IGDC), The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan 25;44(10):7334648251314938. doi: 10.1177/07334648251314938.
The study identified care network types comprising informal and formal care providers during the end-of-life period, and examined their relationship with home deaths. End-of-life interviews were conducted with proxies during the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The sample included 486 participants who passed away during the pandemic and received care during their final year. Latent Class Analysis identified three care network types: "mixed-care", mostly consisting of adult children in an informal network; "spouse", dominated by spouses with adult children and formal caregivers; and "professional", mainly with formal caregivers and some informal support. Patients with mixed-care were more likely to die at home compared to those with professional networks. Informal care, particularly from adult children, played a crucial role in end-of-life care. Policymakers should support adult children in end-of-life care and promote effective models that integrate formal care services.
该研究确定了临终阶段由非正式和正式护理提供者组成的护理网络类型,并研究了它们与在家中死亡的关系。在欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)中,在新冠疫情的两波期间,对代理人进行了临终访谈。样本包括486名在疫情期间去世且在最后一年接受护理的参与者。潜在类别分析确定了三种护理网络类型:“混合护理”,主要由非正式网络中的成年子女组成;“配偶护理”,以配偶、成年子女和正式护理人员为主;“专业护理”,主要是正式护理人员和一些非正式支持。与拥有专业网络的患者相比,接受混合护理的患者更有可能在家中死亡。非正式护理,尤其是来自成年子女的护理,在临终护理中发挥了关键作用。政策制定者应在临终护理方面支持成年子女,并推广整合正式护理服务的有效模式。