Chier Mya, Oakey Aidan, Budny Michelle L, Lemoine Nathan P
Department of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin United States of America.
Department of Zoology, Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 7;20(8):e0329615. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329615. eCollection 2025.
Electroculture, or the practice of applying electric fields or current to plants, has been explored for nearly three hundred years. Recently, home gardeners on social media have adopted the term electroculture to describe inserting copper-wrapped dowels into root soil as a cost-effective means of improving crop yield in small garden spaces. Given the renewed interest, big box stores have begun stocking copper-wrapped dowels as a means of improving plant growth in urban container gardens, yet whether such passive electroculture is sufficiently beneficial to plant growth to justify the cost and materials, particularly of copper, remains debated. It is likely that copper rods produce too little voltage to affect plant physiology. In this study, we tested the hypotheses that 1) inserting copper-wrapped dowel rods into the soil will not improve plant growth, photosynthesis, or yield, and 2) if copper-wrapped dowel rods improve plant growth, it is due to copper fertilization rather than electrical conductance. We tested these hypotheses on two leafy green vegetables, mustard greens and kale, and two root vegetables, beets and turnips, to determine if plant life history was an important factor in the efficacy of passive electroculture. We found no consistent evidence that passive electroculture is beneficial to crop growth or yield in container gardens. Although we documented statistically significant effects of buried copper on the above- and belowground biomass of turnips, it is unlikely that improved turnip yield was due to copper fertilization because plants grown with exposed copper rods did not show the same effect. While crop production could potentially be enhanced by the application of active electrical fields, the voltages required exceed what is produced by copper-wrapped wooden dowels. We therefore suggest that both the production and purchase of such products would waste both financial and natural resources.
电栽培,即将电场或电流施加于植物的做法,已经被探索了近三百年。最近,社交媒体上的家庭园艺爱好者采用了“电栽培”这个术语来描述将包裹铜的木钉插入根部土壤,作为在小花园空间提高作物产量的一种经济有效的方法。鉴于这种新的兴趣,大型商店已经开始储备包裹铜的木钉,作为改善城市容器花园中植物生长的一种手段,然而,这种被动电栽培是否对植物生长有足够的益处,以证明成本和材料,特别是铜的合理性,仍存在争议。铜棒产生的电压可能太小,无法影响植物生理。在本研究中,我们检验了以下假设:1)将包裹铜的木钉插入土壤不会改善植物生长、光合作用或产量;2)如果包裹铜的木钉能改善植物生长,那是由于铜施肥而非电导作用。我们在两种叶菜类蔬菜(芥菜和羽衣甘蓝)以及两种根菜类蔬菜(甜菜和芜菁)上检验了这些假设,以确定植物生活史是否是被动电栽培效果的一个重要因素。我们没有找到一致的证据表明被动电栽培对容器花园中的作物生长或产量有益。虽然我们记录了埋入铜对芜菁地上和地下生物量的统计学显著影响,但芜菁产量的提高不太可能是由于铜施肥,因为用暴露铜棒种植的植物没有表现出相同的效果。虽然通过施加有源电场可能会提高作物产量,但所需电压超过了包裹铜的木钉所产生的电压。因此,我们认为生产和购买此类产品会浪费财力和自然资源。