• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成为具备健康素养组织的历程:卫生系统改进概况

The Journey to Become a Health Literate Organization: A Snapshot of Health System Improvement.

作者信息

Brach Cindy

机构信息

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:203-237.

PMID:28972519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5666686/
Abstract

A health literate health care organization is one that makes it easy for people to navigate, understand, and use information and services to take care of their health. This chapter explores the journey that a growing number of organizations are taking to become health literate. Health literacy improvement has increasingly been viewed as a systems issue, one that moves beyond siloed efforts by recognizing that action is required on multiple levels. To help operationalize the shift to a systems perspective, members of the U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine Roundtable on Health Literacy defined ten attributes of health literate health care organizations. External factors, such as payment reform in the U.S., have buoyed health literacy as an organizational priority. Health care organizations often begin their journey to become health literate by conducting health literacy organizational assessments, focusing on written and spoken communication, and addressing difficulties in navigating facilities and complex systems. As organizations' efforts mature, health literacy quality improvement efforts give way to transformational activities. These include: the highest levels of the organization embracing health literacy, making strategic plans for initiating and spreading health literate practices, establishing a health literacy workforce and supporting structures, raising health literacy awareness and training staff system-wide, expanding patient and family input, establishing policies, leveraging information technology, monitoring policy compliance, addressing population health, and shifting the culture of the organization. The penultimate section of this chapter highlights the experiences of three organizations that have explicitly set a goal to become health literate: Carolinas Healthcare System (CHS), Intermountain Healthcare, and Northwell Health. These organizations are pioneers that approached health literacy in a systematic fashion, each exemplifying different routes an organization can take to become health literate. CHS provides an example of how, even when the most senior leadership drives the organization to become health literate, continued progress requires constant reinvigoration. At Intermountain Healthcare, the push to become a health literate organization was the natural consequence of organizational adoption of a model of shared accountability that necessitated patient engagement for its success. Northwell Health, on the other hand, provides a model of how a persistent champion can elevate health literacy to become a system priority and how system-wide policies and procedures can advance effective communication across language differences, health literacy, and cultures. The profiles of the three systems make clear that the opportunities for health literacy improvement are vast. Success depends on the presence of a perfect storm of conditions conducive to transformational change. This chapter ends with lessons learned from the experiences of health literacy pioneers that may be useful to organizations embarking on the journey. The journey is long, and there are bumps along the road. Nonetheless, discernable progress has been made. While committed to transformation, organizations seeking to be health literate recognize that it is not a destination you can ever reach. A health literate organization is constantly striving, always knowing that further improvement can be made.

摘要

一个具备健康素养的医疗保健机构,是指能让人们轻松获取、理解并利用信息与服务来维护自身健康的机构。本章探讨了越来越多的机构为具备健康素养所经历的过程。健康素养的提升日益被视为一个系统问题,它超越了各自为政的努力,因为认识到需要在多个层面采取行动。为推动向系统视角的转变,美国国家科学院、工程院、医学院健康素养圆桌会议的成员定义了具备健康素养的医疗保健机构的十个特征。诸如美国支付改革等外部因素,已将健康素养提升为机构的一项优先事项。医疗保健机构通常通过开展健康素养组织评估来开启其具备健康素养的征程,评估重点在于书面和口头沟通,并解决在设施和复杂系统中导航的困难。随着机构努力的成熟,健康素养质量改进工作让位于变革活动。这些活动包括:机构高层接受健康素养理念,制定启动和推广具备健康素养实践的战略计划,建立健康素养工作队伍和支持结构,在全系统提高健康素养意识并培训员工,扩大患者和家属的参与度,制定政策,利用信息技术,监测政策合规情况,关注人群健康,以及转变机构文化。本章倒数第二部分重点介绍了三个明确设定具备健康素养目标的机构的经验:卡罗莱纳医疗系统(CHS)、山间医疗保健公司和诺斯韦尔健康。这些机构是先驱,它们以系统的方式对待健康素养,每个机构都例证了机构在迈向具备健康素养过程中可以采取的不同路径。CHS展示了即便最高层领导推动机构具备健康素养,持续进步仍需要不断注入活力的情况。在山间医疗保健公司,推动成为具备健康素养的机构是机构采用共同问责模式的自然结果,而该模式的成功需要患者的参与。另一方面,诺斯韦尔健康提供了一个模式,说明一位坚持不懈的倡导者如何能将健康素养提升为系统优先事项,以及全系统的政策和程序如何能促进跨越语言差异、健康素养水平和文化的有效沟通。这三个系统的简介清楚表明,提升健康素养的机会巨大。成功取决于是否存在有利于变革性变化的完美条件组合。本章最后总结了健康素养先驱者的经验教训,这些经验教训可能对正在踏上这一征程的机构有用。这一征程漫长,途中会有坎坷。尽管如此,但已取得了明显进展。致力于变革的机构在追求具备健康素养时认识到,这不是一个能真正抵达的终点。一个具备健康素养的机构始终在努力,始终明白还能进一步改进。

相似文献

1
The Journey to Become a Health Literate Organization: A Snapshot of Health System Improvement.成为具备健康素养组织的历程:卫生系统改进概况
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:203-237.
2
Becoming a health literate organization: Formative research results from healthcare organizations providing care for undeserved communities.成为具备健康素养的组织:为弱势群体提供护理的医疗保健组织的形成性研究结果。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2017 Nov;30(4):188-196. doi: 10.1177/0951484817727130. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
3
Building health literacy system capacity: a framework for health literate systems.构建健康素养体系能力:健康素养体系框架。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_1):i13-i23. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab153.
4
Organizational Health Literacy: Review of Theories, Frameworks, Guides, and Implementation Issues.组织健康素养:理论、框架、指南及实施问题综述
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018757848. doi: 10.1177/0046958018757848.
5
Original Research: Assessing Organizational Focus on Health Literacy in North Texas Hospitals.原始研究:评估北德克萨斯州医院对健康素养的组织关注。
Am J Nurs. 2020 Dec;120(12):24-33. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000723424.47838.4d.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
The U.S. National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy: A Model for Positive Organizational Change.《美国提高健康素养国家行动计划:积极组织变革的典范》
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:186-202.
8
Which criteria characterize a health literate health care organization? - a scoping review on organizational health literacy.哪些标准可以体现一个有文化素养的医疗机构?——一个关于组织文化素养的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06604-z.
9
Improving Health Literacy at the Organizational Level.提升组织层面的健康素养。
J Dr Nurs Pract. 2020 Mar 1;13(1):79-83. doi: 10.1891/2380-9418.JDNP-D-19-00028. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptual Framework of Health-Literate Nursing System: A Proceduralized Grounded Theory Approach.健康素养护理系统的概念框架:一种程序化的扎根理论方法。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 18;2025:1496009. doi: 10.1155/jonm/1496009. eCollection 2025.
2
Women with endometriosis: Experiences with pain management and views on optimal healthcare through the concept of health literacy.患有子宫内膜异位症的女性:通过健康素养概念进行疼痛管理的经历及对最佳医疗保健的看法。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251347085. doi: 10.1177/17455057251347085. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
3
The Construction Level of Health Literate Health Organizations and Its Impact on Patients' Health Literacy: Based on Self-Determination Theory and Structural Equation Modeling.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医师费率表下的基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)和替代支付模式(APM)激励措施,以及以医师为重点的支付模式标准。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 4;81(214):77008-831.
2
The effectiveness of the teach-back method on adherence and self-management in health education for people with chronic disease: a systematic review.反馈教学法对慢性病患者健康教育中依从性和自我管理的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Jan;14(1):210-47. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2296.
3
健康素养水平的健康组织建设及其对患者健康素养的影响:基于自我决定理论和结构方程模型
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251351178. doi: 10.1177/00469580251351178. Epub 2025 Jul 20.
4
Incorporating digital health into organizational health literacy: An updated definition, tools, and recommendations.将数字健康纳入组织健康素养:最新定义、工具及建议。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Jul 8;38(5):8404704251356518. doi: 10.1177/08404704251356518.
5
A Health Literate Healthcare Organization Index System for China: Based on CiteSpace and Qualitative Analysis.中国健康素养医疗组织指数体系:基于CiteSpace和定性分析
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 1;18:3065-3090. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S520366. eCollection 2025.
6
Defining, assessing, and implementing organizational health literacy: barriers, facilitators, and tools - a systematic review.定义、评估和实施组织健康素养:障碍、促进因素和工具——一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12775-w.
7
Delivering Patient-Centered Care With Respect to Patient Education and Health Literacy in Athletic Training Job Settings.在运动训练工作环境中,提供以患者为中心的护理,注重患者教育和健康素养。
J Athl Train. 2025 Mar 1;60(3):259-272. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0148.24.
8
Readability of online and offline written health information: a protocol of a systematic review of systematic reviews.在线和离线书面健康信息的可读性:一项系统评价的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 23;14(12):e079756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079756.
9
A methodological research for development and psychometric properties of a new Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization (MAHLO-76) in hospital settings.一项关于开发用于评估医院环境中具有健康素养组织的新测量工具(MAHLO - 76)及其心理测量特性的方法学研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):1642. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12130-5.
10
Organizational health literacy in German hospitals: a cross-sectional survey among hospital managers.德国医院的组织健康素养:一项针对医院管理者的横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 13;24(1):1227. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11649-x.
Reducing Pediatric Readmissions: Using a Discharge Bundle Combined With Teach-back Methodology.
减少儿科再入院率:采用出院综合护理方案结合反馈教学法
J Nurs Care Qual. 2016 Jul-Sep;31(3):224-32. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000176.
4
[Why should and how can hospitals improve their organizational health literacy?].[医院为何应提高以及如何提高其组织健康素养?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Sep;58(9):989-95. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2206-6.
5
Reducing readmissions using teach-back: enhancing patient and family education.运用复述指导法减少再入院率:加强患者及家属教育
J Nurs Adm. 2015 Jan;45(1):35-42. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000155.
6
The CDC Clear Communication Index is a new evidence-based tool to prepare and review health information.美国疾病控制与预防中心清晰沟通指数是一种基于证据的新工具,用于编写和审核健康信息。
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Sep;15(5):629-37. doi: 10.1177/1524839914538969. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
7
A proposed 'health literate care model' would constitute a systems approach to improving patients' engagement in care.提出的“健康素养护理模式”将构成一种改善患者参与护理的系统方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):357-67. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1205.
8
Assessing health literacy practices in a community pharmacy environment: experiences using the AHRQ Pharmacy Health Literacy Assessment Tool.评估社区药房环境中的健康素养实践:使用 AHRQ 药房健康素养评估工具的经验。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):564-96. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
9
Health literacy interventions and outcomes: an updated systematic review.健康素养干预措施与结果:一项更新的系统评价。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Mar(199):1-941.
10
Health Literacy INDEX: development, reliability, and validity of a new tool for evaluating the health literacy demands of health information materials.健康素养指数:一种新工具的开发、信度和效度,用于评估健康信息材料的健康素养需求。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:203-21. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.712612.