Navazesh M, Wood G J, Brightman V J
Department of Dental Medicine and Public Health, University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, Calif.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Sep;80(3):284-8. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80384-1.
Seventy-one persons (48 women, 23 men; mean age, 51.76 years) were evaluated for salivary flow rates and Candida albicans counts. Each person was seen on three different occasions. Samples of unstimulated whole, chewing-stimulated whole, acid-stimulated parotid, and candy-stimulated parotid saliva were collected under standardized conditions. An oral rinse was also obtained and evaluated for Candida albicans counts. Unstimulated and chewing-stimulated whole flow rates were negatively and significantly (p < 0.001) related to the Candida counts. Unstimulated whole saliva significantly (p < 0.05) differed in persons with Candida counts of 0 versus <500 versus < or = 500. Chewing-stimulated saliva was significantly (p < 0.05) different in persons with 0 counts compared with those with a > or = 500 count. Differences in stimulated parotid flow rates were not significant among different levels of Candida counts. The results of this study reveal that whole saliva is a better predictor than parotid saliva in identification of persons with high Candida albicans counts.
对71人(48名女性,23名男性;平均年龄51.76岁)的唾液流速和白色念珠菌计数进行了评估。每个人在三个不同的时间段接受检查。在标准化条件下收集未刺激的全唾液、咀嚼刺激后的全唾液、酸刺激后的腮腺唾液和糖果刺激后的腮腺唾液样本。还获取了口腔冲洗液并评估白色念珠菌计数。未刺激和咀嚼刺激后的全唾液流速与念珠菌计数呈显著负相关(p < 0.001)。白色念珠菌计数为0、<500和<或 = 500的人群中,未刺激的全唾液存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。白色念珠菌计数为0的人群与计数≥500的人群相比,咀嚼刺激后的唾液存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。在不同白色念珠菌计数水平之间,刺激后的腮腺流速差异不显著。本研究结果表明,在识别白色念珠菌计数高的人群方面,全唾液比腮腺唾液是更好的预测指标。