Yousaf Iqra, Kegler Ulrike, Hofner Manuela, Noehammer Christa
Center for Health & Bioresources, Molecular Diagnostics, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Giefinggasse 4, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 2;26(13):6365. doi: 10.3390/ijms26136365.
Circulating cell-free nucleic acids (NAs), in particular plasma-derived cell-free DNA, have evolved into promising clinical analytes for prenatal diagnostics, cancer analysis, and cancer surveillance and therapy monitoring. Nevertheless, salivary extracellular and extracellular vesicle (EV)-derived DNA and microRNA have recently gained attention as potential non-invasive biomarkers for a variety of diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular, autoimmune, and infectious diseases. Our goal in this study was therefore to evaluate and optimize commercially available approaches for cell-free nucleic acid isolation, focusing specifically on DNA and miRNA present in cell-free saliva or saliva-derived EVs. Along these lines, we investigated various commercially available kits, which enable parallel isolation of cell-free DNA and RNA in separate fractions from cell-free saliva and salivary EVs, respectively, and compared them to single analyte extraction kits. The efficiency of all tested nucleic acid extraction methods was determined by comparing DNA and RNA fluorescence spectroscopy measurements and quantitative PCR values obtained from a selection of different DNA- and microRNA targets. We found the Norgen Plasma/Serum RNA/DNA Purification Mini kit in combination with the miRCURY exosome isolation kit to work best in our hands and to provide the highest yields of EV-derived nucleic acids. Having tested and identified effective protocols for isolating salivary extracellular nucleic acids, we present with this comparison study, among others, a sound basis for future circulating small nucleic acid and epigenetic biomarker research aiming for early disease diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction from cell-free saliva, representing an easy-to-collect and readily available diagnostic fluid.
循环游离核酸(NAs),尤其是血浆来源的游离DNA,已逐渐成为产前诊断、癌症分析、癌症监测及治疗监测中颇具前景的临床分析物。然而,唾液细胞外及细胞外囊泡(EV)衍生的DNA和微小RNA,最近作为多种疾病(包括癌症、心血管疾病、自身免疫性疾病和感染性疾病)的潜在非侵入性生物标志物受到关注。因此,我们在本研究中的目标是评估和优化市售的游离核酸分离方法,特别关注游离唾液或唾液衍生的EV中存在的DNA和微小RNA。为此,我们研究了各种市售试剂盒,这些试剂盒能够分别从游离唾液和唾液EV中平行分离出不同组分的游离DNA和RNA,并将它们与单分析物提取试剂盒进行比较。通过比较从一系列不同的DNA和微小RNA靶点获得的DNA和RNA荧光光谱测量值以及定量PCR值,来确定所有测试核酸提取方法的效率。我们发现Norgen血浆/血清RNA/DNA纯化迷你试剂盒与miRCURY外泌体分离试剂盒结合使用时,在我们手中效果最佳,能提供最高产量的EV衍生核酸。在测试并确定了分离唾液细胞外核酸的有效方案后,我们通过这项比较研究,为未来旨在从游离唾液中进行早期疾病诊断、预后和预测的循环小核酸和表观遗传生物标志物研究提供了坚实基础,游离唾液是一种易于收集且随时可得的诊断液。