Harth S C, Thong Y H
Department of Child Health, University of Queensland, Australia.
J Med Ethics. 1995 Aug;21(4):225-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.4.225.
The issue of aftercare for participants in clinical research was explored in the context of an asthma drug trial. Although there may be financial constraints and practical difficulties with implementation, the results show that it may be feasible for clinical investigators and commercial sponsors to take on some limited responsibility for the medical care of research subjects after clinical trials. However, the ethical implications for this practice remain unclear. On the one hand, society may have a moral obligation to compensate and reward some of its members who assume the risk of research subjects for the benefit of society as a whole. On the other hand, the promise of aftercare may provide an inducement to volunteers which, under certain conditions may be considered morally wrong and scientifically unsound.
在一项哮喘药物试验的背景下,探讨了临床研究参与者的后续护理问题。尽管在实施过程中可能存在资金限制和实际困难,但结果表明,临床试验后临床研究人员和商业赞助商对研究对象的医疗承担一些有限责任可能是可行的。然而,这种做法的伦理影响仍不明确。一方面,社会可能有道义责任补偿和奖励一些为了整个社会的利益而承担研究对象风险的成员。另一方面,后续护理的承诺可能会对志愿者产生一种诱导,在某些情况下,这可能被认为在道德上是错误的,在科学上也是不合理的。