Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死后不久对动态和静态运动的心血管反应。在职业工作评估中的应用。

Cardiovascular responses to dynamic and static effort soon after myocardial infarction. Application to occupational work assessment.

作者信息

DeBusk R F, Valdez R, Houston N, Haskell W

出版信息

Circulation. 1978 Aug;58(2):368-75. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.2.368.

Abstract

Static and dynamic work involving the arms and the legs was performed by 40 men seven weeks after myocardial infarction. Leg ergometry produced a significantly higher peak work load, systolic blood pressure (BPs), heart rate (HR), and HR X BPs X 10(-2) product (DP) than did arm ergometry: 842 +/- 178 vs 546 +/- 135 kg-m/min, 176 +/- 24 vs 154 +/- 19 mm Hg and 256 +/- 54 vs 219 +/- 48 (SD). Peak heart rates were 145 and 142. Endpoints were primarily muscular and generalized fatigue and dyspnea. Ischemic abnormalities and ventricular ectopy were more frequent with leg ergometry. Sustained forearm lifting elicited higher HR, PBs and DP responses than sustained handgrip contraction: 95 +/- 16 vs 91 +/- 16 beats/min, 162 +/- 18 vs 152 +/- 17 mm Hg and 154 +/- 33 vs 139 +/- 33 (SD). Ischemic ST segment depression and significant ventricuar arrhythmias were infrequent with static effort. Dynamic leg testing is superior to dynamic or static arm testing in assessing the capacity of patients to perform physical work tasks after myocardial infarction.

摘要

40名男性在心肌梗死后7周进行了涉及手臂和腿部的静态及动态工作。腿部测力计测试产生的峰值工作负荷、收缩压(BPs)、心率(HR)以及心率×收缩压×10⁻²乘积(DP)显著高于手臂测力计测试:分别为842±178 vs 546±135千克-米/分钟、176±24 vs 154±19毫米汞柱以及256±54 vs 219±48(标准差)。峰值心率分别为145和142。终点指标主要为肌肉疲劳、全身疲劳和呼吸困难。腿部测力计测试时缺血性异常和室性异位更常见。持续前臂上举引起的心率、收缩压和DP反应高于持续握力收缩:分别为95±16 vs 91±16次/分钟、162±18 vs 152±17毫米汞柱以及154±33 vs 139±33(标准差)。静态用力时缺血性ST段压低和显著室性心律失常不常见。在评估心肌梗死后患者进行体力工作任务的能力方面,动态腿部测试优于动态或静态手臂测试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验