Kamali Elaheh, Saffar Shahroudi Atefe, Chiniforush Nasim, Ghadirian Hannaneh
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Islamic Republic of.
University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Mar 25;40(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04411-0.
One of the methods to reduce microbial plaque is antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT). The present study evaluated the different output power of diode laser(DL) and two photosensitizers in aPDT against microbial plaque around orthodontic brackets.
In this experimental laboratory research, the buccal surface of fifty-four human premolar teeth was prepared for metal bracket bond. The samples were contaminated with Streptococcus mutans suspension to form a bacterial biofilm. After ensuring the presence of bacteria in the samples taken out from the incubator (37 °C for 72 h), they were randomly divided into following groups: 100 µg/mL toluidine blue (TBO) with DL radiation at 200, 300, 400, and 500 mW, 1000 µg/mL phycocyanin (PC) with DL at aforementioned output powers, TBO and PC without light activation, negative control and chlorhexidine After treatment, the colonies were counted using the Miles and Misra method. One-way ANOVA, Tamhane, and Two-way ANOVA were implemented for statistical analysis.
The bacterial colonies when using TBO were significantly lower than PC at all laser powers (p < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons of different output powers in each photosensitizer, showed that as the output power was increased, the more bacteria were eliminated. A comparison of studied groups with chlorhexidine showed a significant difference in favor of chlorhexidine (p < 0.05).
Both photosensitizers activated by each of the powers resulted in significant S.mutans colonies reduction compared to the negative control. However, a greater reduction was observed with 500mW output power. TBO was more effective than the PC.
Not applicable.
减少微生物菌斑的方法之一是抗菌光动力疗法(aPDT)。本研究评估了二极管激光(DL)的不同输出功率以及两种光敏剂在aPDT中对正畸托槽周围微生物菌斑的作用。
在这项实验性实验室研究中,对54颗人类前磨牙的颊面进行准备以粘结金属托槽。样本用变形链球菌悬液污染以形成细菌生物膜。在确保从培养箱(37℃,72小时)取出的样本中存在细菌后,将它们随机分为以下几组:100μg/mL甲苯胺蓝(TBO),分别用200、300、400和500mW的DL照射;1000μg/mL藻蓝蛋白(PC),用上述输出功率的DL照射;未进行光激活的TBO和PC;阴性对照和氯己定。处理后,使用迈尔斯和米斯拉方法对菌落进行计数。采用单因素方差分析、塔姆哈尼检验和双因素方差分析进行统计分析。
在所有激光功率下,使用TBO时的细菌菌落数均显著低于使用PC时(p<0.05)。对每种光敏剂不同输出功率进行两两比较,结果显示随着输出功率增加,消除的细菌越多。与氯己定组相比,研究组之间存在显著差异,氯己定组更具优势(p<0.05)。
与阴性对照相比,每种功率激活的两种光敏剂均导致变形链球菌菌落显著减少。然而,500mW输出功率时减少幅度更大。TBO比PC更有效。
不适用。