Guignard J P, Torrado A, Feldman H, Gautier E
Helv Paediatr Acta. 1980 Oct;35(5):437-47.
Five different methods of assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were compared in 500 children older than one year of age. Results of each method were compared with standard inulin clearance values: 1. An evaluation of glomerular function may be inferred from plasma creatinine levels; the validity of this inference is, however, limited because of the wide range of normal values; 2. creatinine clearance values calculated over 3 hours significantly overestimate inulin clearance values; 3. clearance values derived from plasma creatinine concentration ahd height show a poor correlation with traditionally calculated inulin clearances; 4. clearance values calculated as the sum of twice the creatinine clearance and once the urea clearance, divided by three, better predict inulin clearance than either C-creatinine or C-urea alone; 5 inulin clearance values calculated by dividing the quantity of inulin perfused by its plasma concentration, once it has become stable, differ significantly from the values obtained by the standard inulin clearance.--Of all the methods studied, none was found to be an ideal alternative to the traditional inulin clearance when a precise assessment of GFR is warranted. It is concluded that in most clinical conditions derived clearance values do not have significant advantages over the simple determination of plasma creatinine, a valuable but not infallible index of glomerular function.
对500名一岁以上儿童比较了五种不同的肾小球滤过率(GFR)评估方法。将每种方法的结果与标准菊粉清除率值进行比较:1. 可从血浆肌酐水平推断肾小球功能评估;然而,由于正常范围广泛,这种推断的有效性有限;2. 3小时内计算的肌酐清除率值显著高估菊粉清除率值;3. 由血浆肌酐浓度和身高得出的清除率值与传统计算的菊粉清除率相关性较差;4. 计算为两倍肌酐清除率与一次尿素清除率之和再除以三的清除率值,比单独的肌酐清除率(C-肌酐)或尿素清除率(C-尿素)更能准确预测菊粉清除率;5. 通过将灌注的菊粉量除以其血浆浓度(一旦稳定)计算得出的菊粉清除率值,与标准菊粉清除率获得的值有显著差异。——在所有研究的方法中,当需要精确评估GFR时,没有一种方法被发现是传统菊粉清除率的理想替代方法。结论是,在大多数临床情况下,导出的清除率值与简单测定血浆肌酐相比没有显著优势,血浆肌酐是肾小球功能的一个有价值但并非绝对可靠的指标。