Fortmann S P, Rogers T, Vranizan K, Haskell W L, Solomon D S, Farquhar J W
Prev Med. 1984 Jan;13(1):127-35. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(84)90045-8.
Indirect, biochemical measures of cigarette use are valuable in confirming smoking status in both cross-sectional and cessation studies. This study compares two such biochemical markers, expired-air carbon monoxide (CO) and plasma thiocyanate (SCN), in a representative population sample of 2,237 adults (ages 18-74) from the baseline survey of the Stanford Five City Project. CO and SCN are both significantly higher in self-reported smokers than in nonsmokers and correlate well with number of cigarettes smoked per day. CO appears to be more sensitive and specific than SCN in comparison to self-report, and CO misclassifies a significantly smaller number of nonsmokers, regular smokers, and light smokers (less than 9 cigarettes per day) than does SCN. Together, CO and SCN better classify smokers and nonsmokers than do either alone. Neither biochemical is a reliable indicator in irregular smokers (no cigarettes in past 48 hr). Despite its much shorter metabolic half-life, CO is a better indicator of cigarette use than is SCN in this cross-sectional study. CO is generally simpler and less expensive to measure than is SCN, and CO may be a preferable indirect measure of smoking status in some studies of smoking cessation.
在横断面研究和戒烟研究中,香烟使用的间接生化测量方法对于确认吸烟状况很有价值。本研究比较了两种此类生化标志物,即呼出气体中的一氧化碳(CO)和血浆硫氰酸盐(SCN),研究对象是来自斯坦福五城市项目基线调查的2237名成年人(年龄在18 - 74岁之间)的代表性人群样本。自我报告的吸烟者中,CO和SCN水平均显著高于非吸烟者,且与每日吸烟量密切相关。与自我报告相比,CO似乎比SCN更敏感、更具特异性,并且与SCN相比,CO将非吸烟者、经常吸烟者和轻度吸烟者(每天少于9支烟)误分类的人数要少得多。CO和SCN共同对吸烟者和非吸烟者的分类效果优于单独使用其中任何一种。对于不规律吸烟者(过去48小时内未吸烟),这两种生化指标都不是可靠的指标。在这项横断面研究中,尽管CO的代谢半衰期短得多,但它仍是比SCN更好的香烟使用指标。一般来说,测量CO比测量SCN更简单、成本更低,在一些戒烟研究中,CO可能是更可取的吸烟状况间接测量指标。