Censkowsky Philipp, Waidelich Paul, Shishlov Igor, Steffen Bjarne
Department of Strategy, Globalization and Society, University of Lausanne (HEC Lausanne), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Perspectives Climate Research gGmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 29;16(1):900. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-55981-0.
By providing guarantees and direct lending, public export credit agencies (ECAs) de-risk and thus enable energy projects worldwide. Despite their importance for global greenhouse gas emission pathways, a systematic assessment of ECAs' role and financing patterns in the low-carbon energy transition is still needed. Using commercial transaction data, here we analyze 921 energy deals backed by ECAs from 31 OECD and non-OECD countries (excluding Canada) between 2013 and 2023. We find that while the share of renewables in global ECA energy commitments rose substantially between 2013 and 2023, ECAs remain heavily involved in the fossil fuel sector, with support varying substantially across technologies, value chain stages, and countries. Portfolio 'greening' is primarily driven by members of the E3F climate club, impacting deal financing structures and shifting finance flows towards high-income countries. Our results call for reconsidering ECA mandates and strengthening international climate-related cooperation in export finance.
通过提供担保和直接贷款,公共出口信贷机构(ECA)降低了风险,从而推动了全球能源项目的发展。尽管它们对全球温室气体排放路径至关重要,但仍需要对ECA在低碳能源转型中的作用和融资模式进行系统评估。利用商业交易数据,我们在此分析了2013年至2023年期间来自31个经合组织国家和非经合组织国家(不包括加拿大)的由ECA支持的921笔能源交易。我们发现,虽然2013年至2023年期间可再生能源在全球ECA能源承诺中的份额大幅上升,但ECA仍深度参与化石燃料行业,其支持在技术、价值链阶段和国家之间存在很大差异。投资组合的“绿化”主要由E3F气候俱乐部的成员推动,影响交易融资结构,并使资金流向高收入国家。我们的研究结果呼吁重新考虑ECA的任务授权,并加强出口融资领域与气候相关的国际合作。