Suppr超能文献

用于鉴定非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的API 20E系统与康宁N/F系统的比较

Comparison of the API 20E and Corning N/F systems for identification of nonfermentative gram-negative rods.

作者信息

Warwood N M, Blazevic D J, Hofherr L

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):175-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.175-179.1979.

Abstract

A total of 231 strains of nonfermenting gram-negative rods were tested on the API 20E system, the Corning N/F system, and conventional media. When the results of identification to species were compared, the API system agreed with the conventional system on 69% of the isolates, and the Corning system agreed with the conventional system on 79% of the isolates. Both kit systems were deficient in identifying Pseudomonas cepacia and the more unusual isolates.

摘要

总共231株非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌在API 20E系统、康宁N/F系统和传统培养基上进行了测试。当比较种属鉴定结果时,API系统与传统系统对69%的分离株鉴定结果一致,康宁系统与传统系统对79%的分离株鉴定结果一致。两种试剂盒系统在鉴定洋葱伯克霍尔德菌和更罕见的分离株方面都存在不足。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97d/273123/b378d452bb08/jcm00181-0080-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验