Cruz Célio, Querido Ana, Pedrosa Vanda Varela
School of Health Sciences of the Polytechnic University of Leiria, Campus 2, Morro do Lena, Alto do Vieiro, Apartado 4137, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.
Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), Polytechnic University of Leiria, Campus 5, Rua das Olhalvas, 2414-016 Leiria, Portugal.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 19;13(10):1179. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101179.
The quality of palliative care (PC) services is closely linked to the effectiveness of interdisciplinary collaboration. A coordinated approach among professionals from different fields fosters holistic, person-centered care, ensuring comprehensive support for patients with complex conditions and their families. In hospital settings, In-Hospital Palliative Care Support Teams (EIHSCPs) play a key role in delivering specialized care, enhancing interdepartmental communication, training other healthcare professionals, and optimizing resources. Strong leadership by PC specialists, combined with effective team management, contributes to symptom relief, improved quality of life, and cost reduction. However, interdisciplinary collaboration presents challenges, including competing priorities, resource constraints, and communication barriers. Despite its recognized benefits, research on its implementation in PC, particularly in Portugal, remains scarce. This study explores the perspectives and practices of professionals within an EIHSCP, examining team dynamics, interprofessional collaboration, and key facilitators and barriers. : Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians, nurses, psychologists, and social workers from the EIHSCP in the Médio Tejo region. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. : The interview findings were organized into three themes: (1) Social Representations and Interdisciplinary Practice; (2) Competencies for Interdisciplinary Practice; and (3) Challenges in Interdisciplinary Practice. Participants consistently highlighted that interdisciplinary collaboration enhances communication between services and improves care quality. While teamwork is central, patient- and family-centered care remains the priority. Key competencies include empathy, ethics, active listening, and cultural sensitivity, alongside structural and procedural elements such as team meetings, integrated communication, and clear referral criteria. Continuous education and professional development are essential. Challenges primarily stem from limited human and material resources, staff workload and stress, communication gaps between hospital and community teams, and insufficient institutional recognition. Suggested improvements focus on investing in ongoing training, strengthening communication and inter-institutional collaboration, and revising the organizational model of PC within Portugal's National Health Service. : Interdisciplinary collaboration in PC is fundamental for holistic, patient-centered care but is hindered by structural and organizational barriers.
姑息治疗(PC)服务的质量与跨学科协作的有效性密切相关。来自不同领域的专业人员采取协调一致的方法,促进以患者为中心的整体护理,确保为病情复杂的患者及其家庭提供全面支持。在医院环境中,住院姑息治疗支持团队(EIHSCPs)在提供专科护理、加强部门间沟通、培训其他医护专业人员以及优化资源方面发挥着关键作用。PC专家的有力领导,加上有效的团队管理,有助于缓解症状、提高生活质量并降低成本。然而,跨学科协作也带来了挑战,包括相互竞争的优先事项、资源限制和沟通障碍。尽管其益处已得到认可,但关于其在PC中的实施情况的研究,尤其是在葡萄牙,仍然很少。本研究探讨了EIHSCP内专业人员的观点和实践,考察了团队动态、跨专业协作以及关键的促进因素和障碍。:对米迪奥特茹地区EIHSCP的医生、护士、心理学家和社会工作者进行了12次半结构化访谈。使用布劳恩和克拉克的反思性主题分析法对数据进行了分析。:访谈结果分为三个主题:(1)社会表征与跨学科实践;(2)跨学科实践的能力;(3)跨学科实践中的挑战。参与者一致强调,跨学科协作加强了服务之间的沟通并提高了护理质量。虽然团队合作是核心,但以患者和家庭为中心的护理仍然是首要任务。关键能力包括同理心、职业道德、积极倾听和文化敏感性,以及团队会议、综合沟通和明确的转诊标准等结构和程序要素。持续教育和专业发展至关重要。挑战主要源于人力和物力资源有限、工作人员工作量和压力、医院与社区团队之间的沟通差距以及机构认可度不足。建议的改进措施集中在投资持续培训、加强沟通和机构间协作,以及修订葡萄牙国家卫生服务体系内PC的组织模式。:PC中的跨学科协作对于以患者为中心的整体护理至关重要,但受到结构和组织障碍的阻碍。