Bright D C, Potter J W, Allen D C, Spruance R D
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1981 Dec;58(12):1120-6. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198112000-00008.
Recently, there have been several suggestions that Goldmann applanation tonometry can be performed without fluorescein. In order to determine the clinical efficacy of performing Goldmann applanation tonometry without fluorescein, 100 consecutive patients had applanation tonometry performed without fluorescein (Ophthetic only) and with fluorescein (Fluress), according to a predetermined randomization schedule. It was found that the average difference between readings with fluorescein and without fluorescein was 7.01 mm Hg. Tonometry readings without fluorescein were lower than readings with fluorescein. In addition, regression analysis indicated that the differences between the readings with and without fluorescein increased as intraocular pressure increased. By not utilizing fluorescein in Goldmann applanation tonometry, the clinician will record lower readings. In addition, greater errors in measurement occur with increasing intraocular pressures. Because eyes with higher intraocular pressures are at a greater risk to develop glaucomatous optic atrophy and loss of visual field, the merits of Goldmann applanation tonometry without fluorescein are speculative.
最近,有多项建议提出可不使用荧光素进行Goldmann压平眼压测量法。为了确定不使用荧光素进行Goldmann压平眼压测量法的临床效果,按照预定的随机安排,对100例连续患者分别进行了不使用荧光素(仅使用Ophthetic)和使用荧光素(使用Fluress)的压平眼压测量。结果发现,使用荧光素和不使用荧光素测量值的平均差值为7.01毫米汞柱。不使用荧光素的眼压测量值低于使用荧光素的测量值。此外,回归分析表明,使用荧光素和不使用荧光素测量值的差值随眼压升高而增大。在Goldmann压平眼压测量法中不使用荧光素时,临床医生记录的测量值会更低。此外,随着眼压升高,测量误差会更大。由于眼压较高的眼睛发生青光眼性视神经萎缩和视野缺损的风险更大,因此不使用荧光素的Goldmann压平眼压测量法的优点尚不确定。