Suppr超能文献

唾液流速与白色念珠菌计数之间的关系。

Relationship between salivary flow rates and Candida albicans counts.

作者信息

Navazesh M, Wood G J, Brightman V J

机构信息

Department of Dental Medicine and Public Health, University of Southern California, School of Dentistry, Calif.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Sep;80(3):284-8. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80384-1.

Abstract

Seventy-one persons (48 women, 23 men; mean age, 51.76 years) were evaluated for salivary flow rates and Candida albicans counts. Each person was seen on three different occasions. Samples of unstimulated whole, chewing-stimulated whole, acid-stimulated parotid, and candy-stimulated parotid saliva were collected under standardized conditions. An oral rinse was also obtained and evaluated for Candida albicans counts. Unstimulated and chewing-stimulated whole flow rates were negatively and significantly (p < 0.001) related to the Candida counts. Unstimulated whole saliva significantly (p < 0.05) differed in persons with Candida counts of 0 versus <500 versus < or = 500. Chewing-stimulated saliva was significantly (p < 0.05) different in persons with 0 counts compared with those with a > or = 500 count. Differences in stimulated parotid flow rates were not significant among different levels of Candida counts. The results of this study reveal that whole saliva is a better predictor than parotid saliva in identification of persons with high Candida albicans counts.

摘要

对71人(48名女性,23名男性;平均年龄51.76岁)的唾液流速和白色念珠菌计数进行了评估。每个人在三个不同的时间段接受检查。在标准化条件下收集未刺激的全唾液、咀嚼刺激后的全唾液、酸刺激后的腮腺唾液和糖果刺激后的腮腺唾液样本。还获取了口腔冲洗液并评估白色念珠菌计数。未刺激和咀嚼刺激后的全唾液流速与念珠菌计数呈显著负相关(p < 0.001)。白色念珠菌计数为0、<500和<或 = 500的人群中,未刺激的全唾液存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。白色念珠菌计数为0的人群与计数≥500的人群相比,咀嚼刺激后的唾液存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。在不同白色念珠菌计数水平之间,刺激后的腮腺流速差异不显著。本研究结果表明,在识别白色念珠菌计数高的人群方面,全唾液比腮腺唾液是更好的预测指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验