Kligman L H, Kligman A M
Arch Dermatol Res. 1981;270(4):453-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00403790.
A controversy exists regarding the ability of retinoic acid to enhance photocarcinogenesis. Divergent results have been obtained with albino hairless mice. We examined this issue with the lightly pigmented variety. We followed two designs: 1. ultraviolet light and topical retinoic acid were given concomitantly while the retinoic acid was continued for many weeks after stopping irradiation; 2. tumors were first induced by ultraviolet light and then treated topically with retinoic acid. In both studies, retinoic acid did not enhance photocarcinogenesis with regard to latent period, tumor yield or tumor progression. It appears that different treatment schedules and different varieties of mice can produce widely disparate results.
关于视黄酸增强光致癌作用的能力存在争议。对白化无毛小鼠已得到了不同的结果。我们用色素沉着较轻的小鼠品种研究了这个问题。我们采用了两种设计方案:1. 紫外线和局部视黄酸同时给予,而在停止照射后视黄酸继续使用数周;2. 先用紫外线诱导肿瘤,然后局部用视黄酸治疗。在这两项研究中,视黄酸在潜伏期、肿瘤发生率或肿瘤进展方面均未增强光致癌作用。看来不同的治疗方案和不同品种的小鼠会产生截然不同的结果。