Leveraging deep learning-based kernel conversion for more precise airway quantification on CT.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the variability of fully automated airway quantitative CT (QCT) measures caused by different kernels and the effect of kernel conversion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 96 patients who underwent non-enhanced chest CT at two centers. CT scans were reconstructed using four kernels (medium soft, medium sharp, sharp, very sharp) from three vendors. Kernel conversion targeting the medium soft kernel as reference was applied to sharp kernel images. Fully automated airway quantification was performed before and after conversion. The effects of kernel type and conversion on airway quantification were evaluated using analysis of variance, paired t-tests, and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

RESULTS

Airway QCT measures (e.g., Pi10, wall thickness, wall area percentage, lumen diameter) decreased with sharper kernels (all, p < 0.001), with varying degrees of variability across variables and vendors. Kernel conversion substantially reduced variability between medium soft and sharp kernel images for vendors A (pooled CCC: 0.59 vs. 0.92) and B (0.40 vs. 0.91) and lung-dedicated sharp kernels of vendor C (0.26 vs. 0.71). However, it was ineffective for non-lung-dedicated sharp kernels of vendor C (0.81 vs. 0.43) and showed limited improvement in variability of QCT measures at the subsegmental level. Consistent airway segmentation and identical anatomic labeling improved subsegmental airway variability in theoretical tests.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning-based kernel conversion reduced the measurement variability of airway QCT across various kernels and vendors but was less effective for non-lung-dedicated kernels and subsegmental airways. Consistent airway segmentation and precise anatomic labeling can further enhance reproducibility for reliable automated quantification.

KEY POINTS

Question How do different CT reconstruction kernels affect the measurement variability of automated airway measurements, and can deep learning-based kernel conversion reduce this variability? Findings Kernel conversion improved measurement consistency across vendors for lung-dedicated kernels, but showed limited effectiveness for non-lung-dedicated kernels and subsegmental airways. Clinical relevance Understanding kernel-related variability in airway quantification and mitigating it through deep learning enables standardized analysis, but further refinements are needed for robust airway segmentation, particularly for improving measurement variability in subsegmental airways and specific kernels.