Cartwright P D, Pingel S M
Anaesthesia. 1984 May;39(5):439-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb07312.x.
Midazolam 0.07 mg/kg was compared with diazepam 0.12 mg/kg intravenously as an adjuvant to ketamine anaesthesia in healthy patients undergoing minor gynaecological operations of less than 15 minutes duration. The occurrence of induction and emergence sequelae, and patient acceptance of the technique was assessed by means of a questionnaire. The incidence of unpleasant dreams was 6.7% with midazolam and 26.7% with diazepam. There was no significant difference in any other sequelae. Overall patient acceptance was high at 96.7%.
在接受持续时间少于15分钟的小型妇科手术的健康患者中，将静脉注射0.07毫克/千克的咪达唑仑与0.12毫克/千克的地西泮作为氯胺酮麻醉的辅助药物进行比较。通过问卷调查评估诱导和苏醒后遗症的发生情况以及患者对该技术的接受程度。使用咪达唑仑时不愉快梦境的发生率为6.7%，使用地西泮时为26.7%。在任何其他后遗症方面均无显著差异。患者总体接受率较高，为96.7%。
