Madsen E B, Bundgaard A, Hidinger K G
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1982;23(1):27-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01061373.
The bronchodilator effects of cumulative doses of terbutaline 0.125 mg, 0.125 mg and 0.250 mg administered as a pressurized aerosol via a pear shaped spacer were compared with those of terbutaline 1.25 mg, 1.25 mg and 2.50 mg administered as a nebulized solution via a PARI-inhaler Boy. FEV1.0 and flow-volume curves in 13 patients were measured. Initial placebo treatment of both groups resulted in a significant increase in FEV1.0, especially when it was given in nebulized form. The increase after active drug was significant after 15 min, with only minor changes during the rest of the trial. The log-dose/increase in FEV1.0 showed that equipotent doses of pressurized and nebulized terbutaline were in the ratio 1 to 4. Administration by nebulization offered no clear advantage over use of a pressurized aerosol with a pearshaped spacer.
将累积剂量分别为0.125毫克、0.125毫克和0.250毫克的特布他林通过梨形储雾罐以压力定量气雾剂形式给药,与将1.25毫克、1.25毫克和2.50毫克的特布他林通过PARI吸入器Boy以雾化溶液形式给药的支气管扩张作用进行了比较。测量了13名患者的第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1.0)和流量-容积曲线。两组的初始安慰剂治疗均导致FEV1.0显著增加,尤其是以雾化形式给药时。活性药物给药后15分钟FEV1.0增加显著,在试验的其余时间仅出现轻微变化。FEV1.0增加量的对数剂量显示,压力定量气雾剂和雾化特布他林的等效剂量比为1比4。雾化给药相对于使用带梨形储雾罐的压力定量气雾剂没有明显优势。