• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌风险预测模型的系统评价与荟萃分析

A systematic review and meta-analysis of lung cancer risk prediction models.

作者信息

Khalife Ghida, Nilsson Matilda, Peltola Lotta, Waris Juho, Jekunen Antti, Leskelä Riikka-Leena, Andersén Heidi, Nuutinen Mikko, Heikkilä Eija, Nurmi-Rantala Susanna, Torkki Paulus

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Oncol. 2025 May 12;64:661-671. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42529.

DOI:10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42529
PMID:40356086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12086449/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer (LC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early detection through targeted screening significantly improves patient outcomes. However, identifying high-risk individuals remains a critical challenge.

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluates externally validated LC risk prediction models to assess their performance and potential applicability in screening strategies.

METHODS

Of the 11,805 initial studies, 66 met inclusion criteria and 38 published mainly between 2020 and 2024 were included in the final analysis. Model methodologies, validation approaches, and performance metrics were extracted and compared.

RESULTS

The review identified 18 models utilising conventional machine learning, six employing neural networks, and 14 comparing different predictive frameworks. The Prostate Lung Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCOm2012) demonstrated superior sensitivity across diverse populations, while newer models, such as Optimized Early Warning model for Lung cancer risk (OWL) and CanPredict, showed promising results. However, differences in population demographics and healthcare systems may limit the generalisability of these models.

INTERPRETATION

While LC risk prediction models have advanced, their applicability to specific healthcare systems, such as Finland's, requires further adaptation and validation. Future research should focus on optimising these models for local contexts to improve clinical impact and cost-effectiveness in targeted screening programmes.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022321391.

摘要

背景

肺癌仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。通过靶向筛查进行早期检测可显著改善患者预后。然而,识别高危个体仍然是一项严峻挑战。

目的

本系统评价对外验证的肺癌风险预测模型进行评估,以评估其在筛查策略中的性能和潜在适用性。

方法

在11805项初始研究中,66项符合纳入标准,最终分析纳入了38项主要在2020年至2024年期间发表的研究。提取并比较了模型方法、验证方法和性能指标。

结果

该评价确定了18个使用传统机器学习的模型、6个采用神经网络的模型以及14个比较不同预测框架的模型。前列腺、肺、结肠和卵巢癌筛查试验(PLCOm2012)在不同人群中表现出较高的敏感性,而较新的模型,如肺癌风险优化早期预警模型(OWL)和CanPredict,显示出有前景的结果。然而,人群人口统计学和医疗系统的差异可能会限制这些模型的通用性。

解读

虽然肺癌风险预测模型已经取得进展,但其在特定医疗系统(如芬兰)中的适用性需要进一步调整和验证。未来的研究应侧重于针对当地情况优化这些模型,以提高靶向筛查计划中的临床影响和成本效益。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42022321391。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bce/12086449/f93bd421b26f/AO-64-42529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bce/12086449/f93bd421b26f/AO-64-42529-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bce/12086449/f93bd421b26f/AO-64-42529-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of lung cancer risk prediction models.肺癌风险预测模型的系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Oncol. 2025 May 12;64:661-671. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42529.
2
Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.预测肺癌未来风险:CanPredict(肺部)模型在 1967 万人中的开发、内部和外部验证以及该模型与其他七个风险预测模型的性能评估。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Aug;11(8):685-697. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00050-4. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
3
OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.OWL:一种基于英国生物银行、PLCO 和 NLST 人群的肺癌筛查的优化和独立验证的机器学习预测模型。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Feb;88:104443. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104443. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
4
Predictive performance of risk prediction models for lung cancer incidence in Western and Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.西方国家和亚洲国家肺癌发病风险预测模型的预测性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 4;15(1):4259. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83875-6.
5
Deep Learning Using Chest Radiographs to Identify High-Risk Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model.利用胸部X光片进行深度学习以识别肺癌筛查计算机断层扫描的高危吸烟者:预测模型的开发与验证
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 3;173(9):704-713. doi: 10.7326/M20-1868. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Assessing eligibility for lung cancer screening using parsimonious ensemble machine learning models: A development and validation study.采用简约集成机器学习模型评估肺癌筛查的资格:一项开发和验证研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Oct 3;20(10):e1004287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004287. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Risk Prediction Models for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.肺癌风险预测模型:一项系统综述。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Mar;17(2):95-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
8
Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO risk prediction tool.确定高危人群进行有针对性的肺癌筛查:PLCO 风险预测工具的独立验证。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):242-253. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30673. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Evaluation of risk prediction models to select lung cancer screening participants in Europe: a prospective cohort consortium analysis.评估风险预测模型以选择欧洲的肺癌筛查参与者:一项前瞻性队列联盟分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Sep;6(9):e614-e624. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00123-7.
10
USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.USPSTF2013 与 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准(国际肺癌筛查试验):前瞻性队列研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8. Epub 2021 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung Cancer in Finland.芬兰的肺癌
J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Sep;19(9):1265-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.06.005.
2
Improving Lung Cancer Screening Selection: The HUNT Lung Cancer Risk Model for Ever-Smokers Versus the NELSON and 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force Criteria in the Cohort of Norway: A Population-Based Prospective Study.改善肺癌筛查选择:挪威队列中针对既往吸烟者的HUNT肺癌风险模型与NELSON及2021年美国预防服务工作组标准的比较:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024 Mar 5;5(4):100660. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100660. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Lung Cancer Prediction Using Electronic Claims Records: A Transformer-Based Approach.
基于 Transformer 的电子理赔记录肺癌预测方法。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023 Dec;27(12):6062-6073. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2023.3324191. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
4
Assessing eligibility for lung cancer screening using parsimonious ensemble machine learning models: A development and validation study.采用简约集成机器学习模型评估肺癌筛查的资格:一项开发和验证研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Oct 3;20(10):e1004287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004287. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Lung cancer risk score for ever and never smokers in China.中国的终身和从不吸烟者肺癌风险评分。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2023 Aug;43(8):877-895. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12463. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Lung cancer risk discrimination of prediagnostic proteomics measurements compared with existing prediction tools.比较预诊断蛋白质组学测量与现有预测工具的肺癌风险判别。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Sep 7;115(9):1050-1059. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad071.
7
Survival in Lung Cancer in the Nordic Countries Through A Half Century.北欧国家肺癌患者半个世纪以来的生存率
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 May 1;15:503-510. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S406606. eCollection 2023.
8
Development and validation of a simple general population lung cancer risk model including AHRR-methylation.开发并验证了一种简单的一般人群肺癌风险模型,其中包括 AHRR 甲基化。
Lung Cancer. 2023 Jul;181:107229. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107229. Epub 2023 May 3.
9
Evaluation of the accuracy of the PLCO 6-year lung cancer risk prediction model among smokers in the CARTaGENE population-based cohort.评估 PLCO 6 年肺癌风险预测模型在 CARTaGENE 基于人群队列中吸烟者中的准确性。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Apr 11;11(2):E314-E322. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210335. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
10
Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.预测肺癌未来风险:CanPredict(肺部)模型在 1967 万人中的开发、内部和外部验证以及该模型与其他七个风险预测模型的性能评估。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Aug;11(8):685-697. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00050-4. Epub 2023 Apr 5.