• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较预诊断蛋白质组学测量与现有预测工具的肺癌风险判别。

Lung cancer risk discrimination of prediagnostic proteomics measurements compared with existing prediction tools.

机构信息

Genomic Epidemiology Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.

Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umea University, Umea, Sweden.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Sep 7;115(9):1050-1059. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad071.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djad071
PMID:37260165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10483263/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We sought to develop a proteomics-based risk model for lung cancer and evaluate its risk-discriminatory performance in comparison with a smoking-based risk model (PLCOm2012) and a commercially available autoantibody biomarker test.

METHODS

We designed a case-control study nested in 6 prospective cohorts, including 624 lung cancer participants who donated blood samples at most 3 years prior to lung cancer diagnosis and 624 smoking-matched cancer free participants who were assayed for 302 proteins. We used 470 case-control pairs from 4 cohorts to select proteins and train a protein-based risk model. We subsequently used 154 case-control pairs from 2 cohorts to compare the risk-discriminatory performance of the protein-based model with that of the Early Cancer Detection Test (EarlyCDT)-Lung and the PLCOm2012 model using receiver operating characteristics analysis and by estimating models' sensitivity. All tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

The area under the curve for the protein-based risk model in the validation sample was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.70 to 0.81) compared with 0.64 (95% CI = 0.57 to 0.70) for the PLCOm2012 model (Pdifference = .001). The EarlyCDT-Lung had a sensitivity of 14% (95% CI = 8.2% to 19%) and a specificity of 86% (95% CI = 81% to 92%) for incident lung cancer. At the same specificity of 86%, the sensitivity for the protein-based risk model was estimated at 49% (95% CI = 41% to 57%) and 30% (95% CI = 23% to 37%) for the PLCOm2012 model.

CONCLUSION

Circulating proteins showed promise in predicting incident lung cancer and outperformed a standard risk prediction model and the commercialized EarlyCDT-Lung.

摘要

背景

我们旨在开发一种基于蛋白质组学的肺癌风险模型,并将其风险区分性能与基于吸烟的风险模型(PLCOm2012)和商业化的自身抗体生物标志物检测进行比较。

方法

我们设计了一项病例对照研究,嵌套在 6 个前瞻性队列中,包括 624 名在肺癌诊断前最多 3 年内捐献血液样本的肺癌患者和 624 名接受 302 种蛋白质检测的吸烟匹配无癌症患者。我们使用来自 4 个队列的 470 个病例对照对来选择蛋白质并训练基于蛋白质的风险模型。随后,我们使用来自 2 个队列的 154 个病例对照对来比较基于蛋白质的模型与早期癌症检测测试(EarlyCDT-Lung)和 PLCOm2012 模型的风险区分性能,使用接受者操作特征分析和估计模型的敏感性。所有测试均为双侧。

结果

验证样本中基于蛋白质的风险模型的曲线下面积为 0.75(95%置信区间[CI] = 0.70 至 0.81),而 PLCOm2012 模型为 0.64(95% CI = 0.57 至 0.70)(P 差异= 0.001)。EarlyCDT-Lung 对新发肺癌的敏感性为 14%(95% CI = 8.2%至 19%),特异性为 86%(95% CI = 81%至 92%)。在相同的特异性为 86%时,基于蛋白质的风险模型的敏感性估计为 49%(95% CI = 41%至 57%)和 30%(95% CI = 23%至 37%)为 PLCOm2012 模型。

结论

循环蛋白在预测新发肺癌方面具有潜力,优于标准风险预测模型和商业化的 EarlyCDT-Lung。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4985/10483263/d468afa92d59/djad071f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4985/10483263/790ceacb3a92/djad071f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4985/10483263/d468afa92d59/djad071f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4985/10483263/790ceacb3a92/djad071f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4985/10483263/d468afa92d59/djad071f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Lung cancer risk discrimination of prediagnostic proteomics measurements compared with existing prediction tools.比较预诊断蛋白质组学测量与现有预测工具的肺癌风险判别。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Sep 7;115(9):1050-1059. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad071.
2
Assessment of the EarlyCDT-Lung test as an early biomarker of lung cancer in ever-smokers: A retrospective nested case-control study in two prospective cohorts.评估 EarlyCDT-Lung 试验作为两个前瞻性队列中持续吸烟者肺癌的早期生物标志物:一项回顾性巢式病例对照研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 May 1;152(9):2002-2010. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34340. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
3
Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO risk prediction tool.确定高危人群进行有针对性的肺癌筛查:PLCO 风险预测工具的独立验证。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):242-253. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30673. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.OWL:一种基于英国生物银行、PLCO 和 NLST 人群的肺癌筛查的优化和独立验证的机器学习预测模型。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Feb;88:104443. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104443. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk Assessment.基于血液的生物标志物panel 用于个体化肺癌风险评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;40(8):876-883. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01460. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Evaluation of the accuracy of the PLCO 6-year lung cancer risk prediction model among smokers in the CARTaGENE population-based cohort.评估 PLCO 6 年肺癌风险预测模型在 CARTaGENE 基于人群队列中吸烟者中的准确性。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Apr 11;11(2):E314-E322. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210335. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
7
Assessment of Lung Cancer Risk on the Basis of a Biomarker Panel of Circulating Proteins.基于循环蛋白生物标志物面板评估肺癌风险。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):e182078. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2078. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
Assessing Different Approaches to Leveraging Historical Smoking Exposure Data to Better Select Lung Cancer Screening Candidates: A Retrospective Validation Study.评估利用历史吸烟暴露数据的不同方法以更好地选择肺癌筛查候选人:一项回顾性验证研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 4;23(8):1334-1340. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa192.
9
Evaluation of risk prediction models to select lung cancer screening participants in Europe: a prospective cohort consortium analysis.评估风险预测模型以选择欧洲的肺癌筛查参与者:一项前瞻性队列联盟分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Sep;6(9):e614-e624. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00123-7.
10
USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.USPSTF2013 与 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准(国际肺癌筛查试验):前瞻性队列研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jan;23(1):138-148. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00590-8. Epub 2021 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Circulating proteins associated with histological subtypes of lung cancer from genetic and population-based perspectives.从基因和人群角度看与肺癌组织学亚型相关的循环蛋白。
PLoS Genet. 2025 Aug 25;21(8):e1011821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011821. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
T cell receptor profiling of blood to detect lung cancer.通过血液进行T细胞受体分析以检测肺癌。
Cancer Immunol Res. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-24-1109.
3
SPAG11B, a potential biomarker for rheumatoid arthritis: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The blood proteome of imminent lung cancer diagnosis.肺癌早期诊断的血液蛋白质组学。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jun 1;14(1):3042. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37979-8.
2
Design and methodological considerations for biomarker discovery and validation in the Integrative Analysis of Lung Cancer Etiology and Risk (INTEGRAL) Program.在肺癌病因和风险综合分析(INTEGRAL)计划中进行生物标志物发现和验证的设计和方法学考虑。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Jan;77:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.10.014. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
3
Assessment of the EarlyCDT-Lung test as an early biomarker of lung cancer in ever-smokers: A retrospective nested case-control study in two prospective cohorts.
SPAG11B,类风湿性关节炎的一种潜在生物标志物:一项两样本双向孟德尔随机化分析
BMC Rheumatol. 2025 Jun 4;9(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s41927-025-00521-y.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of lung cancer risk prediction models.肺癌风险预测模型的系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Oncol. 2025 May 12;64:661-671. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42529.
5
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus statement on essential biomarkers for immunotherapy clinical protocols.癌症免疫治疗学会(SITC)关于免疫治疗临床方案关键生物标志物的共识声明。
J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Mar 7;13(3):e010928. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010928.
6
LcProt: Proteomics-based identification of plasma biomarkers for lung cancer multievent, a multicentre study.LcProt:基于蛋白质组学的肺癌多事件血浆生物标志物鉴定,一项多中心研究。
Clin Transl Med. 2025 Jan;15(1):e70160. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70160.
7
Pitfalls in interpreting calibration in comparative evaluations of risk models for precision lung cancer screening.精准肺癌筛查风险模型比较评估中校准解读的陷阱
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Dec 19;8(1):281. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00785-6.
8
Prognostic value of circulating proteins at diagnosis among patients with lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis by smoking status.肺癌患者诊断时循环蛋白的预后价值:基于吸烟状态的综合分析
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Sep 30;13(9):2326-2339. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-242. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
9
Protein Biomarkers in Lung Cancer Screening: Technical Considerations and Feasibility Assessment.肺癌筛查中的蛋白质生物标志物:技术考虑因素和可行性评估。
Arch Bronconeumol. 2024 Oct;60 Suppl 2:S67-S76. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2024.07.007. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
10
Data Resource Profile: The HUNT Biobank.数据资源简介:HUNT生物样本库
Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 11;53(3). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae073.
评估 EarlyCDT-Lung 试验作为两个前瞻性队列中持续吸烟者肺癌的早期生物标志物:一项回顾性巢式病例对照研究。
Int J Cancer. 2023 May 1;152(9):2002-2010. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34340. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
4
Performance of the EarlyCDT® Lung test in detection of lung cancer and pulmonary metastases in a high-risk cohort.早期 CDT® 肺试验在高危人群中检测肺癌和肺转移的性能。
Lung Cancer. 2021 Aug;158:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
6
Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.肺癌低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查的获益与危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):988-997. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1077.
7
Prospective Identification of Elevated Circulating CDCP1 in Patients Years before Onset of Lung Cancer.前瞻性鉴定肺癌发病前数年循环 CDCP1 水平升高。
Cancer Res. 2021 Jul 1;81(13):3738-3748. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-3454. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
8
Can autoantibody tests enhance lung cancer screening?-an evaluation of EarlyCDT-Lung in context of the German Lung Cancer Screening Intervention Trial (LUSI).自身抗体检测能否增强肺癌筛查?——在德国肺癌筛查干预试验(LUSI)背景下对EarlyCDT-Lung的评估。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jan;10(1):233-242. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-727.
9
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
Using Prediction Models to Reduce Persistent Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Draft 2020 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines.利用预测模型减少 2020 年 USPSTF 肺癌筛查指南草案中持续存在的种族和民族差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1590-1594. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa211.