Vrijling Anne C L, de Boer Minke J, Renken Remco J, Marsman Jan-Bernard C, Heutink Joost, Cornelissen Frans W, Jansonius Nomdo M
Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Royal Dutch Visio, Centre of Expertise for Blind and Partially Sighted People, Huizen, The Netherlands.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 3;14(2):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.2.3.
Continuous visual stimulus tracking could be used as an easy alternative to standard automated perimetry (SAP) for visual function screening. With continuous visual stimulus tracking, we simplified the perimetric task to following a moving dot on a screen with the eyes. Here, we determined whether tracking performance (the agreement between gaze and stimulus position) enables the detection and quantification of glaucomatous visual function loss (in terms of SAP), and whether it shows a learning effect.
We evaluated the tracking performance of 36 cases with early, moderate, or severe glaucoma (median with interquartile range [IQR] age = 70 [67-74] years) and 36 controls (median = 70, IQR = 67-72 years). All participants monocularly tracked a moving stimulus (Goldmann size III) at 3 Weber contrast levels: 40, 160, and 640%, while their eye movements were recorded.
Glaucoma decreased the tracking performance, with the most severe reduction in the severe glaucoma cases. A distinction between groups was possible, but depended on the contrast level: tracking performance of early glaucoma cases was significantly different from controls only at 40% contrast. Within the cases, glaucomatous visual function loss (SAP Mean Sensitivity [MS]) was best correlated with tracking performance when using 160% contrast. There was no significant learning effect.
Overall, the data indicate that it is possible to detect and quantify glaucomatous visual function loss with continuous visual stimulus tracking.
Continuous visual stimulus tracking is an easy, fast, and intuitive technique that has the potential for diagnostic applications in detection of new glaucoma cases and monitoring of previously diagnosed cases.
连续视觉刺激跟踪可作为标准自动视野计(SAP)用于视觉功能筛查的一种简便替代方法。通过连续视觉刺激跟踪,我们将视野检查任务简化为用眼睛跟踪屏幕上的一个移动点。在此,我们确定跟踪性能(注视与刺激位置之间的一致性)是否能够检测和量化青光眼性视觉功能丧失(根据SAP),以及它是否显示出学习效应。
我们评估了36例早期、中度或重度青光眼患者(年龄中位数及四分位间距[IQR] = 70[67 - 74]岁)和36名对照者(中位数 = 70,IQR = 67 - 72岁)的跟踪性能。所有参与者单眼跟踪一个移动刺激物(戈德曼III号视标),对比度水平为3种:40%、160%和640%,同时记录他们的眼动情况。
青光眼降低了跟踪性能,重度青光眼病例下降最为严重。可以区分不同组,但这取决于对比度水平:仅在40%对比度时,早期青光眼病例的跟踪性能与对照者有显著差异。在病例组中,使用160%对比度时,青光眼性视觉功能丧失(SAP平均敏感度[MS])与跟踪性能的相关性最佳。没有显著的学习效应。
总体而言,数据表明通过连续视觉刺激跟踪能够检测和量化青光眼性视觉功能丧失。
连续视觉刺激跟踪是一种简便、快速且直观的技术,在检测新的青光眼病例和监测先前诊断的病例方面具有诊断应用潜力。