Peta Katarzyna, Stemp W James, Stocking Tera, Chen Richard, Love George, Gleason Matthew A, Houk Brett A, Brown Christopher A
Institute of Mechanical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, Pl. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznań, Poland.
Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminology, Keene State College, 229 Main Street, Keene, NH 03435-3400, USA.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jun 21;18(13):2939. doi: 10.3390/ma18132939.
A relatively new GelSight Max measurement instrument was applied to the microtopographies of experimental hardened clay surfaces, both with and without fingerprint (dermatoglyph) impressions, and the surface of an archaeological pottery handle fragment with a preserved fingerprint (paleodermatoglyph). The experimental clay surfaces were documented in order to determine the instrument's ability to capture these surfaces in three-dimensions by imprinting them onto an elastomeric tactile membrane. Fingerprints on the experimental hardened clay and the archaeological pottery fragment were mathematically documented to test this instrument's ability to capture these impressions. The surface texture measurements of the hardened clay and the pottery fragment were mathematically compared using conventional topographic characterization parameters (height and hybrid), fractal dimensions (Das) with associated coefficients of determination (R), and multiscalar geometric characterization parameters, particularly relative area (Srel), area-scale complexity (Asfc), relative length (RL), and length-scale complexity (Lsfc). The surfaces of the experimental hardened clay with and without fingerprints and the archaeological pottery handle fragment with a fingerprint can be discriminated using some conventional height parameters, as well as some multiscale geometric topographic characterization parameters. Specifically, relative area (Srel), area-scale complexity (Asfc), relative length (RL), and length-scale complexity (Lsfc) could all discriminate between the hardened clay block with and without fingerprints and the fingerprint on the archaeological pottery handle fragment at different scales of measurement. Mean square ratios (MSRs) above 90% and 95% confidence levels indicated that the discrimination of these multiscale geometric characterizations was significant. In sum, the GelSight Max has the potential to be a valuable instrument for archaeologists studying pottery and fingerprints.
一种相对较新的GelSight Max测量仪器被应用于实验硬化粘土表面的微观形貌,包括有和没有指纹(皮纹)印记的情况,以及一个带有保存指纹(古皮纹)的考古陶制手柄碎片的表面。对实验粘土表面进行记录,以确定该仪器通过将其印在弹性触觉膜上来三维捕捉这些表面的能力。对实验硬化粘土和考古陶片上的指纹进行数学记录,以测试该仪器捕捉这些印记的能力。使用传统地形特征参数(高度和混合参数)、分形维数(Das)及其相关决定系数(R)以及多尺度几何特征参数,特别是相对面积(Srel)、面积尺度复杂度(Asfc)、相对长度(RL)和长度尺度复杂度(Lsfc),对硬化粘土和陶片的表面纹理测量进行数学比较。使用一些传统高度参数以及一些多尺度几何地形特征参数,可以区分有无指纹的实验硬化粘土表面以及带有指纹的考古陶制手柄碎片的表面。具体而言,相对面积(Srel)、面积尺度复杂度(Asfc)、相对长度(RL)和长度尺度复杂度(Lsfc)在不同测量尺度下都能区分有无指纹的硬化粘土块以及考古陶制手柄碎片上的指纹。90%和95%置信水平以上的均方比(MSR)表明,这些多尺度几何特征的区分是显著的。总之,GelSight Max有潜力成为考古学家研究陶器和指纹的有价值工具。